Literature DB >> 29721060

Shared liver-like transcriptional characteristics in liver metastases and corresponding primary colorectal tumors.

Jun Cheng1, Xuekun Song2, Lu Ao1, Rou Chen1, Meirong Chi1, You Guo1, Jiahui Zhang1, Hongdong Li1, Wenyuan Zhao2, Zheng Guo1,2,3, Xianlong Wang1.   

Abstract

Background & Aims: Primary tumors of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) with liver metastasis might gain some liver-specific characteristics to adapt the liver micro-environment. This study aims to reveal potential liver-like transcriptional characteristics associated with the liver metastasis in primary colorectal carcinoma.
Methods: Among the genes up-regulated in normal liver tissues versus normal colorectal tissues, we identified "liver-specific" genes whose expression levels ranked among the bottom 10% ("unexpressed") of all measured genes in both normal colorectal tissues and primary colorectal tumors without metastasis. These liver-specific genes were investigated for their expressions in both the primary tumors and the corresponding liver metastases of seven primary CRC patients with liver metastasis using microdissected samples.
Results: Among the 3958 genes detected to be up-regulated in normal liver tissues versus normal colorectal tissues, we identified 12 liver-specific genes and found two of them, ANGPTL3 and CFHR5, were unexpressed in microdissected primary colorectal tumors without metastasis but expressed in both microdissected liver metastases and corresponding primary colorectal tumors (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05). Genes co-expressed with ANGPTL3 and CFHR5 were significantly enriched in metabolism pathways characterizing liver tissues, including "starch and sucrose metabolism" and "drug metabolism-cytochrome P450". Conclusions: For primary CRC with liver metastasis, both the liver metastases and corresponding primary colorectal tumors may express some liver-specific genes which may help the tumor cells adapt the liver micro-environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; liver metastasis; micro-environment; microdissection; transcriptional characteristics

Year:  2018        PMID: 29721060      PMCID: PMC5929095          DOI: 10.7150/jca.23017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant cancers1,2 and liver is recognized as the most frequent metastasis site of CRCs. About 20~25% of CRC patients are accompanied with liver metastases at the initial diagnosis, 40~50% of patients eventually developed the liver metastasis after resection operations3,4, and more than two thirds of mortalities are attributable to metastases5,6. It has been found that the tumors from the primary and the corresponding metastatic lesions are highly consistent in transcription7,8, somatic mutation9, copy number and other genetic characteristics10 though some minor differences may exist in both genome8,11 and transcriptome7,12. In addition, it has been reported that some genes such as PTEN13 and AURKA14 with similar expression levels in the primary colorectal tumors and the corresponding liver metastases are associated with prognosis. Thus, the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health recommended that patients with metastasis should be treated based on the characteristics of the primary tumors. In current clinical practices, the same or similar therapeutic regimens for CRC, including FOLFOX, 5-fluorouracil/leucovorinand (5-FU/LV) and capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin (CapeOX) or capecitabine monotherapy15-17, are commonly used to treat the patients with liver metastasis. However, the underlying molecular mechanism for the tissue-specific metastasis of CRCs remains elusive. Considering that cancer cells may gain metastatic characteristics in primary lesions18,19, we hypothesized that CRC patients with liver metastases may express some “liver-specific” genes in both the primary colorectal tumors and liver metastases in order to adapt to the microenvironment of liver tissues19-21. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports on whether the primary colorectal tumors with liver metastases may gain some liver-specific transcriptional characteristics or not. Therefore, it would be of great importance to understand the mechanism of liver-targeted metastasis of CRCs and adjust clinical treatments to patients with liver metastasis on the basis of the liver-like characteristics, rather than on the molecular features of CRC alone22,23. In this study, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of normal colorectal tissues, normal liver tissues, tumors of primary CRCs without metastasis, tumors of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and paired primary colorectal tumors and liver metastases. Among 3958 genes up-regulated in normal liver tissues versus normal colorectal tissues, we identified 12 liver-specific genes which were virtually not expressed in either normal colorectal tissues or tumors of primary CRCs without metastasis but highly expressed in liver tissues. Especially, two of these liver-specific genes, ANGPTL3 and CFHR5, were also expressed in microdissected liver metastases and corresponding primary colorectal tumors. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that the genes whose expression levels were correlated with the expression levels of ANGPTL3 and CFHR5 were significantly enriched in liver-characteristic metabolism pathways. In short, both the liver metastases and corresponding primary colorectal tumors might express some genes which are specifically expressed in liver tissue to help cancer cells adapt the liver micro-environment.

