| Literature DB >> 29725487 |
Philippe Jean-Luc Gradidge1, Shane A Norris2, Richard Munthali2, Nigel J Crowther3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of obesity in sub-Saharan African women is not well understood, and black South African women in the region are particularly vulnerable. This study aimed to examine whether the relationship of socioeconomic status (SES) with changes in body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) is mediated by physical activity in ageing African women.Entities:
Keywords: African women; Body mass index; Physical activity; Sitting time; Socioeconomic status; Urban; Waist circumference
Year: 2018 PMID: 29725487 PMCID: PMC5921976 DOI: 10.1186/s11556-018-0196-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Rev Aging Phys Act ISSN: 1813-7253 Impact factor: 3.878
Sample characteristics of urbanised black South African women living in Soweto
| Baseline | Follow-up | Net change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 41.4 ± 5.8 | 49.3 ± 5.3 | + 7.9 | < 0.0001 |
| Height (m) | 1.58 ± 0.05 | – | – | – |
| Weight (kg) | 76.1 ± 15.1 | 80.5 ± 16.3 | + 4.4 | < 0.0001 |
| BMI (kg.m−2) | 31 ± 6.7 | 33.3 ± 7.4 | + 2.3 | < 0.0001 |
| BMI ≥ 30 kg.m− 2, % | 52.2 (48.1, 56.4) | 67.4 (63.4, 71.2) | + 15.2 | < 0.0001 |
| WC (cm) | 88 ± 13.3 | 98.9 ± 14.6 | + 10.9 | < 0.0001 |
| Central obesity, WC ≥ 80 cm, % | 72 (68, 75.6) | 90 (87.2, 92.2) | + 18 | < 0.0001 |
| MVPA (mins./week) | 350 (150, 1230) | 240 (60, 1035) | −110 | 0.57 |
| Sitting time (mins./week) | 1260 (840, 2100) | 690 (510, 915) | − 570 | < 0.0001 |
Data presented as mean ± SD or percentage (%) (95% CIs) or median (interquartile range); + increase; − decrease
BMI body mass index; MVPA moderate-vigorous physical activity; WC waist circumference; Paired t-tests were used to describe the difference in baseline and follow-up values
Correlation between physical activity, socioeconomic status parameters and endogenous factors used in the structural equation modelling
| Parameter | BMIb | WCb | MVPAb | Sitting timeb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agea | − 0.14 (0.001) | − 0.09 (0.03) | − 0.01 (0.82) | 0.02 (0.67) |
| BMIa | − 0.07 (0.12) | – | − 0.02 (0.78) | 0.06 (0.62) |
| WCa | – | − 0.19 (< 0.0001) | − 0.02 (0.61) | 0.04 (0.46) |
| MVPAa | −0.03 (0.54) | − 0.01 (0.14) | − 0.68 (< 0.0001) | −0.14 (0.005) |
| MVPAb | −0.03 (0.54) | −0.01 (0.76) | – | 0.13 (0.006) |
| Sitting timea | 0.02 (0.64) | 0.07 (0.16) | −0.12 (0.01) | 0.92 (< 0.0001) |
| Sitting timeb | −0.01 (0.76) | −0.06 (0.25) | 0.13 (0.006) | – |
| SES scorea | 0.13 (0.002) | 0.08 (0.07) | −0.08 (0.09) | 0.04 (0.47) |
Data are presented as r (p-value)
BMI body mass index; MVPA moderate-vigorous physical activity; SES socioeconomic status; WC waist circumference
aBaseline values
bChange values
Structural equation models for the relationship between socioeconomic status, MVPA, and sitting time on changes in BMI and WC in urban black South African women
| Effect of: | Outcomes: | Direct effects | Indirect effects | Total effects | Proportion of total effect mediated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SESb | BMIc via MVPAb | 0.022 (0.003; 0.041)* | 0.0006 (−0.0022; 0.0035) | 0.0226 (0.0038; 0.0413)* | 0.03 |
| MVPAc via BMIb | −3.81 (−6.92; −0.70)* | −0.39 (−4.84; 4.06) | −4.20 (−9.63; 1.22) | 0.1 | |
| Sittingc via WCb | 1.08 (−0.83; 2.98) | 0.07 (−4.73; 4.86)* | 1.14 (−4.02; 6.30) | 0.06 | |
| MVPAb | BMIc via MVPAc | −0.0004 (−.001; 0.000) | 0.0003 (0.0003; 0.0003)*** | −0.0001 (− 0.0007; 0.0004) | 0.43a |
| WCc via MVPAc | −0.002 (− 0.003; − 0.0003)* | 0.01 (0.001; 0.001)*** | −0.001 (− 0.002; 0.001) | 10a | |
| MVPAc via BMIb | −0.87 (− 0.92; − 0.82)*** | −0.0003 (− 0.0009; 0.0004) | −0.87 (− 0.92; − 0.82)*** | 0.0003 | |
| MVPAc via WCb | − 0.87 (− 0.92; − 0.82)*** | −0.0008 (− 0.004; 0.002) | −0.87 (− 0.92; − 0.82)*** | 0.001a | |
| Sittingb | BMIc | − 0.0002 (− 0.0009; 0.001) | 0.0001 (0.0001; 0.0002)*** | −0.00002 (− 0.0008; 0.001) | 5.00a |
| WCc via Sittingc | −0.0004 (− 0.002; 0.001) | 0.0006 (0.0005; 0.001)*** | 0.0002 (− 0.002; 0.002) | 3.00 | |
| Sittingc via WCb | −0.84 (− 0.86; − 0.81)*** | 0.0004 (− 0.0005; 0.001) | −0.84 (− 0.86; 0.81)*** | 0.001a | |
| WCb | WCc | −0.12 (− 0.18; − 0.05)*** | 0.003 (− 0.002; 0.09) | −2.45 (− 6.56; 1.67) | 0.001a |
| WCc via Sittingc | −0.11 (− 0.17; − 0.05)*** | 0.0006 (− 0.001; 0.002) | −0.11 (− 0.17; − 0.05)*** | 0.01a | |
| MVPAc | WCc | − 0.001 (− 0.003; − 0.00004)* | −0.001 (− 0.003; − 0.00004)* |
Data in parentheses are 95% CIs; All models were adjusted for age
MVPA moderate to vigorous physical activity, BMI body mass index, SES socioeconomic status, WC waist circumference
*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001
aAssessed using the absolute values for both indirect and direct effects
bBaseline values
cChange values
Fit indices for the structural equation model
| Model |
| Prob > | RMSEA | CFI | TLI | SRMR | CD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES and MVPA on BMIa | 1.77 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.006 | 0.06 |
| SES and sitting time on BMIa | 3.57 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.006 | 0.05 |
| SES and MVPA on WCa | 1.02 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 0.005 | 0.04 |
| SES and sitting time on WCa | 3.16 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.006 | 0.03 |
RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker Lewis Index, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual, CD Coefficient of Determination, BMI body mass index, WC waist circumference, SES socioeconomic status
aChange values; X2 = Chi-squared test of fit model
Fig. 1a, b, c and d: Path diagram of the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with change in body mass index (BMI) via baseline (b) and change (∆) in moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (a) and via sitting timeb∆ (b); and the association of baseline SES with change in waist circumference (WC) via MVPA b∆ (c) and sitting time b∆ (d)