Literature DB >> 29725276

Soft lithography fabrication of index-matched microfluidic devices for reducing artifacts in fluorescence and quantitative phase imaging.

Diane N H Kim1, Kevin T Kim2, Carolyn Kim1, Michael A Teitell1,3, Thomas A Zangle4.   

Abstract

Microfluidic devices are widely used for biomedical applications based on microscopy or other optical detection methods. However, the materials commonly used for microfabrication typically have a high refractive index relative to water, which can create artifacts at device edges and limit applicability to applications requiring high precision imaging or morphological feature detection. Here we present a soft lithography method to fabricate microfluidic devices out of MY133-V2000, a UV-curable, fluorinated polymer with low refractive index that is close to that of water (n = 1.33). The primary challenge in the use of this material (and fluorinated materials in general) is the low adhesion of the fluorinated material; we present several alternative fabrication methods we have tested to improve inter-layer adhesion. The close match between the refractive index of this material and aqueous solutions commonly used in biomedical applications enables fluorescence imaging at microchannel or other microfabricated edges without distortion. The close match in refractive index also enables quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) imaging across the full width of microchannels without error-inducing artifacts for measurement of cell biomass. Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of low-refractive index microfluidics for biological applications requiring high precision optical imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorescence imaging; Microfabrication; Microfluidic device; Quantitative phase imaging; Refractive index

Year:  2017        PMID: 29725276      PMCID: PMC5927392          DOI: 10.1007/s10404-017-2023-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microfluid Nanofluidics        ISSN: 1613-4982            Impact factor:   2.529


  45 in total

Review 1.  Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental techniques, and effects on separations.

Authors:  Brian J Kirby; Ernest F Hasselbrink
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Microfluidic large-scale integration.

Authors:  Todd Thorsen; Sebastian J Maerkl; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  An integrated microfluidic biochemical detection system for protein analysis with magnetic bead-based sampling capabilities.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Choi; Kwang W Oh; Jennifer H Thomas; William R Heineman; H Brian Halsall; Joseph H Nevin; Arthur J Helmicki; H Thurman Henderson; Chong H Ahn
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Microfluidic sorting of mammalian cells by optical force switching.

Authors:  Mark M Wang; Eugene Tu; Daniel E Raymond; Joon Mo Yang; Haichuan Zhang; Norbert Hagen; Bob Dees; Elinore M Mercer; Anita H Forster; Ilona Kariv; Philippe J Marchand; William F Butler
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-12-19       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Live cell refractometry using microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Niyom Lue; Gabriel Popescu; Takahiro Ikeda; Ramachandra R Dasari; Kamran Badizadegan; Michael S Feld
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 6.  New technologies for measuring single cell mass.

Authors:  Gabriel Popescu; Kidong Park; Mustafa Mir; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry for quantitative phase microscopy of living cells.

Authors:  Pierre Bon; Guillaume Maucort; Benoit Wattellier; Serge Monneret
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Rapidly quantifying drug sensitivity of dispersed and clumped breast cancer cells by mass profiling.

Authors:  Jennifer Chun; Thomas A Zangle; Theodora Kolarova; Richard S Finn; Michael A Teitell; Jason Reed
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.616

9.  On the propagation of concentration polarization from microchannel-nanochannel interfaces. Part II: Numerical and experimental study.

Authors:  Thomas A Zangle; Ali Mani; Juan G Santiago
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.882

10.  Scaling and automation of a high-throughput single-cell-derived tumor sphere assay chip.

Authors:  Yu-Heng Cheng; Yu-Chih Chen; Riley Brien; Euisik Yoon
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  5 in total

1.  Fabrication of Refractive-index-matched Devices for Biomedical Microfluidics.

Authors:  Edward R Polanco; Nicholas Western; Thomas A Zangle
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Fabrication and Bonding of Refractive Index Matched Microfluidics for Precise Measurements of Cell Mass.

Authors:  Edward R Polanco; Justin Griffin; Thomas A Zangle
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 3.  Microscopic Imaging Methods for Organ-on-a-Chip Platforms.

Authors:  Bailey C Buchanan; Jeong-Yeol Yoon
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  A polymer index-matched to water enables diverse applications in fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Xiaofei Han; Yijun Su; Hamilton White; Kate M O'Neill; Nicole Y Morgan; Ryan Christensen; Deepika Potarazu; Harshad D Vishwasrao; Stephen Xu; Yilun Sun; Shar-Yin Huang; Mark W Moyle; Qionghai Dai; Yves Pommier; Edward Giniger; Dirk R Albrecht; Roland Probst; Hari Shroff
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 5.  Recent Studies on Fluorinated Silica Nanometer-Sized Particles.

Authors:  Scott T Iacono; Abby R Jennings
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.