Jianhua Wang1, Xiexiang Shao2, Mingqian Huang3, Hanlong Xin2, Zhijie Zhang4, Kunzheng Wang5. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, P.R. China; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Yangpu, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Yangpu, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Xuhui, Shanghai, China. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 157 Xiwu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, P.R. China. Electronic address: shshoulderinstitute@gmail.com.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate predictors of pain associated with computed tomographic arthrography of the shoulder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before shoulder arthrography, all participants were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Short Version Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF). The participants were nonrandomized into two groups: the anesthesia group, who underwent prior local infiltration anesthesia before shoulder arthrography, and the nonanesthesia group, who did not undergo prior local infiltration anesthesia. The pain levels at intraprocedure, at 1, 2, 6, and 12 hours, and at 1 and 2 days after injection were assessed by using a visual analog scale. Univariate and multivariate generalized linear model analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Sixty participants in the anesthesia group and 60 participants in the nonanesthesia group were included. The pain level at intraprocedure (3.37 ± 1.94 in the anesthesia group and 3.20 ± 1.34 in the nonanesthesia group) was the highest of the whole pain course. The psychological domain (P = .0013) of WHOQOL-BREF, gender (P = .042), body mass index (P = .0001), and the total number of reinsertion and redirection of needle (P< .0001) were independent predictors of arthrography-related pain. CONCLUSIONS: The pain associated with shoulder computed tomographic arthrography depends on the psychological domain of WHOQOL-BREF, gender, body mass index, and the total number of reinsertion and redirection of needle.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate predictors of pain associated with computed tomographic arthrography of the shoulder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before shoulder arthrography, all participants were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Short Version Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF). The participants were nonrandomized into two groups: the anesthesia group, who underwent prior local infiltration anesthesia before shoulder arthrography, and the nonanesthesia group, who did not undergo prior local infiltration anesthesia. The pain levels at intraprocedure, at 1, 2, 6, and 12 hours, and at 1 and 2 days after injection were assessed by using a visual analog scale. Univariate and multivariate generalized linear model analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Sixty participants in the anesthesia group and 60 participants in the nonanesthesia group were included. The pain level at intraprocedure (3.37 ± 1.94 in the anesthesia group and 3.20 ± 1.34 in the nonanesthesia group) was the highest of the whole pain course. The psychological domain (P = .0013) of WHOQOL-BREF, gender (P = .042), body mass index (P = .0001), and the total number of reinsertion and redirection of needle (P< .0001) were independent predictors of arthrography-related pain. CONCLUSIONS: The pain associated with shoulder computed tomographic arthrography depends on the psychological domain of WHOQOL-BREF, gender, body mass index, and the total number of reinsertion and redirection of needle.