| Literature DB >> 29721086 |
Silvia J Spa1,2, Mick M Welling1, Matthias N van Oosterom1, Daphne D D Rietbergen1,3, Mark C Burgmans4, Willem Verboom5, Jurriaan Huskens5, Tessa Buckle1, Fijs W B van Leeuwen1,2.
Abstract
Hepatic radioembolization therapies can suffer from discrepancies between diagnostic planning (scout-scan) and the therapeutic delivery itself, resulting in unwanted side-effects such as pulmonary shunting. We reasoned that a nanotechnology-based pre-targeting strategy could help overcome this shortcoming by directly linking pre-interventional diagnostics to the local delivery of therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Interventional radiology; Nanotechnology; Pre-targeting; Radioembolization; Supramolecular chemistry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29721086 PMCID: PMC5928896 DOI: 10.7150/thno.23567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the radioembolization tailored pre-targeting concept including the chemical and functional steps involved. A) Representation of the different chemical functionalities and components. B) I.v. pre-administered MAA-Ad (Bi) accumulated in the lungs (Bii). Subsequent i.v. administration of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 (Bii) resulted in pulmonary co-localization of MAA-Ad and 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 (Biii). C) Locally pre-administered MAA-Ad (Ci) accumulated in the liver (Cii). Following i.v. administration of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 (Cii), hepatic co-localization of both compounds was observed (Ciii).
Figure 2A) Fluorescence confocal microscopy-based evaluation of Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 (Cy5) binding to MAA-Ad (top) and non-functionalized MAA (bottom). The MAA-Ad-localized particles (brightfield) revealed a higher degree of staining compared to MAA alone, indicated by the higher Cy5-related fluorescence intensities (in red). B) The binding of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 to MAA-Ad and MAA quantified by radioactivity and expressed as a percentage of the total amount of radioactivity (99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39) added. Compared to non-functionalized MAA, binding of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 to MAA functionalized with the Ad guest moiety was 5.7 times higher (P < 0.01).
Figure 3Reference SPECT and biodistribution data of A) i.v.-administered 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39, and B) i.v.- or C) locally administered 99mTc-MAA-Ad. Organs are marked as (1) lungs, (2) liver, (3) kidneys, (4) stomach, and (5) urinary bladder.
Figure 4SPECT and biodistribution data of i.v.-administered 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 after pre-targeting with MAA or MAA-Ad either i.v.- (Model I) or locally (Model II) administered. A) Following i.v. administration of MAA, no pulmonary accumulation of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 was observed. B) i.v. pre-administered Ad-functionalized MAA did lead to pulmonary accumulation of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39. C) Following local administration of MAA, slight uptake in liver and kidneys occurred. D) After pre-targeting with MAA-Ad, the hepatic accumulation of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 was even more profound. Organs are marked as (1) lungs, (2) liver, (3) kidneys, (4) stomach, and (5) urinary bladder.
Biodistribution of i.v.-administered 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 and i.v.- or locally administered 99mTc-MAA-Ad.
| Reference distribution host | Reference distribution guest | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 99mTC-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA | Model I: 99mTc-MAA-Ad mean | Model II: 99mTc-MAA-Ad mean | |
| 2.4 ± 1.3 | 2.7 ± 0.9 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | |
| 1.7 ± 0.5 | 335.8 ± 38.7 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | |
| 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 2.4 | |
| 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 50.4 ± 15.4 | |
| 4.7 ± 1.3 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 15.3 ± 2.7 | |
| 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | |
| 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |
Data were calculated based on the radioactive counts measured in various tissues at 2 h post-injection of the radioactive tracer expressed as the mean of the percentage of the injected dose per gram tissue (%ID/g) of 5 observations.
Biodistribution of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 after pre-targeting with i.v.- (Model I) or locally (Model II) administered MAA or MAA-Ad.
| Distribution of host (99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39) following injection of indicated guest | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 ± 1.0 | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | |
| 1.6 ± 0.7 | 10.5 ± 4.6 | 1.4 ± 07 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | |
| 1.2 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 2.3 | 4.7 ± 1.3 | 10.4 ± 1.4 | |
| 2.2 ± 0.9 | 5.7 ± 0.9 | 8.7 ± 1.0 | 16.2 ± 0.7 | |
| 4.1 ± 1.7 | 6.6 ± 2.0 | 10.7 ± 0.8 | 19.6 ± 3.8 | |
| 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | |
| 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | |
Data were calculated based on the radioactive counts measured in various tissues at 2 h post-injection of the radioactive tracer expressed as the mean of the percentage of the injected dose per gram tissue (%ID/g) of 5 observations.
Figure 5Influence of MAA(-Ad) on the uptake of 99mTc-Cy50.5CD10PIBMA39 in the lungs and liver (Table 1 and 2). A) Uptake in the lungs increased when MAA-Ad was administered i.v. (Method I). B) Increasing uptake in the liver was seen when MAA-Ad was administered locally (Method II). The significance of difference (P < 0.01) is indicated with *.