Literature DB >> 29722473

Weight Stigma Affects Men Too.

Rebecca L Pearl1,2, Thomas A Wadden1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29722473      PMCID: PMC5970060          DOI: 10.1002/oby.22205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


× No keyword cloud information.
Weight stigma, like eating disorders (1), tends to be overlooked and understudied in men. This practice is likely to change with the publication of Himmelstein, Puhl, and Quinn’s (2) important finding that approximately 40% or more of men, across three samples, reported having experienced weight-based stigmatization. This finding challenges the notion that men are not affected by weight stigma and rightfully highlights the need to include them more fully in research on this problem. Himmelstein and colleagues’(2) report addresses several gaps in the weight stigma literature and begins to develop a phenotype for men who report maltreatment due to their weight. Men were more likely to report weight-stigmatizing experiences if they were younger, unmarried, of lower income and higher education, and engaged in dieting behavior. They also had a body mass index (BMI) that fell in either the underweight or obesity range. This “U-shaped” pattern of weight stigma at the lowest and highest BMIs represents a key difference between men and women. Stigmatization of underweight men may contribute to reports of both greater body image dissatisfaction and symptoms of depression in this group, compared with men of average weight (3,4). As with eating disorders (1), male-specific experiences of weight stigmatization should be incorporated in future research surveys and in clinical assessments, so that weight stigma is not overlooked in men. The phenotype can be further developed by examining the influence of race/ethnicity in more depth and by including additional factors such as sexual orientation. Himmelstein et al.’s (2) examination of the nature and timing of weight-stigmatizing experiences represents another empirical step forward. Currently, little is known about whether there are critical periods in which men (and women) are particularly vulnerable to weight stigma, or how the type or source of stigma shapes its potentially adverse effects. For example, does being teased by a peer in adolescence potentially have different effects on psychological or physical health later in life than, say, being denied a job as an adult due to one’s weight? Age of onset of obesity should also be considered in future research. Adults who have persistently faced weight stigma since early childhood may carry a greater burden of stigma’s ill effects than individuals who developed obesity later in life. A crucial next step for weight stigma research is to determine whether, in response to weight-stigmatizing experiences, men and women report comparable levels of distress and weight bias internalization (WBI). Women who strongly endorse having experienced weight stigma also report greater internalization of negative weight stereotypes and self-devaluation due to weight (5). Examination of how weight-stigmatizing experiences contribute to WBI among men is needed as well. In addition, some prior research has shown gender differences in the relationship between WBI and health outcomes, such as depression and eating pathology (6). More information about the degree and nature of distress caused by weight stigma in men will illuminate the circumstances in which clinical intervention is needed. Investigations of emerging psychological interventions for WBI, which have studied mostly female samples (7,8), should increase efforts to include men. Overall, more detailed analyses of weight-stigmatizing experiences and their effects among diverse groups of men and women – as well as transgender and non-binary people – will help to hone our understanding of the wide reach and adverse consequences of weight stigma.
  7 in total

Review 1.  The enigma of male eating disorders: A critical review and synthesis.

Authors:  Stuart B Murray; Jason M Nagata; Scott Griffiths; Jerel P Calzo; Tiffany A Brown; Deborah Mitchison; Aaron J Blashill; Jonathan M Mond
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-08-02

2.  Differential effects of weight bias experiences and internalization on exercise among women with overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Rebecca L Pearl; Rebecca M Puhl; John F Dovidio
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2014-02-06

3.  Weight Stigma in Men: What, When, and by Whom?

Authors:  Mary S Himmelstein; Rebecca M Puhl; Diane M Quinn
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Relationships between obesity and DSM-IV major depressive disorder, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts: results from a general population study.

Authors:  K M Carpenter; D S Hasin; D B Allison; M S Faith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Group cognitive-behavioral treatment for internalized weight stigma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Pearl; Christina H Hopkins; Robert I Berkowitz; Thomas A Wadden
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 6.  Body image dissatisfaction among males across the lifespan: a review of past literature.

Authors:  Marita P McCabe; Lina A Ricciardelli
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Gender differences in weight bias internalisation and eating pathology in overweight individuals.

Authors:  Rebecca G Boswell; Marney A White
Journal:  Adv Eat Disord       Date:  2015-08-25
  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A review of the psychosocial aspects of clinically severe obesity and bariatric surgery.

Authors:  David B Sarwer; Leslie J Heinberg
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020 Feb-Mar

2.  Prospective Evaluation of Internalized Weight Bias and Weight Change Among Successful Weight-Loss Maintainers.

Authors:  KayLoni L Olson; Jason Lillis; J Graham Thomas; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.002

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.