Literature DB >> 29725746

MRI analysis of peripheral soft tissue composition, not body mass index, correlates with outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Michael T Milone1, Kartik Shenoy2, Hien Pham2, Laith M Jazrawi2, Eric J Strauss2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To utilize MRI to assess the relationship between BMI, peripheral soft tissue composition about the knee, and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that a fatty periarticular soft tissue composition may be better than BMI at predicting poor outcomes after ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who underwent primary acute ACL reconstruction were identified from the surgical database and their data were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were selected based on availability of 2-year IKDC outcome scores, BMI data, and preoperative MRI studies. To approximate peripheral soft tissue composition, novel measurements of axial MRI images were employed using PACS ROI measurement tool. Relationships were assessed between IKDC outcome scores and measures of body habitus including BMI, total knee area, knee fatty-connective tissue area, and fatty-connective tissue to bone size ratio.
RESULTS: The median BMI was 24.3 kg/m2 (range 18.5-36.9). Median IKDC score was 81.0 (range 46-100). BMI was correlated with total knee area (R = 0.72) and periarticular fat (R = 0.53). Neither continuous BMI (n.s.) nor total knee area (n.s.) was predictor of IKDC outcomes scores. Periarticular fatty-connective tissue trended towards predicting negative outcomes (n.s.). Periarticular fatty-connective tissue to bone size ratio was a significant negative predictor of IKDC scores (p = 0.03). Patients with more fat than bone on axial MRI (ratio > 1, N = 34) reported a lower mean IKDC score compared to patients with a ratio < 1 (N = 24) (77.2 vs. 87.7, p = 0.0028). The top quartile (N = 14) of these ratios reported a mean IKDC score of 68.9, compared to 87.3 of the bottom quartile (p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Periarticular soft tissue composition, as approximated by the novel MRI analysis of this study, is a better predictor of outcomes following ACL reconstruction than is BMI. This information can be utilized in guiding surgeon and patient expectations following surgery, either via a direct application of these measurements or heightened awareness of the importance of peripheral body habitus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; ACL reconstruction; Adipose tissue; BMI; MRI; Outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29725746     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4966-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  22 in total

1.  Serum adipokines in osteoarthritis; comparison with controls and relationship with local parameters of synovial inflammation and cartilage damage.

Authors:  T N de Boer; W E van Spil; A M Huisman; A A Polak; J W J Bijlsma; F P J G Lafeber; S C Mastbergen
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Quadriceps Strength Predicts Self-reported Function Post-ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian Pietrosimone; Adam S Lepley; Matthew S Harkey; Brittney A Luc-Harkey; J Troy Blackburn; Phillip A Gribble; Jeffrey T Spang; David H Sohn
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Association of Meniscal Status, Lower Extremity Alignment, and Body Mass Index With Chondrosis at Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Amanda K Haas; Laura J Huston; Samuel K Nwosu; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Predictors of activity level 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) ACLR cohort study.

Authors:  Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Comorbidities in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared With Matched Controls Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury From Danish Registries.

Authors:  Lene Rahr-Wagner; Theis Muncholm Thillemann; Martin Lind; Alma Becic Pedersen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Differences in quadriceps muscle strength and fatigue between lean and obese subjects.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Marc Jubeau; Urs Munzinger; Mario Bizzini; Fiorenza Agosti; Alessandra De Col; Claudio L Lafortuna; Alessandro Sartorio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Deborah A Kowalchuk; Christopher D Harner; Freddie H Fu; James J Irrgang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Outcomes of repeat revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Timothy B Griffith; Benjamin J Allen; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Does body mass index affect outcomes of ambulatory knee and shoulder surgery?

Authors:  Melissa A Kluczynski; Leslie J Bisson; John M Marzo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Weak associations between body mass index and self-reported disability in people with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian Pietrosimone; Christopher Kuenze; Joseph M Hart; Charles Thigpen; Adam S Lepley; J Troy Blackburn; Darin A Padua; Terry Grindstaff; Hope Davis; David Bell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  1 in total

1.  Body Composition Changes in the Immediate Peri-operative Period Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael C Marinier; Ayobami S Ogunsola; Jacob M Elkins
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2022-09-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.