Literature DB >> 29726012

RAD50 germline mutations are associated with poor survival in BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients.

Cong Fan1, Juan Zhang1, Tao Ouyang1, Jinfeng Li1, Tianfeng Wang1, Zhaoqing Fan1, Tie Fan1, Benyao Lin1, Yuntao Xie1.   

Abstract

RAD50 is a highly conserved DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair gene. However, the associations between RAD50 germline mutations and the survival and risk of breast cancer have not been fully elucidated. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical impact of RAD50 germline mutations in a large cohort of unselected breast cancer patients. In our study, RAD50 germline mutations were determined using next-generation sequencing in 7657 consecutive unselected breast cancer patients without BRCA1/2 mutations. We also screened for RAD50 recurrent mutations (L719fs, K994fs, and H1269fs) in 5000 healthy controls using Sanger sequencing. We found that 26 out of 7,657 (0.34%) patients had RAD50 pathogenic mutations, and 16 patients carried one of the three recurrent mutations (L719fs, n = 6 cases; K994fs, n = 5 cases; and H1269fs, n = 5 cases); the recurrent mutation rate was 0.21%. The frequency of the three recurrent mutations in the 5,000 healthy controls was 0.18% (9/5,000). These mutations did not confer an increased risk of breast cancer in the studied patients [odds ratios (OR), 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-2.63; p = 0.72]. Nevertheless, multivariate analysis revealed that RAD50 pathogenic mutations were an independent unfavourable predictor of recurrence-free survival (RFS) [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.66; 95% CI, 1.18-5.98; p = 0.018] and disease-specific survival (DSS; adjusted HR 4.36; 95% CI, 1.58-12.03; p = 0.004) in the entire study cohort. Our study suggested that RAD50 germline mutations are not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, but patients with RAD50 germline mutations have unfavourable survival compared to patients without these mutations.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RAD50 gene; breast cancer; germline mutation; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29726012     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Survey of Reported Disease-Related Mutations in the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 Complex.

Authors:  Samiur Rahman; Marella D Canny; Tanner A Buschmann; Michael P Latham
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 2.  MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex alterations and DNA damage response: implications for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lei Bian; Yiling Meng; Meichao Zhang; Dong Li
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 27.401

3.  Clinical application of liquid biopsy in cancer patients.

Authors:  Chieh-Min Chang; Kuei-Ching Lin; Nien-En Hsiao; Wei-An Hong; Chia-Yu Lin; Ta-Chih Liu; Ya-Sian Chang; Jan-Gowth Chang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Human Endogenous Retrovirus Expression Is Upregulated in the Breast Cancer Microenvironment of HIV Infected Women: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gislaine Curty; Greta A Beckerle; Luis P Iñiguez; Robert L Furler; Pedro S de Carvalho; Jez L Marston; Stephane Champiat; Jonas J Heymann; Christopher E Ormsby; Gustavo Reyes-Terán; Marcelo A Soares; Douglas F Nixon; Matthew L Bendall; Fabio E Leal; Miguel de Mulder Rougvie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Fisetin inhibits proliferation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by inducing DNA damage via RFXAP/KDM4A-dependent histone H3K36 demethylation.

Authors:  Guoping Ding; Xiaodong Xu; Dan Li; Yuhao Chen; Weimin Wang; Dongnan Ping; Shengnan Jia; Liping Cao
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 8.469

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.