| Literature DB >> 29725332 |
Timm Hoeres1, Manfred Smetak1, Dominik Pretscher1, Martin Wilhelm1.
Abstract
Increasing immunological knowledge and advances in techniques lay the ground for more efficient and broader application of immunotherapies. gamma delta (γδ) T-cells possess multiple favorable anti-tumor characteristics, making them promising candidates to be used in cellular and combination therapies of cancer. They recognize malignant cells, infiltrate tumors, and depict strong cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory activity. Here, we focus on human Vγ9Vδ2 T-cells, the most abundant γδ T-cell subpopulation in the blood, which are able to inhibit cancer progression in various models in vitro and in vivo. For therapeutic use they can be cultured and manipulated ex vivo and in the following adoptively transferred to patients, as well as directly stimulated to propagate in vivo. In clinical studies, Vγ9Vδ2 T-cells repeatedly demonstrated a low toxicity profile but hitherto only the modest therapeutic efficacy. This review provides a comprehensive summary of established and newer strategies for the enhancement of Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell anti-tumor functions. We discuss data of studies exploring methods for the sensitization of malignant cells, the improvement of recognition mechanisms and cytotoxic activity of Vγ9Vδ2 T-cells. Main aspects are the tumor cell metabolism, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, antibody constructs, as well as activating and inhibitory receptors like NKG2D and immune checkpoint molecules. Several concepts show promising results in vitro, now awaiting translation to in vivo models and clinical studies. Given the array of research and encouraging findings in this area, this review aims at optimizing future investigations, specifically targeting the unanswered questions.Entities:
Keywords: ADCC; NKG2D; cancer immunotherapy; gamma delta T-cell; immune checkpoints; programmed cell death protein 1; tumor metabolism; vascular endothelial growth factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29725332 PMCID: PMC5916964 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Clinical studies.
| Reference | Year | Disease | Reported outcome | Systemic therapy/comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilhelm et al. ( | 2003 | MM, indolent, lymphomas | 19 | 16% PR, 16% SD | +PAM +IL-2/response correlates with |
| Dieli et al. ( | 2007 | HRPC | 18 | 16% PR, 27% SD | +ZOL +IL-2 |
| Bennouna et al. ( | 2010 | RCC, GYN-, GI-cancers | 28 | 42% SD | +BrHPP +IL-2 |
| Laurent et al. ( | 2010 | Follicular lymhoma | 45 | 26% CR, 18% PR | +BrHPP +IL-2 +RTX |
| Meraviglia et al. ( | 2010 | Breast cancer | 10 | 10% PR, 20% SD | +ZOL +IL-2/response correlates with |
| Lang et al. ( | 2011 | RCC | 12 | 16% SD | +ZOL +IL-2 |
| Kunzmann et al. ( | 2012 | RCC, melanoma, AML | 21 | 16–42% SD | +ZOL +IL-2 |
| AML: 25% PR | |||||
| Pressey et al. ( | 2016 | Neuroblastoma | 4 | 25% SD, 75% PD | +ZOL +IL-2 |
| Kobayashi et al. ( | 2007 | RCC | 7 | Delayed tumor doubling times in 4/7 patients | – |
| Bennouna et al. ( | 2008 | RCC | 10 | 60% SD | – |
| Abe et al. ( | 2009 | MM | 6 | 66% SD | – |
| Nakajima et al. ( | 2010 | Lung cancer | 10 | 30% SD | – |
| Kobayashi ( | 2011 | RCC | 11 | 9% CR, 45% SD | +ZOL +IL-2 |
| Nicol et al. ( | 2011 | Solid tumors | 18 | 16% SD, 16% PR and CR | +ZOL +other tumor-specific treatments |
| Noguchi et al. ( | 2011 | Solid tumors | 25 | 12% SD, 12% PR | +other tumor-specific treatments |
| Sakamoto et al. ( | 2011 | Lung cancer | 15 | 40% SD | – |
| Cui et al. ( | 2014 | HCC | 62 | Longer PFS and OS | –/in addition to radiofrequency ablation |
| Wilhelm et al. ( | 2014 | Hematological malignancies | 4 | 75% CR | +ZOL +IL-2 +Chemo/ |
| Wada et al. ( | 2014 | Gastric cancer | 7 | Reduction in ascites in 2/7 patients | –/intraperitoneal administration of γδ T-cells |
| Aoki et al. ( | 2017 | Pancreatic cancer—adjuvant | 28 | Higher recurrence free survival in patients with sustained higher γδ T-cell numbers | +Chemo |
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; BrHPP, bromohydrin pyrophosphate; Chemo, chemotherapy; CR, complete remission, GI, gastrointestinal; GYN, gynecological; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HRPC, hormone refractory prostate cancer; MM, multiple myeloma; N, number of patients; OS, overall survival; PAM, pamidronic acid; PD, progressive disease; PFS, progression free survival; PR, partial remission; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RTX, rituximab; SD, stable disease; ZOL, zoledronic acid.
Figure 1Strategies for the inhibition of pro-tumor and the enhancement of anti-tumor effects. Overview of the local tumor microenvironment that illustrates important immune cell interactions and exemplary types of therapeutic interventions facilitating anti-tumor activity. Following their migration from blood to tissue, γδ T-cells may interact with macrophages and exhibit local pro- but also anti-tumor effects. Possible therapeutic strategies aiming to improve the recognition and killing of cancer cells by γδ T-cells as well as those intended to antagonize immunosuppressive receptor signaling and molecules are listed under points 1–7. Abbreviations: BrHPP, bromohydrin pyrophosphate; DCA, dichloroacetate; (G)M-CSFR, (granulocyte-)macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IL-2R, interleukin-2 receptor; LA, lactic acid; mAb, monoclonal antibody; Mφ, macrophage/monocyte lineage cell; N-BP, amino-bisphosphonates; NKG2DL, NKG2D ligands; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PAg, phosphoantigens; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1/2, programmed death-ligand 1/2; sVEGFR-1, soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; TA, tumor antigen; TCR-complex, T-cell receptor complex; TMZ, temozolomide; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.