Literature DB >> 29722082

The reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Score in a sleep clinic population.

Elisabeth Taylor1, Irene Zeng2, Conor O'Dochartaigh1.   

Abstract

Despite the Epworth Sleepiness Score being widely used, there are limited studies of its reliability in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Score in a clinical population. The study included patients referred to Middlemore Hospital sleep service between October and November 2014, aged over 17 years, with at least two Epworth Sleepiness Score measurements at up to three different points on the diagnostic pathway: on General Practitioner referral (GP Epworth Sleepiness Score); at overnight oximetry assessment (Oximetry Epworth Sleepiness Score); and at a specialist clinic (Specialist Epworth Sleepiness Score). No treatment was administered between scores. One-hundred and thirty-three patients were included in the study. There was a median of 91 days from GP Epworth Sleepiness Score to Oximetry Epworth Sleepiness Score, and 11 days from Oximetry Epworth Sleepiness Score to Specialist Epworth Sleepiness Score. There was poor test-retest reliability between GP Epworth Sleepiness Score and Specialist Epworth Sleepiness Score; 72.4% and 17.8% of patients had an absolute difference of more than 2 and 8 Epworth Sleepiness Score points, respectively. A Bland-Altman plot of mean Epworth Sleepiness Score versus the difference between GP Epworth Sleepiness Score and Specialist Epworth Sleepiness Score demonstrated a wide scatter of data and 95% confidence interval for the difference in Epworth Sleepiness Score for an individual patient of -14 to +10. There was similar variability between GP Epworth Sleepiness Score and Oximetry Epworth Sleepiness Score. The reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Score is unproven in clinical settings. This study shows poor test-retest reliability of Epworth Sleepiness Score, particularly between primary and secondary care, arguing against the use of Epworth Sleepiness Score for clinical decision-making or prioritisation of services without first assessing the reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Score in the relevant clinical population.
© 2018 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  somnolence scores; test-retest reliability scores

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29722082     DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  5 in total

1.  Scoring of Hypersomnolence and Fatigue in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treated With a Titratable Custom-Made Mandibular Advancement Device.

Authors:  Elahe Kazemeini; Marc J Braem; Greta Moorkens; Sowjanya Balina; Chloé Kastoer; Sara Op de Beeck; Olivier M Vanderveken; Marijke Dieltjens
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Clinical Efficacy of Sanfeng Tongqiao Diwan in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Jiaying Luo; Zhangkai Cheng; Gui Chen; Zhiman Liang; Baoqing Sun; Feng Wang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Defining obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: a failure of semantic rules.

Authors:  Renata L Riha
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2021-09

4.  Test-retest reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in clinical trial settings.

Authors:  Russell Rosenberg; Kimberly Babson; Diane Menno; Susan Morris; Michelle Baladi; Danielle Hyman; Jed Black
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.296

5.  Short-Term Continuous Positive Air Pressure Treatment: Effects on Quality of Life and Sleep in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Laima Kondratavičienė; Kęstutis Malakauskas; Guoda Vaitukaitienė; Tomas Balsevičius; Marius Žemaitis; Skaidrius Miliauskas
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.