Literature DB >> 29725233

Biogenic Amine Formation in "Bez Sucuk," a Type of Turkish Traditional Fermented Sausage Produced with Different Meat: Fat Ratios.

Ümran Çiçek1, Kader Tokatli1.   

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate biogenic amine levels of bez sucuks (BS) produced with different meat:fat ratios. For this, three BS groups were manufactured with meat:fat ratios of 90:10 (BS10), 80:20 (BS20), and 70:30 (BS30). The pH and water activity values and biogenic amine amounts of sucuk samples were determined during processing and storage periods and the pH values of the initial mixtures of BS samples were in the range 5.51-5.74, decreasing to 4.72-4.94 by the 14th day. The water activity values of BS samples showed significant decreases as a result of the drying stage and reached to range 0.913-0.935 on the 14th day of processing (p<0.05). Although BS10 had the highest tyramine (434.12 mg/kg), histamine (5.69 mg/kg), cadaverine (12.48 mg/kg), putrescine (17.83 mg/kg), 2-phenylethylamine (15.43 mg/kg), and tryptamine (122.41 mg/kg) levels at the end of processing stage (p<0.05), spermine and spermidine levels did not differ between the BS samples due to their utilization of different meat:fat ratios (p>0.05). Similarly, the tryptamine (205.11 mg/kg), putrescine (43.57 mg/kg), and tyramine (766.23 mg/kg) levels of BS10 were higher than BS20 and BS30 samples at the end of storage (p<0.05). The results showed that BS10 with the highest meat ratio had the highest tryptamine, putrescine, and tyramine levels at the end of the processing and storage period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bez sucuk; histamine; spontaneous fermentation; tryptamine; tyramine

Year:  2018        PMID: 29725233      PMCID: PMC5932960          DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.1.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour        ISSN: 1225-8563            Impact factor:   2.622


Introduction

Biogenic amines (BA) are nitrogenous compounds that can be classified as aliphatic, aromatic, or heterocyclic amines according to their chemical structures (Bozkurt and Erkmen, 2007; Gençcelep et al., 2007; Papavergou et al., 2012; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003; Tosukhowong et al., 2011). In general, BAs are naturally found in various foods such as cheeses, fermented fish, meat products, and wine due to the amino acid decarboxylase activity of Pseudomonas, Enterobacteriaceae, and Lactobacilli (Baka et al., 2011; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003). The most important BAs in fermented foods are histamine, putrescine, cadaverine, tyramine, tryptamine, 2-phenylethylamine, spermine, and spermidine (Bover-Cid et al., 2001a; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003; Tosukhowong et al., 2011). Histamine, putrescine, tyramine, and cadaverine are the most prevalent BAs in fermented sausages; moreover, high levels of these BAs can be found in fermented sausages produced from raw materials (beef, pork, turkey meat, etc.) that have high protein content (Latorre-Moratalla et al., 2010; Papavergou, 2011; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003). Bez sucuk (BS), which is a type of Turkish fermented beef sausage, differs from other Turkish-type fermented sausages due to the use of cloth casings sewn to size of 7 × 25 cm from uncolored cloth with 42 threads per cm2. Although these products are mainly produced by butchers and small-scale facilities that utilize traditional technologies without adding starter cultures, a few manufacturers use curing agents such as sodium nitrite. In addition, the formulation (meat:fat ratio and seasonings) and process conditions (temperature, humidity, and ripening period) of the BS show differences between manufacturers (Çiçek and Köse, 2016). However, BS generally has three production stages: mixing the sucuk batter, filling the cloth casings, and ripening for 10-14 days (Çiçek and Köse, 2016; Çiçek and Polat, 2016). During the ripening stage for fermented sausages such as BS, lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates undergo various chemical and microbiological degradation reactions (Ensoy et al., 2010; Karslıoğlu et al., 2014; Papavergou, 2011). Although the proteolysis reactions during the ripening stage resulted in increased free amino acids, which are the precursors of BAs formation (Baka et al., 2011; Bover-Cid et al., 1999a; Karslıoğlu et al., 2014; Papavergou, 2011), the microbial counts of raw materials, process conditions, utilizing starter cultures, additives (antimicrobial agents), and the pH drop during fermentation stage affects the BA formation in fermented sausages (Bover-Cid et al., 2001a; Bozkurt and Erkmen, 2007; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003). Furthermore, the extended proteolytic reactions during ripening and storage periods with both a low pH value and high counts of bacteria having decarboxylase activity may enhance the accumulation of BAs in fermented sausages (Bover-Cid et al., 1999b; Papavergou, 2011; Papavergou et al., 2012; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003); moreover, BAs may also result from the decarboxylation activity of spoiling bacteria during the storage period (Bover-Cid et al., 2001b; Bozkurt and Erkmen, 2007; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003). Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the BA levels of fermented meat products, particularly fermented sausages. The BA amounts of these products are also important from the perspective of human health. Many researchers have reported that the consumption of foods with high levels of BAs may cause various types of foodborne diseases such as hypotension, migraine, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, etc. (Bover-Cid et al., 1999a; Casquete et al., 2011; Gençcelep et al., 2007; Komprda et al., 2001; Latorre-Moratalla et al., 2008; Papavergou, 2011; Papavergou et al., 2012; Tosukhowong et al., 2011). Additionally, cadaverine and histamine levels have been proposed as chemical indicators of meat spoilage and the hygienic conditions of the manufacturing practices of fermented sausages (Bozkurt and Erkmen, 2007; Komprda et al., 2001; Tosukhowong et al., 2011); meanwhile, there is only a legal upper limit for histamine: 100 mg per kg of food (Bozkurt and Erkmen, 2002; Latorre-Moratalla et al., 2008). The BA levels of Turkish fermented sausages that have natural or collagen casings have been investigated. Although the formulation and processing conditions of BS show differences between manufacturers and casing sewn from uncolored cloth, no study has assessed the BA levels of BS, particularly in those manufactured with different meat:fat ratios. According to the TS 1070 Turkish Sucuk (fermented sausage) Standard (Anonymous, 2002), the maximum fat contents of first, second, and third quality sucuks are limited to 35%, 40%, and 40%, respectively. In addition, according to the Turkish Food Codex-Meat Products Communique (Anonymous, 2012) the maximum fat content of fermented sausages is limited to 40%. After producing BS in accordance with both food legislation and sucuk standards, the current study aimed to determine the effects of different meat:fat ratios and the process stages/storage periods on the formation of BAs in BS.

