| Literature DB >> 29721069 |
Alberto Izzotti1,2, Mariagrazia Longobardi1, Sebastiano La Maestra1, Rosanna T Micale1, Alessandra Pulliero1, Anna Camoirano1, Marta Geretto1, Francesco D'Agostini1, Roumen Balansky1,3, Mark Steven Miller4, Vernon E Steele4, Silvio De Flora1.
Abstract
Purpose: MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression, thereby playing a role in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological states. Exposure to cigarette smoke extensively downregulates microRNA expression in pulmonary cells of mice, rats, and humans. Cellular microRNAs are released into body fluids, but a poor parallelism was previously observed between lung microRNAs and circulating microRNAs. The purpose of the present study was to validate the application of this epigenetic biomarker by using less invasive collection procedures. Experimental design: Using microarray analyses, we measured 1135 microRNAs in 10 organs and 3 body fluids of mice that were either unexposed or exposed to mainstream cigarette smoke for up to 8 weeks. The results obtained with selected miRNAs were validated by qPCR.Entities:
Keywords: body fluids; cigarette smoke; interorgan distribution; microRNAs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29721069 PMCID: PMC5928877 DOI: 10.7150/thno.22726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of miRNA profiles. HCA compared the profiles of 1135 miRNAs in 10 organs and 3 body fluids of mice aged 4 months, either sham-exposed (left panel) or exposed whole-body to MCS for 8 weeks (middle panel). The right panel was generated by calculating the difference between MCS and Sham values.
Figure 2Bidimensional principal component analysis (PCA) of miRNA profiles. PCA compared the profiles of 1135 miRNAs in 10 organs and 3 body fluids from mice aged 4 months, either sham-exposed (upper panel) or exposed whole-body to MCS for 8 weeks (middle panel). The bottom panel was generated by calculating the difference between MCS and Sham. The contributions to variance in Sham were 40.7% for PCA1 (X axis), 26.1% for PCA2 (Y axis), and 4.9% for PCA3 (not shown), whereas the contributions to variance in MCS were 39.2% for PCA1, 27.9% for PCA2, and 5.3% for PCA3 (not shown).
Figure 3Comparative scatter plot analyses (SPA) of miRNA profiles. SPA evaluated the organotropism of MCS in modulating the profiles of 1135 miRNAs in 10 organs and 3 body fluids from mice aged 4 months, either sham-exposed (Y axis) or exposed whole-body to MCS for 8 weeks (X axis). Each dot represents a miRNA, whose expression intensity can be inferred from the position in the X and Y axes, according to a color scale (blue, low; yellow, medium; orange to red, high). Dots falling outside the diagonal two-fold variation interval (diagonal green lines) correspond to miRNAs that were dysregulated more than two-fold in their expression by MCS. Upregulated miRNAs are located in the lower-right area and downregulated miRNAs are in the upper-left area.
Figure 4Organotropism of miRNAs in MCS-exposed mice. The values indicate the numbers of miRNAs that were either downregulated or upregulated by MCS in each one of the examined mouse organs and body fluids.
Figure 5Contribution of 10 organs to the miRNA profiles of 3 body fluids from mice exposed whole-body to MCS for 8 weeks. The size of circles refers to the numbers of miRNAs that were significantly altered by MCS in their expression both in the indicated organ (Y axis) and body fluid (X axis). The reported values refer to the numbers of miRNAs that were either upregulated (blue portions) or downregulated (orange portions) both in the indicated organ and body fluid.
Figure 6Time-course modulation of miRNA profiles. The lines show the profiles of 1135 miRNAs in the lung, blood serum, and urines from mice aged 4 months, either sham-exposed (panels on the left) or exposed whole-body to MCS (panels on the right) for either 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks. The cluster of the miRNAs that were most strikingly modulated by MCS are highlighted in white.
Comparative evaluation by microarray and qPCR analyses of 3 miRNAs in organs of mice of both genders exposed to MCS. The results are expressed as MCS/Sham ratios.
| let -7e | miR-125b | miR-322-3p | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organ | Gender | microarray | qPCR | microarray | qPCR | microarray | qPCR | ||
| Lung | Males | 0.45* | 0.11* | 0.41* | 0.32* | 0.44* | 0.22* | ||
| Females | 0.27* | 0.69* | 0.38* | 0.29* | 0.52* | 0.81 | |||
| Heart | Males | 0.67* | 0.93 | 2.24* | 1.51 | ||||
| Females | 0.31* | 1.07 | 2.01* | 2.27* | |||||
| Spleen | Males | 0.31* | 0.73 | 7.08* | 7.64* | ||||
| Females | 0.38* | 0.42* | 4.42* | 8.32* | |||||
| Muscle | Males | 3.94* | 3.46* | 2.63* | 5.33* | ||||
| Females | 6.41* | 6.61* | 2.41* | 1.69 | |||||
| Liver | Males | 5.50* | 2.09* | ||||||
| Females | 9.84* | 7.14* | |||||||
| Kidney | Males | 9.36* | 7.06* | ||||||
| Females | 5.40* | 7.11* | |||||||
* P < 0.05, MCS vs. Sham