| Literature DB >> 29721140 |
Hasnae Benkirane1, Youness Taboz1, Nada Benajiba2, Yasmine Guennoun1, Abderrazzak Khadmaoui3, Amina Bouziani1, Habiba Bajit1, Khalid El Kari1, Nawal Bentahila1,4, Amina Barkat4,5, Hassan Aguenaou1,4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Morocco has recently developed a plan of reducing sugar consumption to reinforce prevention of non-communicable diseases and to contribute to the achievement of global voluntary targets for non-communicable diseases set by ICN2 by 2025. The objective of the present study was to assess acceptance of yogurts with different percentage reduction of sugar by the Moroccan population.Entities:
Keywords: Morocco; Sugar reduction; acceptance; yoghurt
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29721140 PMCID: PMC5927571 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.310.12257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Participants distribution according to their overall liking score of yogurt with varying sucrose concentration (n = 201)
|
| 0 | 83.2 | 99 | 116.5 | 133.2 | 149.8 | 166.5 |
|
| I dislike | 69.6 | 41.3 | 26.4 | 13.4 | 11.4 | 16.4 | 18.9 | < 0.000 |
| I neither like nor dislike | 14.4 | 14.9 | 20.9 | 12.4 | 7.9 | 9.4 | 8.4 | |
| I like | 15.9 | 43.8 | 52.7 | 74.1 | 80.6 | 74.1 | 72.6 | |
Results are presented in percentage of total population by each concentration of added sugar
p-value was calculated using Freidman’s Chi2 test = 366.114, test significance was set at a p-value < 0.05
Figure 1Participants distribution according to quartiles of their overall liking score of yogurt with varying sucrose concentration (n = 201) (Q1 = Quartile 1 and Q3 = Quartile 3)
Participants distribution according to their JAR score of yogurt with varying sucrose concentration (n = 201)
|
| 0 | 83.2 | 99 | 116.5 | 133.2 | 149.8 | 166.5 | p-value |
| A little sweet | 96.5 | 79.6 | 60.2 | 33.8 | 17.9 | 11.4 | 4.9 | < 0.000 |
| Just about right | 3.5 | 18.9 | 28.4 | 44.3 | 42.8 | 28.8 | 22.4 | |
| Too sweet | 0 | 1.5 | 11.4 | 21.9 | 39.3 | 59.7 | 72.6 | |
Results are presented in percentage of total population by each concentration of added sugar.
p-value was calculated using Freidman’s Chi2 test = 779.64, test significance was set at a p-value < 0.05
Figure 2Participants distribution according to quartiles of JAR score of yogurt with varying sucrose concentration (n = 201) (Q1 = Quartile 1 and Q3 = Quartile 3)
Participants distribution according to their purchase intent scoring of yogurt with varying sucrose concentration (n = 201)
| p-value | ||||||||
| Purchase intent scale | 0 | 83.2 | 99 | 116.5 | 133.2 | 149.8 | 166.5 | |
| 1.I would definitely not buy | 59.2 | 30.3 | 21.4 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 19.9 | P < 0.000 |
| 2. I would probably not buy | 4.9 | 7.4 | 10.9 | 7.5 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 5.5 | |
| 3. I don’t know | 5.5 | 15.4 | 21.4 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 6.5 | 9.4 | |
| 4. I would probably buy | 10.9 | 20.9 | 24.4 | 40.3 | 35.8 | 40.3 | 28.4 | |
| 5. I would definitely buy | 9.4 | 15.9 | 21.9 | 9.9 | 35.8 | 34.8 | 36.8 | |
Results are presented in percentage of total population by each concentration of added sugar.
p-value was calculated using Freidman’s Chi2 test = 263.07, test significance was set at a p-value < 0.05