Materials and Methods

Sausage production

In this study, experimental BS production was repeated three times, and three groups of BS named BS10, BS20, and BS30 were manufactured with respective meat:fat ratios of 90:10, 80:20, and 70:30. Cubed beef meat was subdivided into three groups and combined with salt (1.6%), garlic (2%), cumin (0.8%), hot red pepper (0.8%), red pepper (0.6%), black pepper (0.4%), sucrose (0.5%), and allspice (0.2%) using a Mainca 400 mixer (Germany). Following the mixing stage, all sucuk mixtures were stored at 4℃ for 12 hours (initial mixture). Sheep tail fat was added to all sucuk batters to the meat:fat ratios mentioned above and ground twice using a grinding machine (Turkey). After grinding, cloth casings were filled with sucuk mixtures using a filling machine from Mainca EM-20 (Germany). Sucuk batons were hung on stainless steel and ripened for 14 days. The ripening steps were as follows: (step 1) at 22℃, 90% relative humidity for 48 h; (step 2) at 22℃, 85% relative humidity for 48 h; (step 3) at 20℃, 80% relative humidity for 72 h; (step 4) at 18℃, 75% relative humidity for 72 h; (step 5) at 18℃, 60% relative humidity for 96 h. During the ripening stage, all sucuk samples were pressed for three times and following the ripening stage, all sucuk samples were vacuum packed using a vacuum machine from La Minerva Pack 10B (Italy), and then stored at 4℃ for six months. Three randomly selected sucuk samples were removed during processing (initial mixture, 2nd day, 4th day, 10th day, and 14th day) and storage periods (day 0, 30th day, 60th day, 90th day, 120th day, and 180th day) for further analysis.

Methods

pH and water activity values (aw)

The pH of the sample was determined using an Orion 420A pH-meter that was calibrated using standard buffer solutions at pH 4 and 7. The water activity values of samples were measured using AquaLab Series 3 TE model (USA) at each sampling stage (Çiçek et al., 2015).

Biogenic amine levels

The biogenic amine amounts of samples were analyzed using the method of Bozkurt and Erkmen (2002). The HPLC system, which consisted of a PerkinElmer Series 200 model UV/VIS Detector (USA), PerkinElmer Series 200 model pump (USA) and PerkinElmer Series 200 model Peltier column oven (USA) was used. The column was Waters Spherisorb® 10.0 μm, ODS2 (4.6 × 200 mm) (USA). Acetonitrile (solvent A) and 0.1 M ammonium acetate (solvent B) were the mobile phases (flow rate: 1 mL/min). The standard solution of the dansylated derivatives of tryptamine, 2-phenylethylamine, putrescine, cadaverine, histamine, tyramine, spermidine and spermine (SIGMA) was used and all standards were diluted to 1 mL using 0.4 perchloric acid to give concentrations in the range 0.5-10 mg/mL.

