| Literature DB >> 29725899 |
Lok R Joshi1,2, Faten A Okda1, Aaron Singrey1,2, Mayara F Maggioli1,2, Tatiane C Faccin1,3, Maureen H V Fernandes1,2, Kyle S Hain1, Scott Dee4, Fernando V Bauermann1,2, Eric A Nelson1,2, Diego G Diel5,6.
Abstract
Passive immunity is critical for protection of neonatal piglets against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV). Here, we investigated the immunogenicity of an orf virus (ORFV) vector expressing the full-length spike (S) protein of PEDV (ORFV-PEDV-S) in pregnant gilts and its ability to confer passive immunity and protection in piglets. Three doses of ORFV-PEDV-S were given to two groups of PEDV-negative pregnant gilts, with the last dose being administered two weeks prior to farrowing. One of the two groups immunized with the ORFV-PEDV-S recombinant virus was also exposed to live PEDV orally on day 31 post-immunization (pi). Antibody responses were assessed in serum, colostrum and milk of immunized gilts, and passive transfer of antibodies was evaluated in piglet sera. The protective efficacy of ORFV-PEDV-S was evaluated after challenge of the piglets with PEDV. PEDV-specific IgG, IgA and neutralizing antibody (NA) responses were detected in ORFV-PEDV-S-immunized and ORFV-PEDV-S-immunized/PEDV-exposed gilts. PEDV NA, IgG and IgA were detected in the serum of piglets born to immunized gilts, demonstrating the transfer of antibodies through colostrum and milk. Piglets born to immunized gilts showed reduced morbidity and a marked reduction in mortality after PEDV challenge in comparison to control piglets. Piglets born to gilts that received ORFV-PEDV-S and were exposed to live PEDV showed stronger NA responses and lower clinical scores when compared to piglets born to gilts immunized with ORFV-PEDV-S alone. These results demonstrate the potential of ORFV as a vaccine delivery platform capable of eliciting passive immunity against PEDV.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29725899 PMCID: PMC7086649 DOI: 10.1007/s00705-018-3855-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Virol ISSN: 0304-8608 Impact factor: 2.574
Experimental design
| Group (n) | Treatment | Day of immunization (route) | Dose TCID50 | No of piglets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (G1) (n = 2) | Control (MEM) | 0, 21, 42 (IM) | 2 × 107.38 | 24 |
| Group 2 (G2) (n = 2) | ORFV-PEDV-S | 0, 21, 42 (IM) | 2 × 107.38 | 24 |
| Group 3 (G3) (n = 2) | ORFV-PEDV-S Live PEDV | 0, 21, 42 (IM) 31 (oral) | 2 × 107.38 | 24 |
| 1 × 105 |
Fig. 1Spike (S)-specific antibody responses in sows. (A) Isotype ELISA demonstrating serum IgG antibody responses specific for the PEDV S protein. (B) Isotype ELISA demonstrating serum IgA antibody responses specific for the PEDV S protein. (C) Virus neutralizing antibody (NA) responses in sows. S/P, sample-to-positive ratio. Group 2 and group 3 gilts were immunized on days 0, 21 and 42 with ORFV-PEDV-S. Oral exposure to live PEDV in group 3 gilts was performed on day 31 pi. Group 1 control gilts were sham-immunized with minimal essential medium (MEM) on the same days. (D) Correlation of sow serum IgG levels with sow mean NA levels. (E) Correlation of sow serum IgA levels with piglet serum NA levels. Correlations were calculated using the Spearman method with a 95% confidence interval using GraphPad Prism 7
Fig. 2Detection of PEDV S-specific antibodies in colostrum/milk. (A) Isotype fluorescent microsphere immunoassay (FMIA) demonstrating S-specific IgG antibodies in colostrum/milk of immunized or control gilts. (B) Isotype FMIA demonstrating S-specific IgA antibodies in colostrum/milk of immunized or control gilts. S/P, sample-to-positive ratio
Fig. 3Passive transfer of antibody to piglets. (A) Isotype ELISA demonstrating S-specific IgG antibody levels in piglet serum. (B) Isotype ELISA demonstrating S-specific IgA antibody levels in piglet serum. (C) Virus neutralizing antibody (NA) levels in piglet serum. Results are presented as group mean S/P ratios or NA titers. The error bars represent +/- standard error of mean (SEM). Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were ran using Tukey’s test. a, b, and c represent statistical significance for G1 vs. G2, G1 vs. G3, and G2 vs. G3, respectively. The significance level is < 0.01. S/P, sample-to-positive ratio; the arrowhead represents the day of challenge with PEDV. (D) Correlation of piglet serum NA levels with sow mean NA levels. (E) Correlation of group mean IgG antibodies in piglet serum with piglet serum NA levels. (F) Correlation of group mean IgA antibodies in piglet serum with piglet serum NA levels. Correlations were calculated using the Spearman method with a 95% confidence interval using GraphPad Prism 7
Fig. 4Clinical presentation, virus shedding, and piglet survival. (A) Daily average group clinical scores recorded after challenge infection with PEDV strain CO13. (B) Virus shedding as determined by PEDV RT-qPCR in piglet feces expressed as log10 genome copy number per milliliter. Data are presented as group means. Error bars represent +/- SEM. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were ran using Tukey’s test. a, b, and c represent statistical significance for G1 vs. G2, G1 vs. G3, and G2 vs. G3, respectively. The significance level is < 0.01. (C) Survival curve demonstrating piglet mortality. The survival curve was generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical comparison between groups was performed using the log-rank test in GraphPad Prism 7. The P-value was adjusted using the Bonferroni method. (D) Correlation of piglet mortality with piglet group mean NA levels. Correlation of piglet mortality with group mean IgA antibodies in sow colostrum/milk. (F) Correlation of piglet mortality with group mean IgG antibodies in sow colostrum/milk. Correlations were calculated using the Spearman method with 95% confidence interval using GraphPad Prism 7