| Literature DB >> 29725868 |
Allan M Lund1,2, Line Borgwardt3,4,5, Federica Cattaneo6, Diego Ardigò6, Silvia Geraci6, Mercedes Gil-Campos7, Linda De Meirleir8, Cécile Laroche9, Philippe Dolhem10, Duncan Cole11, Anna Tylki-Szymanska12, Monica Lopez-Rodriguez13, Encarna Guillén-Navarro14, Christine I Dali1, Bénédicte Héron15, Jens Fogh16, Nicole Muschol17, Dawn Phillips18, J M Hannerieke Van den Hout19, Simon A Jones20, Yasmina Amraoui21, Paul Harmatz22, Nathalie Guffon23.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Long-term outcome data provide important insights into the clinical utility of enzyme replacement therapies. Such data are presented for velmanase alfa in the treatment of alpha-mannosidosis (AM).Entities:
Keywords: Alpha-mannosidosis; Enzyme replacement therapy; Integrated analysis; Lysosomal storage disorder; Recombinant human alpha-mannosidase; Velmanase alfa
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29725868 PMCID: PMC6326957 DOI: 10.1007/s10545-018-0175-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis ISSN: 0141-8955 Impact factor: 4.982
Fig. 1Patient disposition by parental trial and by trial/CU programme at the time of enrolment in rhLAMAN-10 (enrolment in follow-up trial or CU programme determined by national regulations). * Patient 56 participated in rhLAMAN-02 and rhLAMAN-03, discontinued treatment due to an AE but later enrolled in rhLAMAN-05. This patient is only counted once within the integrated analysis. ‡ Patient 58 participated in the rhLAMAN-05 study in the active arm. After completing the rhLAMAN-05 study the patient received velmanase alfa in the compassionate use programme but did not participate in the rhLAMAN-10 study. Since the subject received velmanase alfa for 12 months in the rhLAMAN-05 study, data from this patient are included in the integrated analysis. § Patient 67 participated in the rhLAMAN-05 study in the placebo arm and entered the compassionate use programme but did not participate in the rhLAMAN-10 study. As this patient did not have any data collected during active treatment, he was excluded from the integrated analysis
Fig. 2Changes from baseline in a) serum oligosaccharides and b) 3MSCT
3MSCT, 3-min stair climb test.
Secondary endpoints results
| Variable | Paediatric | Adults | Overall | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Values | % | N | Values | % | N | Values | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | ||
|
| Baseline | 19 | 454.2 (86.3) | - | 14 | 483.4 (95.6) | - | 33 | 466.6 (90.1) | - | - | - |
| 12-month change | 18 | 35.0 (75.7) | 11.4 (29.1) | 13 | 3.8 (43.4) | 1.7 (9.8) | 31 | 21.9 (65.2) | –2.0, 45.8 | 7.3 (23.3) | –1.2, 15.9 | |
| Last observation change | 19 | 39.1 (67.6) | 11.9 (26.6) | 14 | 0.3 (50.5) | 0.7 (11.6) | 33 | 22.4 (63.2) | 0.0, 44.8 | 7.1 (22.0) | –0.7, 14.9 | |
|
| Baseline | 17 | 79.6 (16.4) | - | 12 | 92.5 (19.4) | - | 29 | 84.9 (18.6) | - | - | - |
| 12-month change | 17 | 6.9 (14.6) | 9.7 (19.3) | 11 | 6.0 (9.9) | 6.6 (11.7) | 30 | 6.6 (12.8) | 1.6, 12.5 | 8.5 (16.5) | 2.1, 14.9 | |
| Last observation change | 17 | 11.6 (15.7) | 16.4 (22) | 12 | 3.0 (12.4) | 2.1 (16.7) | 31 | 8.1 (14.8) | 2.4,13.7 | 10.5 (20.9) | 2.6, 18.5 | |
|
| Baseline | 17 | 2.2 (0.9) | - | 12 | 3.2 (1.1) | - | 29 | 2.7 (1.1) | - | - | - |
| 12-month change | 17 | 0.5 (0.5) | 22.1 (21.9) | 11 | 0.2 (0.3) | 7.4 (11.1) | 28 | 0.4 (0.4) | 0.27, 0.55 | 16.3 (19.6) | 8.7, 23.9 | |
| Last observation change | 17 | 0.9 (0.7) | 45.9 (39.1) | 12 | 0.2 (0.4) | 3.5 (16.3) | 28 | 0.6 (0.7) | 0.3, 0.9 | 28.4 (37.8) | 14.0, 42.8 | |
|
| Baseline | 19 | 101.9 (53.8) | - | 14 | 113.9 (38.6) | - | 33 | 107 (47.6) | - | - | - |
| 12-month change | 18 | 13.6 (17.5) | 17.1 (20.6) | 13 | -0.9 (10.6) | 1.6 (13.3) | 31 | 7.5 (16.5) | 1.4, 13.5 | 10.6 (19.3) | 3.5, 17.7 | |
| Last observation change | 19 | 10.7 (29.5) | 23 (40.1) | 14 | -2.5 (9.9) | -0.7 (15.9) | 33 | 5.1 (23.9) | -3.4, 13.6 | 13 (33.9) | 1.0, 25.0 | |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Not/slightly impaired n (%) | 15 (62.5) | 19 (86.4) | 21 (87.5) | |||||||||
| Impaired n (%) | 7 (29.2) | 3 (13.6) | 3 (12.5) | |||||||||
| Seriously Impaired n (%) | 2 (8.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |||||||||
6MWT, 6-Minute Walk Test; BOT-2; Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency; FVC, forced vital capacity; SD, standard deviation
*“Not/slightly impaired” serum IgG concentration defined relative to Cassidy et al 1974; “impaired” serum IgG concentration defined as 4 mg/mL to lower limit of normal range,
“seriously impaired serum IgG concentration defined as < 4 mg/ml
Summary of TEAEs by age and in the overall population
| Paediatric | Adult | Overall | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of events | Number of patients (%) | Number of events | Number of patients (%) | Number of events | Number of patients (%) | |
| Any TEAEs | 423 | 17 (89.5) | 123 | 12 (85.7) | 546 | 29 (87.9) |
| ADRs | 69 | 12 (63.2) | 15 | 5 (35.7) | 84 | 17 (51.5) |
| Serious TEAEs | 9 | 7 (36.8) | 5 | 5 (35.7) | 14 | 12 (36.4) |
| Serious treatment-related TEAEs | 1 | 1 (5.3) | 1 | 1 (7.1) | 2 | 2 (6.1) |
| Severe TEAEs | 3 | 2 (10.5) | 1 | 1 (7.1) | 4 | 3 (9.1) |
| TEAEs with a fatal outcome | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| TEAEs leading to discontinuation | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
ADR adverse drug reaction, TEAEs treatment-emergent adverse events