| Literature DB >> 29724161 |
V Palombo1, J J Loor2, M D'Andrea1, M Vailati-Riboni3, K Shahzad3, U Krogh4, P K Theil5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colostrum and milk are essential sources of antibodies and nutrients for the neonate, playing a key role in their survival and growth. Slight abnormalities in the timing of colostrogenesis/lactogenesis potentially threaten piglet survival. To further delineate the genes and transcription regulators implicated in the control of the transition from colostrogenesis to lactogenesis, we applied RNA-seq analysis of swine mammary gland tissue from late-gestation to farrowing. Three 2nd parity sows were used for mammary tissue biopsies on days 14, 10, 6 and 2 before (-) parturition and on day 1 after (+) parturition. A total of 15 mRNA libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq2500 (Illumina Inc.). The Dynamic Impact Approach and the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis were used for pathway analysis and gene network analysis, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Colostrum; Mammary gland; Sow; Transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29724161 PMCID: PMC5934875 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4719-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) validation of sequencing (Seq) results
| -14 vs −2 time comparison | -14 vs +1 time comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | FDR | FC | FC | ||
|
| |||||
| qPCR | <.0001 | 51.9 | <.0001 | 254.8 | <.0001 |
| Seq | 0.001 | 31.0 | 0.003 | 33.5 | <.0001 |
|
| |||||
| qPCR | <.0001 | 156.1 | <.0001 | 8321.9 | <.0001 |
| Seq | 0.003 | 128.5 | 0.03 | 1275.5 | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
| qPCR | <.0001 | 1.5 | 0.02 | 3.4 | <.0001 |
| Seq | 0.001 | 1.7 | 0.10 | 3.9 | <.0001 |
|
| |||||
| qPCR | 0.0001 | 2.2 | 0.0005 | 3.4 | <.0001 |
| Seq | 0.004 | 1.8 | 0.01 | 1.9 | 0.001 |
The overall false discovery rate (FDR) together with the fold-change (FC) and P-value for the specific comparison is reported for each gene. The P-values were generated applying the same statistical model to either qPCR or Seq data
Fig. 1Total number of differentially expressed genes (DEG) due to time resulting from differential expression (DE) analysis of RNAseq data of swine mammary gland tissue harvested in late-pregnancy through farrowing (FDR and p-value ≤0.05). The light blue bars indicate downregulation, while the yellow bars indicate upregulation
Top ten upregulated genes in the -2vs-14 time comparison (FDR and p-value ≤0.05)
| Gene symbol | Entrez gene ID | FDR | FC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 445,515 | ˂ .000 | 629.572 | 0.002 |
|
| 397,647 | 0.003 | 128.511 | 0.032 |
|
| 100,522,145 | 0.002 | 95.634 | 0.019 |
|
| 100,153,328 | 0.007 | 90.488 | 0.023 |
|
| 100,626,139 | 0.007 | 90.488 | 0.023 |
|
| 403,103 | 0.005 | 59.108 | 0.011 |
|
| 100,524,679 | 0.006 | 59.017 | 0.015 |
|
| 404,088 | 0.001 | 31.014 | 0.003 |
|
| 397,061 | ˂ .000 | 29.272 | 0.001 |
|
| 100,522,126 | 0.012 | 26.040 | 0.031 |
The overall false discovery rate (FDR) together with the fold-change (FC) and P-value for the specific comparison is reported for each gene
Top ten upregulated genes in the +1vs-14 time comparison (FDR and p-value ≤0.05)
| Gene symbol | Entrez gene ID | FDR | FC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 396,835 | 0.004 | 4205.803 | 0.001 |
|
| 445,515 | ˂ .000 | 3858.507 | ˂ .000 |
|
| 100,525,680 | ˂ .000 | 3039.234 | ˂ .000 |
|
| 397,647 | 0.003 | 1275.540 | 0.001 |
|
| 100,522,145 | 0.002 | 568.374 | ˂ .000 |
|
| 397,303 | ˂ .000 | 372.186 | ˂ .000 |
|
| 406,870 | 0.043 | 258.471 | 0.011 |
|
| 397,061 | ˂ .000 | 204.864 | ˂ .000 |
|
| 100,153,328 | 0.007 | 202.517 | 0.002 |
|
| 100,626,139 | 0.007 | 202.517 | 0.002 |
The overall false discovery rate (FDR) together with the fold-change (FC) and P-value for the specific comparison is reported for each gene