Statistical analysis

The data were statistically analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 statistical package (International Business Machines Corporation [IBM] Armonk, USA). Mean values for different meat:fat ratios and manufacturing/storage periods were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan multiple post hoc comparison test to evaluate statistical significance between the means (p<0.05). Comparison of means for BS groups and sampling stages was done for every tested variable. Standard deviation (SD) values are presented alongside the means in tables.

Results and Discussions

pH and water activity (aw) values

The results showed that the pH values of BS decreased during the ripening stages (p<0.05) and reached the lowest values on day 4 due to the acidification activity of lactic acid bacteria (p<0.05). The occurrence of proteolytic activity during the ripening stage resulted in the formation of ammonia and amine, which slightly increased the pH values of BS10, BS20, and BS30 to 4.94, 4.78, and 4.72, respectively. Although all sucuk formulations were prepared with the same sucrose amount of 0.5%, the highest pH value was measured in BS10 on day 14 (p<0.05) (Table 1). This difference could be the result of proteolysis reactions in BS10 having the highest meat ratio among the three. It has been stated that sugar addition with certain concentrations to the sausage mixture can improve the rapid acidification, which limits the decarboxylase activity of bacteria (Gonzalez et al., 2003; Latorre-Moratalla et al., 2010). Similar rapid pH decreases in all BS groups were also achieved with sucrose addition to BS formulations. However, Latorre-Moratalla et al. (2010) stated that sugar addition did not result in rapid pH decreases in fermented sausages and higher amounts of sugar promoted the decarboxylase activity of aminogenic microorganisms. During the storage periods, the pH values of BS groups showed slight increases and decreases, and measured 5.21, 4.91, and 4.69 on day 180 for BS10, BS20, and BS30, respectively (Table 1). It was seen that BS10 had the highest pH value among the three (p<0.05).
Table 1.

pH and water activity (aw) values of bez sucuks during processing stages and storage periods1)

BS102)BS20BS30

pHawpHawpHaw
Process stages (day)

Initial mixture5.51 ± 0.21Aa0.978 ± 0.007Aa5.61 ± 0.21Aa0.976 ± 0.005Aa5.74 ± 0.26Aa0.973 ± 0.005Aa
24.89 ± 0.20Bb0.972 ± 0.004BAa5.06 ± 0.11ABb0.974 ± 0.005Aa5.16 ± 0.19Ab0.971 ± 0.005Aa
44.67 ± 0.14Ac0.968 ± 0.003Bb4.74 ± 0.10Ad0.971 ± 0.00Aa4.76 ± 0.13Ac0.967 ± 0.002Ba
105.04 ± 0.16Ab0.964 ± 0.005Ac4.90 ± 0.07Bc0.949 ± 0.006Ab4.84 ± 0.08Bc0.949 ± 0.005Ab
144.94 ± 0.13Ab0.913 ± 0.017Bd4.78 ± 0.06Bd0.922 ± 0.015ABc4.72 ± 0.07Bc0.935 ± 0.016Ac

Storage periods (day)

04.94 ± 0.13Ab0.913 ± 0.017Ba4.78 ± 0.06Bb0.920 ± 0.015ABab4.72 ± 0.07Bbc0.935 ± 0.016Aa
305.26 ± 0.24Aa0.897 ± 0.012Bb5.04 ± 0.59Ba0.908 ± 0.015ABcd4.98 ± 0.18Ba0.920 ± 0.009Ab
605.10 ± 0.05Aab0.907 ± 0.006Cab4.83 ± 0.23Bb0.916 ± 0.008Babc4.65 ± 0.25Bc0.927 ± 0.008Aab
905.23 ± 0.04Aa0.904 ± 0.004Cab5.04 ± 0.22Ba0.923 ± 0.005Ba4.85 ± 0.16Cab0.935 ± 0.006Aa
1205.23 ± 0.32Aa0.896 ± 0.009Cb5.01 ± 0.27ABa0.909 ± 0.010Bcd4.80 ± 0.18Bbc0.926 ± 0.011Aab
1505.12 ± 0.17Aa0.900 ± 0.008Bb4.87 ± 0.10Bab0.901 ± 0.008Bd4.67 ± 0.03Cc0.918 ± 0.010Ab
1805.21 ± 0.07Aa0.905 ± 0.004Bab4.91 ± 0.11Bab0.911 ± 0.007Bbcd4.69 ± 0.13Cbc0.923 ± 0.005Ab

1)Data ± standard deviation (n=6).

2)BS10: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 90:10; BS20: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 80:20; BS30: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 70:30.

a-dMeans in a column of each group not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05).

A-CMeans in a row of same processing stage not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05).