Materials and Methods

Data and preprocessing

The gene expression profiles used in this study were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/)24, as described in Table 1. The raw mRNA expression datasets (.CEL files) measured by the Affymetrix platform were preprocessed using the Robust Multi-array Average algorithm25. Probe-set IDs were mapped to their Entrez gene IDs with the corresponding platform files. If multiple probes were mapped to a gene, the arithmetic mean of the expression values of those probes was used to represent the expression value of the gene.
Table 1

Datasets analyzed in the study

DatasetMicroarray PlatformTissue Type*Sample Size
GSE40367GPL570pCRC#7
mCRC#7
pHCC#10
normal liver5
GSE28702GPL570mCRC23
pCRC56
GSE41258GPL96normal liver13
normal colon54
GSE21510GPL570mCRC#66
GSE17536pCRC103
GSE8671normal colon32
GSE925419
GSE2151025
GSE3736438
GSE45267GPL570normal liver39
pHCC48

*pCRC, primary colorectal tumor samples; mCRC, colorectal-liver metastasis; and pHCC,

primary hepatocellular carcinoma samples. #represented that the samples were microdissected.

As described in Table 1, 114 normal colon samples detected by the GPL570 platform were collected from four datasets, including GSE8671 (32 samples), GSE9254 (19 samples), GSE21510 (25 samples) and GSE37364 (38 samples), respectively. Notably, the dataset GSE41258 detected by the GPL96 platform included 54 normal colon samples, 13 normal liver samples and 323 samples for primary colon tumors, liver metastases, lung metastases, microadenomas, normal lung tissues, ployps and cell lines. In this study, we only used the expression profiles of the 54 normal colon samples and the 13 normal liver samples for the analysis of differentially expressed genes between the two types of tissues. Here, the samples of the microdissected primary colon tumors and the unmatched liver metastases in GSE41258 were not analyzed because we focused on the analysis of the microdissected primary colon tumors and the matched liver metastases in order to eliminate the contamination of the residual liver tissues in samples of liver metastases. And in order to validate that the “liver-specific” genes are not expressed in primary colon tumors without liver metastases, we only analyzed the 103 samples of stages I-III primary CRCs without metastasis from GSE17536, excluding other 74 samples of stage IV patients or patients who experienced recurrence after curative surgery which indicated potential occult metastases26.

Statistical analysis

Student's t-test was used to detect differentially expressed genes between two groups of samples. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between the expression levels of genes. Functional enrichment analysis was performed based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/)27. And the P values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure28.

Identification of non-expressed genes in a tissue

For each sample, all genes were ranked according to their expression values. Those genes, which were ranked among the bottom 10% both in more than 95% of tumor tissues and in 95% of normal tissues for the same organ, were defined as the non-expressed genes in this organ, taking into account the background measurement noise and variation in the microarray techniques29,30.

Results

Identification of “liver-specific” genes

Using 13 normal liver samples and 54 normal colorectal samples from GSE41258, we identified 3958 dysregulated genes (DEGs) that were up-regulated in normal liver tissues compared with normal colorectal tissues (Student's t test, FDR < 5%). From these genes, we searched genes that were unexpressed in either normal colorectal tissues or colorectal tumors of primary CRCs without metastasis using a rank-based method. We found 82 genes whose expression values were ranked among the bottom 10% of all the measured 20486 genes in more than 95% of 114 normal colorectal tissue samples collected from 4 datasets (GSE8671, GE9254, GSE21510 and GSE37364) and in more than 95% of 103 tumors of stages I-III primary CRCs without metastasis from GSE17536. Considering the existence of large measurement variations and background noises of high-throughput gene expression profiling techniques29,30, we defined these genes as non-expressed genes in either normal colorectal tissues or tumors of primary CRCs without metastasis. Among the 82 genes, the mean expression levels of 12 genes, including C9, CYP7A1, F13B, GC, GYS2, IGFBP1, MBL2, SLC2A2, AKR1D1, UGT2B4, ANGPTL3 and CFHR5, were ranked among the top 50% of all the measured genes in all the 39 samples of normal liver tissues and all the 48 tumor tissues of HCCs from GSE45267 and in the 5 samples of microdissected normal liver tissues and 10 microdissected tumor tissues of HCCs from the GSE40367 dataset, as shown in Figure 1. This indicated that these 12 genes were expressed in both the normal liver tissues and HCCs. Therefore, we defined these genes as liver-specific genes (see Figure 1).
Figure 1