Summary of top 10 upregulated genes in both and specific time comparisons (FDR and p-value ≤0.05)
| Status | +1vs-14 time comparison | -2vs-14 time comparison | both time comparisons |
|---|---|---|---|
| upregulated |
|
|
|
Fig. 2Summary of the main KEGG categories resulting from the Dynamic Impact Approach (DIA) analysis on differentially expressed genes (DEG) obtained by differential expression (DE) analysis of RNAseq data of swine mammary gland tissue harvested in late-pregnancy through farrowing (FDR and p-value ≤0.05). For each time comparison, the columns represent the effect (impact) and flux responses. The white bars represent the effect value (0 to 150), and the flux columns represent negative (−) and positive (+) flux (− 150 to + 150) based on the direction of the effect. The negative flux (light blue bars) indicates a downregulation, while the positive flux (yellow bars) indicates an upregulation
Fig. 3Summary of KEGG ‘Lipid Metabolism’ pathways resulting from the Dynamic Impact Approach (DIA) analysis on differentially expressed genes (DEG) obtained by differential expression (DE) analysis of RNAseq data on swine mammary gland from late pregnancy to farrowing (FDR and p-value ≤0.05). For each time comparison, the columns represent the effect (impact) and flux responses. The white bars represent the effect value (0 to 300), and the flux columns represent negative (−) and positive (+) flux (− 300 to + 300) based on the direction of the effect. The negative flux (light blue bars) indicates a downregulation, while the positive flux (yellow bars) indicates an upregulation
Fig. 4Summary of KEGG ‘Endocrine system’ pathways resulting from the Dynamic Impact Approach (DIA) analysis on differentially expressed genes (DEG) obtained by differential expression (DE) analysis of RNAseq data of swine mammary gland tissue harvested in late-pregnancy through farrowing (FDR and p-value ≤0.05). For each time comparison, the columns represent the effect (impact) and flux responses. The white bars represent the effect value (0 to 200), and the flux columns represent negative (−) and positive (+) flux (−200 to + 200) based on the direction of the effect. The negative flux (light blue bars) indicates a downregulation, while the positive flux (yellow bars) indicates an upregulation
Fig. 5Top 10 upregulated KEGG pathways in the -2d vs −14 d comparison resulting from the Dynamic Impact Approach (DIA) analysis on differentially expressed genes (DEG) obtained by differential expression (DE) analysis of RNAseq data of swine mammary gland tissue harvested in late-pregnancy through farrowing (FDR and p-value ≤0.05). The columns represent the effect (impact) and flux responses. The white bars represent the effect value (0 to 150) and the yellow bars represent the flux (the direction of the effect)
Fig. 6Top 10 upregulated KEGG pathways in the + 1d vs − 14 d comparison resulting from the Dynamic Impact Approach (DIA) analysis on differentially expressed genes (DEG) obtained by differential expression (DE) analysis of RNAseq data of swine mammary gland tissue harvested in late-pregnancy through farrowing (FDR and p-value ≤0.05). The columns represent the effect (impact) and flux responses. The white bars represent the effect value (0 to 400) and the yellow bars represent the flux (the direction of the effect)
Summary of upregulated genes in the most-recurrent KEGG subcategories in both and specific comparisons (FDR and p-value ≤0.05)
| KEGG Category | Status | +1vs-14 time comparison | -2vs-14 time comparison | Both time comparisons |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid Metabolism | upregulated |
|
|
|
| Endocrine System | upregulated |
|
|
|
Summary of the most-activated Transcription Regulators (TR) in both and specific comparisons (p-value ≤0.01; z-score ≥ ± 2)
| Status | +1vs-14 time comparison | -2vs-14 time comparison | Both time comparisons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activated |
|
|
|