1)Data ± standard deviation (n=6). 2)BS10: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 90:10; BS20: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 80:20; BS30: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 70:30. a-dMeans in a column of each group not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05). A-CMeans in a row of same processing stage not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05). The initial aw values of the sucuk mixtures were 0.973-0.978 and reached 0.913-0.935 due to the increasing acidity and water release at the end of the ripening stage (p<0.05) (Table 1). It was observed that BS10 had the lowest aw value on the 14th day (p<0.05). Although all sucuk samples were vacuum packaged, the aw values of BS showed differences between the storage periods due to sampling (p<0.05) and measured 0.905, 0.911, and 0.923 on day 180 for BS10, BS20, and BS30, respectively (p<0.05) (Table 1). The levels of BAs measured in BS groups during the processing stages and storage periods are given in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The spermine levels of the initial mixtures of BS groups were in the range 282.77-343.73 mg/kg (p<0.05) (Table 2). Many researchers noted that spermine and spermidine could be present at high levels in fresh meat used for fermented sausage manufacturing (Papavergou, 2011; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003). Papavergou et al. (2012) also stated that continued intake of foods with high amounts of spermine and spermidine may cause the facilitation of a food allergy. Spermine levels in BS groups showed slight decreases and increases during processing stages, and spermine levels were measured as 343.34, 306.95, and 321.63 mg/kg on day 14 for BS10, BS20, and BS30, respectively (Table 2). Bover-Cid et al. (1999b) also reported similar fluctuations in spermine levels during the ripening of dry fermented sausages. Contrary to our results, Kurt and Zorba (2009) stated that increasing the ripening period of sucuks resulted in higher spermine accumulation. In agreement with the results of current study, Roseiro et al. (2010) stated that spermine levels were higher than spermidine levels. The spermidine levels of BS groups increased during processing stages and reached 202.70, 141.79, and 188.42 mg/kg for BS10, BS20, and BS30, respectively (p<0.05) (Table 2). Kurt and Zorba (2009) also noted similar increases during processing stages. Utilizing different meat:fat ratios did not affect spermine and spermidine levels among BS groups on day 14 (p>0.05). Although the spermidine levels of all BS samples showed significant decreases and increases during storage periods (p<0.05), the changes in spermine levels for BS10 and BS20 were found to be significant (p<0.05) (Table 3). However, Bozkurt and Erkmen (2002) reported significant decreases in spermine concentrations for Turkish sucuks during storage.
Table 2.

Biogenic amine levels of bez sucuks during processing stages (mg/kg)1)

GroupProcess stage (day)Tryptamine2-Phenyl ethylaminePutrescineCadaverineHistamineTyramineSpermidineSpermine
BS102)Initial mixture23.18 ± 6.74Ab5.10 ± 2.33Aab0.50 ± 0.44Ac0.67 ± 0.13Ab0.48 ± 0.20Ad2.05 ± 1.28Ad13.29 ± 2.65Ac343.73 ± 14.49Aa
241.67 ± 0.73AbND3)0.56 ± 0.46Ac2.20 ± 1.23Ab0.62 ± 0.12Ad95.55 ± 18.90Bcd62.74 ± 6.11Abc339.40 ± 7.48Aa
440.26 ± 16.51Ab7.74 ± 5.58Aab1.87 ± 0.51Ac3.82 ± 0.78ABb2.29 ± 0.18Ac166.28 ± 37.93Abc125.62 ± 28.00Ab306.95 ± 43.42Aab
1059.75 ± 34.57Ab14.78 ± 7.64Aa9.05 ± 4.66Ab13.13 ± 2.25Aa3.60 ± 0.01Ab247.36 ± 100.43ABb213.23 ± 61.57Aa245.38 ± 93.87Ab
14122.41 ± 23.08Aa15.43 ± 12.87Aa17.83 ± 2.40Aa12.48 ± 4.72Aa5.69 ± 0.26Aa434.12 ± 83.20Aa202.70 ± 77.38Aa343.34 ± 48.83Aa
BS20Initial mixture16.78 ± 3.19Ab2.28 ± 1.11Bb0.22 ± 0.03Ab0.78 ± 0.10Ac0.39 ± 0.13Ab0.95 ± 0.46Ac8.66 ± 3.22Bb298.10 ± 11.11Ba
234.42 ± 14.15AbND0.45 ± 0.22Ab4.00 ± 2.55Ab0.38 ± 0.11Bb124.13 ± 22.39Ab146.70 ± 96.45Aa305.51 ± 79.76ABa
441.83 ± 10.21Ab0.27 ± 0.67Bc1.74 ± 1.27Ab4.36 ± 1.16Ab0.80 ± 0.20Bb144.97 ± 27.15Ab118.66 ± 5.84ABa295.76 ± 32.81Aa
1074.98 ± 14.24Aa18.66 ± 3.53Aa9.06 ± 3.43Aa8.80 ± 1.51Ba2.16 ± 0.81Ba311.48 ± 33.88Aa158.44 ± 76.99ABa321.42 ± 8.25Aa
1473.32 ± 32.05BaND10.34 ± 4.20Ba8.54 ± 1.56Ba2.70 ± 0.04Ba303.65 ± 82.53Ba141.79 ± 44.75Aa306.95 ± 41.37Aa
BS30Initial mixture14.52 ± 0.45Abc1.13 ± 0.67Bb0.23 ± 0.03Ac0.90 ± 0.38Ac0.59 ± 0.52Aa1.92 ± 0.30Ae6.31 ± 2.11Bc282.77 ± 31.70Bab
2NDND0.23 ± 0.08Ac1.70 ± 1.06Abc0.31 ± 0.02Ba66.93 ± 7.74Cd61.82 ± 15.28Abc232.76 ± 107.60Bb
431.30 ± 2.22AbND1.14 ± 1.43Ac2.76 ± 1.27Bb0.38 ± 0.27Ba103.99 ± 12.73Bc96.06 ± 13.14Bb294.62 ± 22.18Aab
1060.33 ± 17.29Aa47.24 ± 50.67Aa5.71 ± 2.57Ab5.72 ± 1.77Ca0.73 ± 0.38Ca222.12 ± 22.20Bb90.66 ± 14.66Bb297.73 ± 52.07Aab
1473.77 ± 14.94Ba3.68 ± 1.93Bb9.07 ± 2.23Ba6.44 ± 1.94Ba0.84 ± 0.73Ca293.99 ± 21.47Ba188.42 ± 89.63Aa321.63 ± 24.77Aa

