| Literature DB >> 29725474 |
Yuxue Gao1, Lihong Shi2, Zhen Cao1, Xuetao Zhu1, Feng Li1, Ruyan Wang1, Jinyuan Xu1, Jinyi Zhong1, Baogang Zhang3, Shijun Lu3.
Abstract
Telocinobufagin (TBG), an active ingredient of Venenumbufonis, exhibits an immunomodulatory activity. However, its antimetastatic activity in breast cancer remains unknown. The present study investigated whether TBG prevents breast cancer metastasis and evaluated its regulatory mechanism. TBG inhibited the migration and invasion of 4T1 breast cancer cells. Furthermore, TBG triggered the collapse of F-actin filaments in breast cancer. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers, vimentin and fibronectin, were downregulated following TBG treatment. However, E-cadherin was upregulated following TBG treatment. Snail, a crucial transcriptional factor of EMT, was downregulated following TBG treatment. Signaling pathway markers, including phosphorylated protein kinase B (P-Akt), p-mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and p-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), were decreased following TBG treatment. The same results were obtained from in vivo experiments. In conclusion, in vitro and in vivo experiments reveal that TBG inhibited migration, invasion and EMT via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/ERK/Snail signaling pathway in breast cancer.Entities:
Keywords: epithelial-mesenchymal transition; invasion; migration; snail; telocinobufagin
Year: 2018 PMID: 29725474 PMCID: PMC5920466 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8349
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.TBG suppressed the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells. (A) The chemical structure of TBG. (B) TBG exhibited no significant proliferation inhibition at reasonable concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 µg/ml). (C) TBG suppressed the migration of 4T1 cells at the indicated concentrations. The images are derived from the same field of view. (D) TBG suppressed the migration of 4T1 cells at the indicated concentrations. (E) TBG suppressed the invasion of 4T1 cells at the indicated concentrations. (F) TBG suppressed the migration and invasion in 4T1 cells at the indicated concentrations. (G) TBG did not change cell morphological characteristics. *P<0.05 compared with control. TBG, telocinobufagin.
Figure 2.TBG induced disintegration of F-actin filaments in the cytoskeleton. (A) TBG induced disintegration of F-actin filaments of the cytoskeleton in a time-dependent manner. (B) F-actin levels were decreased with TBG treatment. TBG, telocinobufagin. *P<0.05 vs. control.
Figure 3.TBG regulated EMT markers via the Akt/ERK/Snail pathway. (A) The EMT markers were changed following TBG treatment, as determined by western blot analysis. Graphs are indicative of relative band intensity normalized to β-actin. **P<0.05 vs. control. (B) The EMT markers were changed following TBG treatment, as visualized by immunofluorescence. Red represents E-cadherin, and green represents fibronectin and vimentin. (C) TBG inhibited the transcriptional factor Snail. Graphsare indicative of relative band intensity normalized to β-actin. *P<0.05 vs. control. (D) TBG inhibited the Akt/ERK signaling pathway elements in breast cancer cells. Graphs are indicative of relative band intensity normalized to β-actin. *P<0.05 vs. control. TBG, telocinobufagin; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; Akt, protein kinase B; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.
Figure 4.The anti-metastatic effect of TBG in a mouse 4T1 breast tumor model. (A) The body weight of mice was measured 2 times a week and the wet tumor weight was calculated. *P<0.05 vs. control. The results are presented as themean ± standard error of the mean. (B) Histopathological images of lung sections. Arrows indicate the tumor cells in nodules. (C) Immunohistochemical staining for EMT markers in tumor sections. (D) Immunohistochemical staining for Akt/ERK signaling pathway elements in tumor sections. TBG, telocinobufagin; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; Akt, protein kinase B; ERK, extracellular signal-related kinase.