The ranks of expression levels of 12 liver-specific genes in four types of tissues: Colorectal tissues included 114 normal colorectal tissues (red) and 103 Primary CRCs without metastasis (blue); 48 HCCs (green); 39 normal liver tissues (black).

We further analyzed the expression patterns of the 12 liver-specific genes in 7 paired microdissected liver metastases and primary colorectal tumors. The microdissection technique was used to eliminate the possibility that residual liver tissues might contaminate the tumor samples. The result showed that 2 of the 12 genes, ANGPTL3 and CFHR5, were expressed at both the primary and metastatic sites: the expression levels of ANGPTL3 were ranked higher than the bottom 10% within each of paired primary colorectal tumors and metastatic liver tumors; the expression levels of CFHR5 were ranked higher than the bottom 10% in 6 out of the 7 paired samples. And the mean rank percentiles of the expression levels for ANGPTL3 and CFHR5 were 21.71% and 37.87% in primary colorectal tumors, respectively, and 16.70% and 21.23% in liver metastases, respectively (see Figure 2). Furthermore, these 2 genes were unexpressed in all 66 microdissected tumor tissues of stages I-III primary CRCs without metastasis from the GSE21510 dataset, which were unlikely to happen by chance (Fisher's exact test, P <0.05).
Figure 2

The ranks of expression levels of ANGPTL3 and CFHR5 in 7 paired microdissected primary colorectal tumors and liver metastases.

The above results suggested that both the liver metastases and corresponding primary colorectal tumors might express some liver tissue-specific genes to adapt the liver micro-environment for CRC patients with liver metastasis.

Functional analysis of ANGPTL3 and CFHR5

The two liver-specific genes, ANGPTL3 and CFHR5, were further analyzed for their biological functions. Using 23 liver metastasis samples of primary CRC patients from GSE28702, we found that the expression levels of 267 genes were significantly correlated with the expression level of ANGPTL3 (FDR< 5%, Pearson's correlation analysis). These 267 genes were significantly enriched in 15 functional pathways including “tyrosine metabolism”, “drug metabolism-cytochrome P450”, “starch and sucrose metabolism” and “drug metabolism-other enzymes” (see Table 2). Similarly, the expressions of 367 genes were found significantly correlated with the expression of CFHR5 and they were significantly enriched in 9 functional pathways characterizing liver tissues, including “tyrosine metabolism” and “drug metabolism-cytochrome P450” besides others (see Table 2). The results indicated that the tumor cells might gain some transcriptional characteristics of liver that might help them adapt the liver microenvironment.
Table 2

KEGG pathways enriched with the genes significantly co-expressed with ANGPTL3 and CFHR5, respectively.

KEGG pathwayP-value
ANGPTL3-correlated genes
Complement and coagulation cascades2.20E-16
Retinol metabolism1.11E-16
Drug metabolism-cytochrome P4501.61E-11
Bile secretion9.07E-10
Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P4501.03E-08
Fatty acid degradation5.67E-07
Tyrosine metabolism3.72E-05
Drug metabolism - other enzymes1.06E-04
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism2.46E-04
Steroid hormone biosynthesis5.03E-04
Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis9.90E-04
PPAR signaling pathway1.19E-03
Starch and sucrose metabolism2.46E-03
Fat digestion and absorption2.46E-03
Linoleic acid metabolism2.54E-03
CFHR5-correlated genes
Complement and coagulation cascades2.20E-16
Retinol metabolism3.42E-12
Drug metabolism-cytochrome P4506.21E-10
Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P4502.30E-08
Bile secretion3.09E-08
Steroid hormone biosynthesis5.42E-06
Fatty acid degradation4.56E-05
Drug metabolism - other enzymes4.62E-04
Tyrosine metabolism1.38E-03

