Literature DB >> 29724535

Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?

Erdogan Utku Ureturk1, Aysegul Apaydin2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is a standard procedure in which miniplates and screws are used to achieve stabilization. Although the titanium plate and screw fixation system is stable, resorbable fixation systems are also used. There is currently no consensus on the ideal fixation technique for SSRO procedures and its effect on the condyle. We aimed to evaluate the stress distribution on temporomandibular joints (TMJ).
METHODS: A 3D finite element model of a hemimandible was designed and 5 mm advancement was simulated on a computer model. Four different fixation techniques were applied: inverted-L shaped bicortical screws, L-shaped bicortical screws, miniplate with monocortical screws, and miniplate with monocortical screws and bicortical screw. Computer models were prepared twice for resorbable and titanium material. Load of 600N and muscle forces were applied. In the finite element analysis, computer models simulated and analyzed stress distribution of bone, fixation materials and condyle.
RESULTS: Bicortical screws increase the total stress on TMJ, and the stress is located more on the posterior part than the anterior. Miniplates decrease the stress, and the forces are located more on the anterior aspect of the TMJ.
CONCLUSION: According to our analysis, the use of bicortical screws increases the stress amount on the condyle. For the patients with a tendency toward temporomandibular disorders, using miniplate fixation techniques may decrease the forces around the condyle. These findings should be useful for oral surgeons when deciding on the most appropriate fixation technique in patients with a tendency toward temporomandibular joint disorders.
Copyright © 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bicortical screws; Finite element analysis; Miniplates; Orthognathic surgery; Temporomandibular joint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29724535     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  5 in total

1.  Does Mandibular Advancement Orthognathic Surgery Lead to TMJ Dysfunction in Skeletal Class 2 Patients? A Quasi-Experimental Trial in an Iranian Population.

Authors:  Majid Eshghpour; Zahra Shooshtari; Ali Labafchi; Nazgol Radvar; Elahe Tohidi; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03

2.  TMJ related short-term outcomes comparing two different osteosynthesis techniques for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  T Roland-Billecart; G Raoul; M Kyheng; J J Sciote; J Ferri; R Nicot
Journal:  J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.569

3.  The effect of botulinum toxin-A injection into the masseter muscles on prevention of plate fracture and post-operative relapse in patients receiving orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Shin; Yei-Jin Kang; Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-11-25

4.  Biomechanical assessment of different fixation methods in mandibular high sagittal oblique osteotomy using a three-dimensional finite element analysis model.

Authors:  Charles Savoldelli; Elodie Ehrmann; Yannick Tillier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

Authors:  Sabit Demircan; Erdoğan Utku Uretürk; Ayşegül Apaydın; Sinan Şen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.