Literature DB >> 29724427

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Courtney Moreno1, David H Kim2, Twyla B Bartel3, Brooks D Cash4, Kevin J Chang5, Barry W Feig6, Kathryn J Fowler7, Evelyn M Garcia8, Avinash R Kambadakone9, Drew L Lambert10, Angela D Levy11, Daniele Marin12, Christine M Peterson13, Christopher D Scheirey14, Martin P Smith15, Stefanie Weinstein16, Laura R Carucci17.   

Abstract

This review summarizes the relevant literature regarding colorectal screening with imaging. For individuals at average or moderate risk for colorectal cancer, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer screening. After positive results on a fecal occult blood test or immunohistochemical test, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer detection. For individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer (eg, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, ulcerative colitis, or Crohn colitis), optical colonoscopy is preferred because of its ability to obtain biopsies to detect dysplasia. After incomplete colonoscopy, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer screening for individuals at average, moderate, or high risk. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; Barium enema; CT colonography; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer screening; MR colonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29724427     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

Review 1.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Carolyn J Crandall; Reem A Mustafa; Lauri A Hicks; Timothy J Wilt; Mary Ann Forciea; Nick Fitterman; Carrie A Horwitch; Devan Kansagara; Michael Maroto; Robert M McLean; Jairo Roa; Janice Tufte
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Overview of serum and tissue markers in colorectal cancer: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Apurva Bonde; Daniel A Smith; Elias Kikano; Jennifer M Yoest; Sree H Tirumani; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-20

3.  Preference and Experience of Colonic Examination for Participants Presenting to Hospitals with a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Result.

Authors:  Takashi Kato; Koichi Nagata; Junta Yamamichi; Soichi Tanaka; Tetsuro Honda; Norihito Shimizu; Kenichi Utano; Michiaki Hirayama; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Shoichi Horita
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  [Colorectal cancer: role of imaging in screening].

Authors:  T Mang
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  The Role of Imaging in Health Screening: Screening for Specific Conditions.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Kirsteen R Burton; Nikita Lakomkin; Shannon Kim; Prabhakar Rajiah; Midhir J Patel; Parisa Mazaheri; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Systematic review: non-endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Elsa L S A van Liere; Nanne K H de Boer; Evelien Dekker; Monique E van Leerdam; Tim G J de Meij; Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 9.524

Review 7.  Application of nanotechnology in the early diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Shenghe Deng; Junnan Gu; Zhenxing Jiang; Yinghao Cao; Fuwei Mao; Yifan Xue; Jun Wang; Kun Dai; Le Qin; Ke Liu; Ke Wu; Qianyuan He; Kailin Cai
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 9.429

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.