Literature DB >> 29724416

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Implant Evaluation.

Ana P Lourenco1, Linda Moy2, Paul Baron3, Aarati D Didwania4, Roberta M diFlorio5, Samantha L Heller6, Anna I Holbrook7, Alana A Lewin6, Tejas S Mehta8, Bethany L Niell9, Priscilla J Slanetz8, Ashley R Stuckey10, Daymen S Tuscano11, Nina S Vincoff12, Susan P Weinstein13, Mary S Newell14.   

Abstract

Breast implant imaging varies depending on patient age, implant type, and symptoms. For asymptomatic patients (any age, any implant), imaging is not recommended. Rupture of saline implants is often clinically evident, as the saline is resorbed and there is a change in breast contour. With saline implants and equivocal clinical findings, ultrasound (US) is the examination of choice for patients less than 30 years of age, either mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis or US may be used for those 30 to 39 years of age, and mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis is used for those 40 years and older. For patients with suspected silicone implant complication, MRI without contrast or US is used for those less than 30 years of age; MRI without contrast, mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis, or US may be used for those 30 to 39 years of age; and MRI without contrast or mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis is used for those 40 years and older. Patients with unexplained axillary adenopathy and silicone implants (current or prior) are evaluated with axillary US. For patients 30 years and older, mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis is performed in conjunction with US. Last, patients with suspected breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma are first evaluated with US, regardless of age or implant type. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; Breast implant; Breast implant–associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL); Implant rupture; Intracapsular and extracapsular rupture; Saline implant; Silicone implant

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29724416     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  6 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary approach to imaging for gender-affirming surgery: engaging surgeons, radiologists, and patients to ensure a positive imaging experience.

Authors:  Justin T Stowell; Vaz A Zavaletta; Evelyn F Carroll; Frances W Grimstad
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

2.  Management of Contralateral Breast and Axillary Nodes Silicone Migration after Implant Rupture.

Authors:  Leslie Elahi; Marie-Garance Meuwly; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Wassim Raffoul; Natalie Koch
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 3.  MRI features of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Anna Rotili; Federica Ferrari; Luca Nicosia; Filippo Pesapane; Valentina Tabanelli; Stefano Fiori; Anna Vanazzi; Lorenza Meneghetti; Francesca Abbate; Antuono Latronico; Enrico Cassano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 4.  Current Progress in Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Yichen Wang; Qi Zhang; Yufang Tan; Wenchang Lv; Chongru Zhao; Mingchen Xiong; Kai Hou; Min Wu; Yuping Ren; Ning Zeng; Yiping Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  [Understanding Silicone Breast Implant-Associated Complications for Radiologists].

Authors:  Jeongmin Lee; Sung Hun Kim; Jae Hee Lee; Boo Kyung Han
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-01-31

6.  The Value of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of the Integrity of Silicone Breast Implants.

Authors:  Dalia Rukanskienė; Greta Bytautaitė; Agnė Česnauskaitė; Loreta Pilipaitytė; Tautrimas Aštrauskas; Eglė Jonaitienė
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.