Literature DB >> 29722728

An Optimal Orthotopic Mouse Model for Human Colorectal Cancer Primary Tumor Growth and Spontaneous Metastasis.

Nathan Hite1, Aaron Klinger2, Linh Hellmers3, Grace A Maresh3, Peter E Miller4, Xin Zhang3, Li Li3,5, David A Margolin2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Small animal models allow for the study of different metastatic patterns, but an optimal model for metastatic colorectal cancer has not been established.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine which orthotopic model most accurately emulates the patterns of primary tumor growth and spontaneous liver and lung metastases seen in patients with colorectal cancer.
DESIGN: Using luciferase-tagged HT-29 cells coinoculated with lymph node stromal analog HK cells, 3 tumor cell delivery models were compared: intrarectal injection, intracecal injection, and acid enema followed by cancer cell instillation. Tumor growth was monitored weekly by bioluminescent imaging, and mice were sacrificed based on primary tumor size or signs of systemic decline. Liver and lungs were evaluated for metastases via bioluminescent imaging and histology. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single university center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary tumor and metastasis bioluminescent imaging were measured.
RESULTS: Intrarectal injection had the lowest mortality at 4.0% (1/25) compared with the intracecal group at 17.4% (4/23) and the acid enema followed by cancer cell instillation group at 15.0% (3/20).The primary tumors in intrarectal mice had the highest average bioluminescence (3.78 × 10 ± 4.94 × 10 photons) compared with the mice in the intracecal (9.52 × 10 ± 1.92 × 10 photons; p = 0.012) and acid enema followed by cancer cell instillation groups (6.23 × 10 ± 1.23 × 10 photons; p = 0.0016). A total of 100% of intrarectal and intracecal mice but only 35% of mice in the acid enema followed by cancer cell instillation group had positive bioluminescent imaging before necropsy. Sixty percent of intrarectal mice had liver metastases, and 56% had lung metastases. In the intracecal group, 39% of mice had liver metastases, and 35% had lung metastases. Only 2 acid enema followed by cancer cell instillation mice developed metastases. LIMITATIONS: Tumor injections were performed by multiple investigators. Distant metastases were confirmed, but local lymph node status was not evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrarectal injection is the safest, most reproducible, and successful orthotopic mouse model for human colorectal cancer primary tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29722728     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  11 in total

1.  Illuminating human disease: The potential of in vivo imaging for preclinical research and diagnostics.

Authors:  Philip Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Comparison of Different Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases Models Using Six Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Yuting Xu; Lin Zhang; Qingling Wang; Maojin Zheng
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Sulindac Modulates the Response of Proficient MMR Colorectal Cancer to Anti-PD-L1 Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Bin Yi; Hao Cheng; Dorota Wyczechowska; Qingzhao Yu; Li Li; Augusto C Ochoa; Adam I Riker; Yaguang Xi
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 4.  Biochemical Markers of Colorectal Cancer - Present and Future.

Authors:  Wojciech Jelski; Barbara Mroczko
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 5.  The role of mouse models in colorectal cancer research-The need and the importance of the orthotopic models.

Authors:  Rui C Oliveira; Ana Margarida Abrantes; José Guilherme Tralhão; Maria Filomena Botelho
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2020-03-11

Review 6.  Mouse models of colorectal cancer: Past, present and future perspectives.

Authors:  Florian Bürtin; Christina S Mullins; Michael Linnebacher
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Two sides to colon cancer: mice mimic human anatomical region disparity in colon cancer development and progression.

Authors:  Jessica Felton; Kunrong Cheng; Aaron C Shang; Shien Hu; Shannon M Larabee; Cinthia B Drachenberg; Jean-Pierre Raufman
Journal:  J Cancer Metastasis Treat       Date:  2018-09-27

8.  An In Vivo Mouse Model of Pelvic Recurrence of Human Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Yamamoto; Kohei Taniguchi; Shinsuke Masubuchi; Tomo Tominaga; Yosuke Inomata; Akiko Miyamoto; Taka-Aki Ishizuka; Takashi Murakami; Wataru Osumi; Hiroki Hamamoto; Keitaro Tanaka; Junji Okuda; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Longitudinal micro-endoscopic monitoring of high-success intramucosal xenografts for mouse models of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Bjorn Paulson; Ick Hee Kim; Jung-Man Namgoong; Young Gyu Kim; Sanghwa Lee; Youngjin Moon; Dong-Myung Shin; Myung-Soo Choo; Jun Ki Kim
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Reprogramming immunosuppressive myeloid cells facilitates immunotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Weiqiang Lu; Weiwei Yu; Jiacheng He; Wenjuan Liu; Junjie Yang; Xianhua Lin; Yuanjin Zhang; Xin Wang; Wenhao Jiang; Jian Luo; Qiansen Zhang; Huaiyu Yang; Shihong Peng; Zhengfang Yi; Shancheng Ren; Jing Chen; Stefan Siwko; Ruth Nussinov; Feixiong Cheng; Hankun Zhang; Mingyao Liu
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 14.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.