Literature DB >> 29723790

What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: A systematic review with meta-synthesis.

Noelyn Perriman1, Deborah Lee Davis2, Sally Ferguson3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are a number of qualitative studies indicating women are more satisfied with a continuity model of midwifery care however, their experiences have not been understood to gain an overall picture of what it is they value, appreciate and want in such a model. A metasynthesis was undertaken in order to examine the current qualitative literature to gain a deeper understanding of the woman's perspective as a consumer of maternity care in a continuity model. AIM: To identify and synthesise research findings presenting childbearing women's perspectives on continuity of midwifery care.
METHODS: A search using key words was undertaken using the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Medline, Nursing Reference Centre and Joanna Briggs Institute. Papers were included if they were published since 2006, in English and included qualitative data from the woman's perspective. The selection process followed was the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Quality appraisal was conducted by all authors using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool as a screening tool. This allowed for each paper to be appraised to determine risk of bias.
FINDINGS: Thirteen quality appraised papers published between 2006 and 2016 were found which included qualitative data and were related to the woman's experience in a continuity model. Six papers were from Australia, three in the United Kingdom, two in New Zealand and one in the United States of America and Denmark. Themes identified included an overarching concept of the relationship which was underpinned by themes of personalised care, trust and empowerment.
CONCLUSIONS: The midwife-woman relationship is the vehicle through which personalised care, trust and empowerment are achieved in the continuity of midwifery model of care. Crown
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case-load; Consumer; Continuity of care; Midwifery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29723790     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  14 in total

1.  Experiences and needs of women in vulnerable situations receiving additional interventions in maternity care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Esther I Feijen-de Jong; Maria Dalmaijer; Relinde A van der Stouwe; Danielle E M C Jansen; J Catja Warmelink
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  A randomized clinical trial of a new perioperative practice model on anxiety and health-related quality of life in arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Maria Pulkkinen; Irma Jousela; Harri Sintonen; Janne Engblom; Sanna Salanterä; Kristiina Junttila
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-02-12

3.  Birth during the Covid-19 pandemic: What childbearing people in the United States needed to achieve a positive birth experience.

Authors:  Joan L Combellick; Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Tamika Julien; Kirsten Scharer; Kierra Jackson; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.081

4.  The impact of COVID-19 on pregnant womens' experiences and perceptions of antenatal maternity care, social support, and stress-reduction strategies.

Authors:  Sarah Meaney; Sara Leitao; Ellinor K Olander; Johanna Pope; Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.349

Review 5.  Factors influencing healthcare professionals' confidence in vaccination in Europe: a literature review.

Authors:  D Pavlovic; P Sahoo; H J Larson; E Karafillakis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.526

6.  Women's experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Lilian Peters; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Warren Keedle; Hannah Grace Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Women's perception of continuity of team midwifery care in Iran: a qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Sholeh Shahinfar; Parvin Abedi; Mahin Najafian; Zahra Abbaspoor; Eesa Mohammadi; Narges Alianmoghaddam
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Developing a midwifery service task list for Chinese midwives in the task-shifting context: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Yan Ding; Xu Qian; Chunyi Gu; Helena Lindgren; Xiaojiao Wang; Zheng Zhang; Shuang Liang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Partners' expectations and experiences of the project 'Midwife All the Way': A qualitative study.

Authors:  Birgitta Larsson; Li Thies-Lagergren
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-06-16

10.  Women's characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Pien Offerhaus; Suze Jans; Chantal Hukkelhoven; Raymond de Vries; Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.