1)Data ± standard deviation (n=6).

2)BS10: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 90:10; BS20: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 80:20; BS30: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 70:30.

3)ND: Not detected.

a-eMeans in a column of each group not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05).

A-CMeans in a column of same processing stage not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05).

Table 3.

Biogenic amine levels of bez sucuks during storage periods (mg/kg)1)

GroupStorage periods (day)Tryptamine2-Phenyl ethylaminePutrescineCadaverineHistamineTyramineSpermidineSpermine
BS102)    0122.41 ± 23.08Abc15.43 ± 12.87Abc17.83 ± 2.40Ad12.48 ± 4.72Aa5.69 ± 0.26Aa434.12 ± 83.20Ab202.70 ± 77.38Aab343.34 ± 48.83Aa
  30104.19 ± 26.31Ac0.80 ± 0.95Ac13.38 ± 3.80Ad10.95 ± 0.72Aa2.44 ± 2.10Aa417.02 ± 88.72ABb131.42 ± 47.25ABb317.42 ± 49.43Aab
  60150.18 ± 40.74Aabc18.99 ± 12.70Abc26.89 ± 4.79Abc18.79 ± 11.13Aa6.30 ± 5.68Aa554.34 ± 113.07Aab235.86 ± 71.61Aa319.35 ± 28.74Aab
  90111.59 ± 82.96Ac12.27 ± 7.72ABbc20.07 ± 12.25Acd11.71 ± 8.87Aa2.80 ± 3.47Aa425.27 ± 266.83Ab128.25 ± 113.63Ab224.35 ± 113.17Ab
120157.27 ± 47.94Aabc21.92 ± 18.95Abc31.68 ± 8.00Ab18.29 ± 13.20Aa3.58 ± 4.02Aa631.57 ± 178.73Aab223.29 ± 65.68Aa327.81 ± 38.84Aa
150184.97 ± 54.01Aab64.45 ± 19.81Aa35.63 ± 6.06Aab23.42 ± 18.29Aa3.48 ± 3.74Aa681.73 ± 163.02Aa256.16 ± 45.76Aa276.03 ± 49.99Aab
180205.11 ± 25.64Aa29.85 ± 23.27Ab43.57 ± 4.96Aa27.66 ± 24.15Aa5.53 ± 6.42Aa766.23 ± 171.00Aa297.31 ± 37.02Aa358.58 ± 120.47Aa
BS20    073.32 ± 32.05BbND3)10.34 ± 4.20Bc8.54 ± 1.56Ba2.70 ± 0.04Ba303.65 ± 82.53Bb141.79 ± 44.75Ab306.95 ± 41.37Aab
  30120.91 ± 39.02Aab11.62 ± 10.89Aabc19.00 ± 7.10Abc14.76 ± 8.94Aa3.77 ± 3.73Aa481.84 ± 123.88Aab214.63 ± 76.77Aab299.83 ± 32.77Aab
  60153.29 ± 40.08Aa4.48 ± 2.00Bc23.55 ± 3.42ABab12.02 ± 2.44ABa1.82 ± 1.88Ba498.21 ± 83.05Aab189.05 ± 34.96Aab331.18 ± 12.57Aa
  90112.71 ± 72.65Aab24.34 ± 19.93Aa23.89 ± 13.32Aab17.39 ± 15.42Aa2.65 ± 3.46Aa441.25 ± 268.81Aab138.13 ± 80.66Ab242.47 ± 97.03Ab
120123.79 ± 34.35ABab9.52 ± 9.31ABbc25.84 ± 6.84Aab13.70 ± 5.44Aa3.48 ± 4.30Aa457.19 ± 122.22ABab209.28 ± 45.81Aab299.85 ± 63.16Aab
150150.68 ± 18.57ABa16.48 ± 12.93Babc32.30 ± 4.43ABa16.13 ± 7.47Aa3.54 ± 4.38Aa551.88 ± 93.70ABa239.53 ± 44.02Aa312.29 ± 43.04Aab
180146.10 ± 54.38Ba18.20 ± 7.19Aab30.10 ± 8.17Ba17.89 ± 8.27Aa3.04 ± 3.14Aa539.60 ± 167.06Ba249.52 ± 84.71Aa246.31 ± 23.19Bb
BS30    073.77 ± 14.94Bb3.68 ± 1.93ABb9.07 ± 2.23Bc6.44 ± 1.94Bb0.84 ± 0.73Cb293.99 ± 21.47Ba188.42 ± 89.63Aab321.63 ± 24.77Aa
  3083.51 ± 30.49AabND11.50 ± 4.48Abc6.80 ± 2.15Aab0.75 ± 0.58Ab200.77 ± 64.68Ba104.88 ± 5.59Bb255.65 ± 49.90Aa
  60104.65 ± 27.79Aab0.97 ± 2.38Bb18.47 ± 5.92Babc8.14 ± 0.72Bab0.77 ± 0.48Bb374.14 ± 70.54Ba192.17 ± 70.41Aab298.49 ± 55.83Aa
  9090.72 ± 57.35AabND18.68 ± 10.92Aabc6.75 ± 3.54Aab1.39 ± 1.62Aab339.60 ± 180.84Ab121.52 ± 76.13Ab258.44 ± 110.53Aa
12099.77 ± 45.19Bab0.14 ± 0.35Bb21.12 ± 9.55Aab8.39 ± 4.60Aab1.89 ± 2.30Aab356.66 ± 150.06Ba136.16 ± 46.49Bb249.66 ± 85.30Aa
150109.46 ± 42.32Bab34.87 ± 34.01ABa24.93 ± 10.64Ba9.87 ± 5.38Aab1.57 ± 0.98Aab397.09 ± 155.19Ba234.41 ± 104.52Aa273.73 ± 85.85Aa
180132.04 ± 14.08Ba10.91 ± 4.18Ab28.81 ± 5.25Ba11.48 ± 4.16Aa9.32 ± 15.32Aa453.48 ± 62.92Ba278.66 ± 61.90Aa284.58 ± 46.43ABa

