Literature DB >> 29724746

A Descriptive Study of Chlorhexidine as a Disinfectant in Cleft Palate Surgery.

Gieljam Johannes Roode1, Kurt-Wilhelm Bütow2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chlorhexidine is seen as the golden standard of disinfectants. It is widely used to clean surgical sites; however, many studies indicate resistance of pathogens to chlorhexidine. One study indicated that pathogenic microorganisms were isolated from the soft palate cleft region in 57% of patients with facial clefts. The objectives of our study were to determine (1) if chlorhexidine application is effective in removing pathogens from the surgical site in these patients, and (2) if any pathogens are isolated, determine if they are resistant to other antimicrobials.
DESIGN: A descriptive observational study. SETTINGS: A private practice that specializes in facial cleft surgery, with a country-wide patient base. All procedures were executed by one oral and maxillofacial surgeon. PARTICIPANTS: All patients (N=50) who presented for primary repair of the soft palate cleft were included in the study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: written consent from parent(s), and patient cleared as systemically healthy by a pediatric physician. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: patient(s) with systemic infections (eg, flu) and/or any local infections (eg, tonsillitis). There were 25 males and 25 females with an average age of 7 months and 16 days included in the study.
METHODS: Swabs were taken from the surgical site of all 50 patients with cleft soft palate and were sent for culture, identification and antimicrobial sensitivity. The swabs were taken before disinfecting the site as well as after 2 minutes of disinfecting the surgical site with chlorhexidine. Results were compared against each other.
RESULTS: Positive cultures with 28 different pathogenic microorganisms that were identified in 47 patients before cleaning the surgical site with the chlorhexidine. The most dominant pathogens were K. pneumonia (n=22), H. influenza (n=18) and S. aureus (n=10). Of the pathogens found, 13 (46%) were still present on the swabs taken after disinfecting with chlorhexidine. K. pneumonia (n= 13), H. influenza (n=11) and S. aureus (n=9) were still the most prevalent pathogens.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 61 of the total of 113 pathogens isolated (54%), survived after 2 minutes of disinfecting the surgical and surrounding area with chlorhexidine, thus intensifying the chances of post-operative infection.
© 2018 Marshfield Clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlorhexidine; Cleft soft palate; Pathogens; Resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29724746      PMCID: PMC6108510          DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2018.1385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med Res        ISSN: 1539-4182


  29 in total

1.  In vitro effect of chlorhexidine and amikacin on oral gram-negative bacilli from bone marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  A T Brown; J A Shupe; R E Sims; J L Matheny; T T Lillich; J B Douglass; P J Henslee; T P Raybould; G A Ferretti
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1990-12

2.  Clinical epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases.

Authors:  Norman Lippmann; Christoph Lübbert; Thorsten Kaiser; Udo X Kaisers; Arne C Rodloff
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Development of resistance to chlorhexidine diacetate and cetylpyridinium chloride in Pseudomonas stutzeri and changes in antibiotic susceptibility.

Authors:  U Tattawasart; J Y Maillard; J R Furr; A D Russell
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Comparison of Decontamination Methods for Human Skin Grafts.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mann-Salinas; Denar D Joyner; Charles H Guymon; Catherine L Ward; Christopher R Rathbone; John A Jones; Kevin S Akers
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Determining the resistance of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae to common disinfectants and elucidating the underlying resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Kai Shan; Bin Xu; Jianguo Li
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  In vitro antiseptic susceptibility of clinical isolates from nosocomial infections.

Authors:  M Shimizu; K Okuzumi; A Yoneyama; T Kunisada; M Araake; H Ogawa; S Kimura
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.366

7.  Longitudinal analysis of chlorhexidine susceptibilities of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates at a teaching hospital in Taiwan.

Authors:  Jann-Tay Wang; Wang-Huei Sheng; Jiun-Ling Wang; Duckling Chen; Mei-Ling Chen; Yee-Chun Chen; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Effect of chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride on bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  A Houari; P Di Martino
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.858

9.  Frequency of biocide resistance genes, antibiotic resistance and the effect of chlorhexidine exposure on clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Leila Vali; Sarah E Davies; Lindsay L G Lai; Jayshree Dave; Sebastian G B Amyes
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use.

Authors:  Johannes Leitgeb; Rupert Schuster; Bit New Yee; Pui Fong Chee; Julian-Camill Harnoss; Peter Starzengruber; Michael Schäffer; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Sanitizing agents for virus inactivation and disinfection.

Authors:  Qianyu Lin; Jason Y C Lim; Kun Xue; Pek Yin Michelle Yew; Cally Owh; Pei Lin Chee; Xian Jun Loh
Journal:  View (Beijing)       Date:  2020-05-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.