Literature DB >> 2972167

Placebo-controlled comparison of danazol and high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of endometriosis.

S Telimaa1, J Puolakka, L Rönnberg, A Kauppila.   

Abstract

A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerance of danazol and high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in the treatment of mild-moderate endometriosis. After laparoscopical confirmation of endometriosis, 59 patients were randomized to receive danazol (200 mg 3 times daily), MPA (100 mg daily) or placebo for 6 months. Clinical examinations were done before and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the beginning of the study, and a 2nd laparoscopy 6 months after termination of the medication. Eighteen patients in the danazol group, 16 in the MPA group and 17 in the placebo group completed the trial. Total or partial resolution of peritoneal implants was observed in 60% of the patients receiving danazol and in 63% of the patients receiving MPA. In the placebo group, resolution was observed in 18%, while the size of the implants was estimated to be increased in 23% of the patients. In relation to placebo, danazol and MPA significantly alleviated endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, lower back pain and defecation pain, but they did not differ from each other in these actions. The appearance of acne, muscle cramps, edema, weight gain and spotting bleeding complicated MPA treatment. The present results indicate that because of good efficacy and tolerance, high-dose MPA is a useful alternative in the hormonal treatment of endometriosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2972167     DOI: 10.3109/09513598709082692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  15 in total

Review 1.  Endometriosis: aetiology, pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  T J Child; S L Tan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Efficacy of Norethisterone in Patients with Ovarian Endometrioma.

Authors:  Fuminori Taniguchi; Akiko Enatsu; Ai Ikebuchi; Emiko Yamane; Maako Moriyama; Jiro Murakami; Takashi Harada; Tasuku Harada
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 3.  Pharmacological Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women.

Authors:  Erin T Carey; Sara R Till; Sawsan As-Sanie
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The Dual Estrogen Receptor α Inhibitory Effects of the Tissue-Selective Estrogen Complex for Endometrial and Breast Safety.

Authors:  Sang Jun Han; Khurshida Begum; Charles E Foulds; Ross A Hamilton; Suzanna Bailey; Anna Malovannaya; Doug Chan; Jun Qin; Bert W O'Malley
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 5.  Current and Emerging Therapeutics for the Management of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Simone Ferrero; Fabio Barra; Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Endometriosis for the colorectal surgeon.

Authors:  Katrina Slaughter; Rajiv B Gala
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-06

Review 7.  Progestagens and anti-progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Sari Kives; Muhammad Akhtar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

8.  Optimal management of chronic cyclical pelvic pain: an evidence-based and pragmatic approach.

Authors:  Ha Ryun Won; Jason Abbott
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-20

Review 9.  Endometriosis: current therapies and new pharmacological developments.

Authors:  Paolo Vercellini; Edgardo Somigliana; Paola Viganò; Annalisa Abbiati; Giussy Barbara; Pier Giorgio Crosignani
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  A risk benefit assessment of drugs used in the treatment of endometriosis.

Authors:  R W Shaw
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.