1)Data ± standard deviation (n=6).

2)BS10: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 90:10; BS20: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 80:20; BS30: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 70:30.

3)ND: Not detected.

a-eMeans in a column of each group not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05).

A-CMeans in a column of same processing stage not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05).

1)Data ± standard deviation (n=6). 2)BS10: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 90:10; BS20: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 80:20; BS30: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 70:30. 3)ND: Not detected. a-eMeans in a column of each group not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05). A-CMeans in a column of same processing stage not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05). 1)Data ± standard deviation (n=6). 2)BS10: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 90:10; BS20: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 80:20; BS30: bez sucuk having meat:fat ratio of 70:30. 3)ND: Not detected. a-eMeans in a column of each group not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05). A-CMeans in a column of same processing stage not having a common superscript letter are different (p<0.05). The cadaverine and putrescine levels of initial mixtures were in the ranges of 0.67-0.90 mg/kg and 0.22-0.50 mg/kg, respectively (Table 2). The accumulation of cadaverine and putrescine significantly increased during processing stages and reached 6.44-12.48 mg/kg and 9.06-17.83 mg/kg, respectively (p<0.05). Similar increases in putrescine and cadaverine levels in Turkish sucuks were also noted by Gençcelep et al. (2007). The presence of especially high levels of cadaverine and putrescine in BAs has been attributed to meat spoilage (Baka et al., 2011; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003). Thus, the formation of cadaverine is mainly related to the decarboxylase activity of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas (Baka et al., 2011; Latorre-Moratalla et al., 2010). The low cadaverine levels of BS groups could be explained by the contribution of good hygienic conditions when handling raw materials and the manufacturing conditions. Latorre-Moratalla et al. (2010) noted that high cadaverine levels of spontaneously fermented Portuguese chouriços were due to their high counts of Enterobacteriaceae. The cadaverine levels of BS samples showed increases during storage periods, and respectively measured 27.66, 17.89, and 11.48 mg/kg for BS10, BS20, and BS30 on day 180 (Table 3). It was seen that utilizing different meat:fat ratios did not affect the cadaverine levels of BS samples at the end of storage (p>0.05). The significant increment in putrescine levels of all BS groups was observed, especially after day 10 of the ripening stage (p<0.05). Bover-Cid et al. (1999a) also stated similar putrescine production that increased after the first week due to a pH drop. In our study, it was seen that no significant putrescine formation was observed during the first two days of the ripening stage (p>005) and, although the putrescine accumulation was significant on day 10, the pH value of the BS groups dropped dramatically after day 4 of ripening. Additionally, it was determined that BS10, with the highest meat ratio and pH value, had the highest amounts of cadaverine and putrescine on day 14 (p<0.05). The results indicated that the putrescine levels of the BS groups increased during storage and BS10, with the highest meat ratio, had the highest putrescine level (43.57 mg/kg) on day 180 (p<0.05) (Table 3). Baka et al. (2011) and Papavergou (2011) stated that putrescine was the major amine in fermented sausages. The results obtained from Turkish fermented sausages showed that utilizing only nitrite/nitrate or starter cultures limited putrescine formation (Bozkurt and Erkmen, 2007; Gençcelep et al., 2007). The histamine levels of the BS10 and BS20 groups showed significant increases during the processing stages (p<0.05) and were respectively measured as 5.59, 2.70, and 0.84 mg/kg for BS10, BS20, and BS30 (Table 2), on day 14. This could be the result of pH decreases in the first days of ripening as the pH values of all BS groups significantly decreased after the 2nd day of the ripening stages and reached the range of 4.89-5.16 (p<0.05). Many researchers also noted that an inadequate decrease of pH at the beginning of the ripening stage with extended ripening times could increase the accumulation of histamine in fermented sausages (Papavergou, 2011; Suzzi and Gardini, 2003). Bozkurt and Erkmen (2007) also stated that the ripening period had an increasing effect on the histamine levels of Turkish sucuks, but, in contrast, the researchers also