Literature DB >> 29723006

Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.

Nick Berggren1, Martin Eimer1.   

Abstract

During visual search, attention is believed to be controlled in a strictly feature-based fashion, without any guidance by object-based target representations. To challenge this received view, we measured electrophysiological markers of attentional selection (N2pc component) and working memory (sustained posterior contralateral negativity; SPCN) in search tasks where two possible targets were defined by feature conjunctions (e.g., blue circles and green squares). Critically, some search displays also contained nontargets with two target features (incorrect conjunction objects, e.g., blue squares). Because feature-based guidance cannot distinguish these objects from targets, any selective bias for targets will reflect object-based attentional control. In Experiment 1, where search displays always contained only one object with target-matching features, targets and incorrect conjunction objects elicited identical N2pc and SPCN components, demonstrating that attentional guidance was entirely feature-based. In Experiment 2, where targets and incorrect conjunction objects could appear in the same display, clear evidence for object-based attentional control was found. The target N2pc became larger than the N2pc to incorrect conjunction objects from 250 ms poststimulus, and only targets elicited SPCN components. This demonstrates that after an initial feature-based guidance phase, object-based templates are activated when they are required to distinguish target and nontarget objects. These templates modulate visual processing and control access to working memory, and their activation may coincide with the start of feature integration processes. Results also suggest that while multiple feature templates can be activated concurrently, only a single object-based target template can guide attention at any given time. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29723006     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search.

Authors:  Nick Berggren; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-27

3.  Working memory guidance of visual attention to threat in offenders.

Authors:  Tamara S Satmarean; Elizabeth Milne; Richard Rowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Impaired disengagement of attention from computer-related stimuli in Internet Gaming Disorder: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Manuel Mennig; Anna Schubö; Antonia Barke
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 6.756

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.