| Literature DB >> 29721103 |
Kristin M Junge1, Beate Leppert1, Saskia Trump1, Roland Eils2,3,4, Tobias Polte1,5, Irina Lehmann1,6, Susanne Jahreis1,5, Dirk K Wissenbach7,8, Ralph Feltens7, Konrad Grützmann1,9,10,11, Loreen Thürmann1,3, Tobias Bauer12, Naveed Ishaque12,13, Matthias Schick14, Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler11, Stefan Röder1, Mario Bauer1, Angela Schulz15, Michael Borte16, Kathrin Landgraf17,18, Antje Körner17,18, Wieland Kiess17,18, Martin von Bergen7,19, Gabriele I Stangl13,20.
Abstract
Background: Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals can alter normal physiology and increase susceptibility to non-communicable diseases like obesity. Especially the prenatal and early postnatal period is highly vulnerable to adverse effects by environmental exposure, promoting developmental reprogramming by epigenetic alterations. To obtain a deeper insight into the role of prenatal bisphenol A (BPA) exposure in children's overweight development, we combine epidemiological data with experimental models and BPA-dependent DNA methylation changes.Entities:
Keywords: Adipogenesis; DNA methylation; EDC; Epigenetics; Infants; LINA; Mesenchymal stem cells; Mice; Obesity; Prenatal exposure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29721103 PMCID: PMC5910578 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-018-0478-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Fig. 1Epigenome wide analysis and MEST methylation assessment. Manhattan-Plot from 450 K array comparing children prenatally exposed to high vs. low BPA. Shown are significant CpGs observed in cord blood that passed threshold for Bonferroni correction (red threshold line, p < 2.37E-7)
General study population characteristics
| Entire LINA cohort | Analyzed sub-cohort |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender of the child | 0.966 | ||
| Female | 302(48.0) | 197(48.3) | |
| Male | 327(52.0) | 211(51.7) | |
| Birth weight | 0.941 | ||
| ≤ 3000 g | 123(19.6) | 68(16.7) | |
| > 3000–3500 g | 242(38.5) | 157(38.5) | |
| > 3500–4000 g | 192(30.6) | 129(31.6) | |
| > 4000 g | 71(11.3) | 54(13.2) | |
| Gestational week at delivery | 0.834 | ||
| < 37 weeks | 25(4.0) | 10(2.5) | |
| 37–40 weeks | 389(62.0) | 255(62.5) | |
| > 40 weeks | 214(34.0) | 143(35.0) | |
| Smoking during pregnancy | 0.833 | ||
| Never | 534(84.9) | 358(87.7) | |
| Occasionally | 47(7.4) | 23(5.6) | |
| Daily | 48(7.6) | 27(6.6) | |
| Parental school education | 0.969 | ||
| Low | 16(2.5) | 8(2.0) | |
| Intermediate | 144(22.9) | 96(23.5) | |
| High | 469(74.6) | 304(74.5) | |
| Household members | 0.932 | ||
| 2 | 33(5.2) | 20(4.9) | |
| 3 | 365(58.0) | 257(63.0) | |
| > 4 | 203(32.3) | 129(31.6) | |
| Breastfeeding exclusive | 0.968 | ||
| 1–3 months | 112(17.8) | 69(16.9) | |
| 1–6 months | 190(30.2) | 121(29.7) | |
| 1–12 months | 254(40.4) | 172(42.2) | |
| Introduction to solid food | 0.897 | ||
| 1–3 months | 23(3.7) | 11(2.7) | |
| 4–6 months | 251(39.9) | 156(38.2) | |
| 7–12 months | 305(48.5) | 205(50.2) | |
| Urinary BPA concentration during pregnancy | 0.263d | ||
| Median [ng/mg creatinine] | 12.7 | 12.7 | |
| IQRe [ng/mg creatinine] | 7.5–16.0 | 7.6–15.9 | |
| BMI | |||
| Median | − 0.24 | − 0.16 | |
| IQR | − 0.90–0.35 | − 0.79-0.43 | |
| BMI | |||
| Median | − 0.02 | 0.05 | |
| IQR | − 0.67-0.50 | − 0.51-0.54 | |
an may be different from 629 due to missing data
bCalculated using the chi-squared test for cross relationship
cLow = 8 years of schooling (‘Hauptschulabschluss`); intermediate = 10 years of schooling (`Mittlere Reife`); high = 12 years of schooling or more (`(Fach-)hochschulreife’)
dp-value derived by Student’s t test between group means
eIQR: inter quartile range (25th to 75th percentile)
Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) comparing children prenatally exposed to high vs. low BPA. Shown are significant CpGs observed in cord blood that passed Bonferroni correction
| CpG | Chromosome | Position | Region | Host gene | Δ βb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cg17580798 | 7 | 130,132,199 | Promoter |
| 1.35E-07 | −1.8% |
| cg23117250 | 17 | 80,649,886 | Intron |
| 1.55E-07 | −2.0% |
ap values are derived from a regression model with prenatal vitamin D level, prenatal benzene exposure, maternal smoking, maternal stress, and cord blood cell composition as confounding parameters
bMethylation differences are shown as Δ methylation values (β)
Fig. 2Association of BPA with MEST promoter methylation and MEST expression in cord blood a MEST promoter methylation (=mean of MassARRAY amplicon) in cord blood of low (< 25%; lower quartile (LQ), n = 102) and high (> 75%, upper quartile (UQ), n = 101) BPA-exposed children. p value from MWU-test. b MEST promoter methylation and expression in cord blood are correlated in children with high prenatal exposure to BPA (UQ, n = 94), while MEST expression is not correlated with MEST promoter methylation in lowly exposed children (remaining 75%, n = 267). R and p values from Spearman correlation. c Mediator model for the association of prenatal BPA exposure, cord blood MEST promoter methylation and expression. Models were adjusted for gender of the child, smoking during pregnancy, parental school education, solid food introduction, week of gestation at delivery, number of household members, and early delivery. Shown are effect sizes with *p < 0.05
Fig. 3Mediator models a for the association of prenatal BPA exposure with MEST promoter methylation and children’s BMI z scores at year 1, b for the association of cord blood MEST methylation with children’s BMI z score at years 1 and 6. Models were adjusted for gender of the child, smoking during pregnancy, parental school education, solid food introduction, week of gestation at delivery, number of household members, and early delivery. Shown are effect sizes with *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001
Fig. 4BPA effects in a murine in vivo model. a Impact of prenatal BPA exposure on weight development in the offspring. Shown are means and standard deviations from n ≥ 8/group and p values are derived from ANOVA. b Differentiation of offspring weight at 10 weeks in lean and fat mass. c Targeted MassARRAY Mest methylation analysis in fat tissue of 10-week-old offspring after prenatal BPA exposure compared to controls. d Mest expression analysis in visceral fat tissue of 10-week-old offspring after prenatal BPA exposure compared to controls. For b, c, and d data of n ≥ 4, mice is presented with *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001
Fig. 5In vitro adipocyte differentiation from human MSCs: exposure to BPA (10 μM, 50 μM) compared to solvent control (EtOH 0.05%). a Real-time monitoring of cell differentiation (xCELLigence: normalized cell index) over a 17-day period (mean ± SD, n = 4). b Quantification of Oil Red O stained area (mean ± SD, n ≥ 20 from one experiment). c Exemplary histological Oil Red O staining of adipocytes (black bar = 100 μm). d qPCR data of genes involved in adipogenesis (n ≥ 3) normalized to EtOH control (Lep = leptin, LPL = lipoprotein lipase, PPARγ = peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma, IRS2 = insulin receptor substrate 2, FASN = fatty acid synthase, SREBF1 = sterol receptor element binding factor 1, ESR1 = estrogen receptor alpha). e Targeted MassARRAY analysis of MEST promoter methylation, shown are the measurement of the single CpG cg17580798 covered by the amplicon (gray bars, n = 3) and the mean of the MassARRAY amplicon (black bars). f qPCR data of MEST (n ≥ 3, relative to EtOH control); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 from Student’s t test/ANOVA