noted decreases in the histamine levels after the 5th day of ripening. Furthermore, an increasing meat ratio resulted in higher histamine levels. Thus, BS10, having the highest meat ratio, had the highest histamine level (p<0.05) (Table 2); on the other hand, the histamine levels of the BS samples were under the values causing health concerns (100 mg/kg). Although the histamine levels of BS20 and BS30 showed significant decreases and increases during storage periods (p<0.05), the differences between the BS groups were not significant on day 180 (p>0.05) (Table 3). The tyramine levels of all initial mixtures were between 0.95 and 2.05 mg/kg (p>0.05). The accumulation of tyramine showed increases during the processing stages, and the tyramine levels of BS10, BS20, and BS30 were respectively measured as 434.12, 303.65, and 293.99 mg/kg (p<0.05), on day 14 (Table 2). In all the BS groups, the major tyramine formation rate occurred during the first two days due to the pH dropping. Bover-Cid et al. (2001a) also stated that gradual biogenic amine accumulation occurred from the first week of the ripening stage, coinciding with the pH decrease, especially in noninoculated fermented sausages. Similarly, Bozkurt and Erkmen (2007) determined significant increases in the tyramine levels of Turkish sucuks during the first five days of ripening and then decreases during the ripening stage. Contrary to these findings, Komprda et al. (2001) reported a substantial increment in tyramine content after the second week of ripening. Furthermore, tyramine was the main amine in all the BS groups with the exception of the naturally occurring polyamines spermine and spermidine at the end of the processing stages. Similarly, many researchers also stated that tyramine was the major amine in fermented sausages and/or sucuks (De Mey et al., 2014; Gençcelep et al., 2007; Papavergou et al., 2012). It was also determined that utilizing different meat ratios affected the tyramine levels of the BS samples. Thus, BS10, with the highest meat ratio, had the highest tyramine level on the 14th day (p<0.05) (Table 2). The tyramine levels of BS showed significant increases during the storage periods (except BS30), and the tyramine levels of BS10, BS20, and BS30 were respectively measured as 766.23, 539.60, and 453.48 mg/kg on day 180 (Table 3). The maximum allowable limit for tyramine in foods is 100-800 mg/kg (Bozkurt and Erkmen, 2002), and it was seen that the tyramine levels of all BS groups were in this range both at the end of the processing stages and storage periods. Although tryptamine was not detected in BS30 on the 2nd day of processing, the tryptamine levels of all initial mixtures increased during manufacturing and reached the range of 73.32-122.41 mg/kg at the end of the processing stages (Table 2). It was seen that BS10, having the highest meat ratio and pH on day 14, had the highest tryptamine level (p<0.05) (Table 2) and a significant increment in the tryptamine value of BS10 occurred after the 14th day of ripening, while the tryptamine levels of BS20 and BS30 increased after the 10th day of ripening (p<0.05). Tasic et al. (2012) stated that the tryptamine levels of Petrovska klobasa - a traditional fermented sausage - ranged between 14.7 and 75.1 mg/kg at the end of the drying stage. Papavergou (2011) indicated that the tryptamine levels of Greek fermented sausages were between 0 and 60.53 mg/kg. In another study, Ikonic et al. (2013) reported higher tryptamine levels (24.3-150 mg/kg) for Petrovska klobasa. The tryptamine levels of all the BS groups showed decreases and increases during storage and reached the range of 132.04-205.11 on day 180 (p<0.05) (Table 3). The highest tryptamine level was measured in BS10, having the highest meat ratio and pH value, on day 180 (p<0.05). In the initial mixtures of all groups, the 2-phenylethylamine levels were in the range of 1.13-5.10 mg/kg (p<0.05). On the 2nd day of processing, no 2-phenylethylamine was determined in any groups. Additionally, 2-phenylethylamine was not detected in BS30 on the 4th day (Table 2). Roseiro et al. (2010) and Bozkurt and Erkmen (2007) noted that 2-phenylethylamine was not detected in any ripening stages of traditional fermented sausages. In the present study, on the 14th day, the 2-phenylethylamine levels of BS10 and BS30 increased to the values of 15.43 and 3.68 mg/kg, respectively (Table 2). Similar findings were also reported by Bover-Cid et al. (2001b). Furthermore, Bover-Cid et al. (2001a) detected 2-phenylethylamine only in spontaneously fermented sausages; thus, BS is a type of spontaneously fermented sausage., the 2-phenylethylamine amounts of all BS groups varied during the storage periods, and the 2-phenylethylamine levels of BS10, BS20, and BS30 were respectively measured as 29.85, 18.20, and 10.91 mg/kg (p>0.05), on day 180 (Table 3).

Conclusions

Although the histamine levels of all the BS groups were lower than 100 mg/kg, the findings of the current study showed that increasing meat ratio resulted in higher biogenic amine levels; thus, BS10, with the highest meat ratio, had the highest amounts of tryptamine, putrescine, cadaverine, and tyramine on the 14th day (ripening) and of tryptamine, putrescine, and tyramine at the end of the storage period. The effect of the ripening period was also found to be significant in tryptamine, putrescine, cadaverine, tyramine, and spermine formation in all the BS groups. The study results indicated that the meat:fat ratio of 70:30 could be suitable for BS production to decrease the BA levels of BS.
  15 in total

1.  Effect of processing on proteolysis and biogenic amines formation in a Portuguese traditional dry-fermented ripened sausage "Chouriço Grosso de Estremoz e Borba PGI".

Authors:  L C Roseiro; A Gomes; H Gonçalves; M Sol; R Cercas; C Santos
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Effects of starter cultures and additives on the quality of Turkish style sausage (sucuk).

Authors:  Hüseyin Bozkurt; Osman Erkmen
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Effect of starter culture and storage temperature on the content of biogenic amines in dry fermented sausage poličan.

Authors:  T Komprda; J Neznalovà; S Standara; S Bover-Cid
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  The effects of a starter culture on the formation of biogenic amines in Turkish soudjoucks.

Authors:  K Ayhan; N Kolsarici; G A Ozkan
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Changes in biogenic amine and polyamine contents in slightly fermented sausages manufactured with and without sugar.

Authors:  S Bover-Cid; M Izquierdo-Pulido; M Carmen Vidal-Carou
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Effects of starter cultures and nitrite levels on formation of biogenic amines in sucuk.

Authors:  Hüseyin Gençcelep; Güzin Kaban; Mükerrem Kaya
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Effect of proteolytic starter cultures of Staphylococcus spp. on biogenic amine formation during the ripening of dry fermented sausages.

Authors:  S Bover-Cid; M Izquierdo-Pulido; M C Vidal-Carou
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  The effects of ripening period, nitrite level and heat treatment on biogenic amine formation of "sucuk" - A Turkish dry fermented sausage.

Authors:  Sükrü Kurt; Omer Zorba
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Biogenic amine formation in Nham, a Thai fermented sausage, and the reduction by commercial starter culture, Lactobacillus plantarum BCC 9546.

Authors:  Amonlaya Tosukhowong; Wonnop Visessanguan; Laphaslada Pumpuang; Preenapha Tepkasikul; Atikorn Panya; Ruud Valyasevi
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 7.514

Review 10.  Biogenic amines in dry fermented sausages: a review.

Authors:  Giovanna Suzzi; Fausto Gardini
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 5.277

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A narrative review on biogenic amines in fermented fish and meat products.

Authors:  Bhagavathi Sundaram Sivamaruthi; Periyanaina Kesika; Chaiyavat Chaiyasut
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.701

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.