Discussion

As demonstrated in this study, for primary CRC patients with liver metastasis, both the liver metastases and corresponding primary colorectal tumors shared some transcriptional features of livers. Especially, we identified two liver-specific genes, ANGPTL3 and CFHR5, which were expressed in livers and in the matched liver metastases and corresponding primary colorectal tumors, but not expressed in normal colorectal tissues or in colorectal tumors of the primary CRCs without metastasis. Functional enrichment analysis on those genes significantly correlated with the two genes in the expression patterns found a number of liver-characteristic metabolic pathways31-33. In addition, it has been reported that protein ANGPTL3 is associated with tumor development and invasion by inducing endothelial cell adhesion and migration through stimulating the integrin signaling pathway and promoting angiogenesis34-36. Protein ANGPTL3 could also stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK/MAPK) signaling pathway related to cell-cycle G1/S transition37,38 and proliferation39. Protein CFHR5 is a plasma glycoprotein generated in liver and can increase the risk of metastasis40. Taken together, our analysis suggested that primary colorectal tumors may express some liver tissue-specific genes to help CRC cells adapt the liver micro-environment in the metastases to liver. In clinical practice, the same or similar therapeutic regimens for the treatment of the primary CRC cancer were used to treat those patients with liver metastases15-17. However, as shown here, the metastasized tumors possessed some features of liver including enhanced metabolic efficiency on drugs. The results suggested that when developing therapeutic regimens for the patients with liver metastasis, we should consider the liver-like characteristics of the metastatic cancers, possibly through combining the anti-tumor agents for primary colorectal tumor with the anti-tumor agents of liver cancer (such as sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor for treatment of HCC)15. For example, among 3164 DEGs between 23 liver metastases and 56 non-paired primary colorectal tumors from the GSE28702 dataset (Student's t-test, FDR < 5%), two targeted genes of sorafenib41, KIT42 and FLT443, were significantly up-regulated (KIT) and down-regulated (FLT4) in the liver metastases compared with primary colorectal tumors. Eighteen DEGs have direct protein-protein interaction (PPI) links with KIT and FLT4, indicating that sorafenib might be an effective molecular targeting drug for the treatment of the CRC patients with liver metastasis (see Figure 3).
Figure 3

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) links between the DEGs (ellipses) and the target genes of anti-liver cancer drugs (triangles): pink for down-regulated genes and cyan for up-regulated genes.

One limitation of this study is that the size of microdissected samples is not very large. In order to further confirm and elucidate the biological characteristics of the metastatic tumors, more and purer tumor samples, even single cells, should be collected from the primary and metastatic lesions19,44. To gain new insights on the molecular characteristics of the metastases will be of great importance to develop individualized treatment to improve the survival of the CRC patients with liver metastases.
  44 in total

Review 1.  Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms.

Authors:  Scott Valastyan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  O J Garden; M Rees; G J Poston; D Mirza; M Saunders; J Ledermann; J N Primrose; R W Parks
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements.

Authors:  Leming Shi; Laura H Reid; Wendell D Jones; Richard Shippy; Janet A Warrington; Shawn C Baker; Patrick J Collins; Francoise de Longueville; Ernest S Kawasaki; Kathleen Y Lee; Yuling Luo; Yongming Andrew Sun; James C Willey; Robert A Setterquist; Gavin M Fischer; Weida Tong; Yvonne P Dragan; David J Dix; Felix W Frueh; Frederico M Goodsaid; Damir Herman; Roderick V Jensen; Charles D Johnson; Edward K Lobenhofer; Raj K Puri; Uwe Schrf; Jean Thierry-Mieg; Charles Wang; Mike Wilson; Paul K Wolber; Lu Zhang; Shashi Amur; Wenjun Bao; Catalin C Barbacioru; Anne Bergstrom Lucas; Vincent Bertholet; Cecilie Boysen; Bud Bromley; Donna Brown; Alan Brunner; Roger Canales; Xiaoxi Megan Cao; Thomas A Cebula; James J Chen; Jing Cheng; Tzu-Ming Chu; Eugene Chudin; John Corson; J Christopher Corton; Lisa J Croner; Christopher Davies; Timothy S Davison; Glenda Delenstarr; Xutao Deng; David Dorris; Aron C Eklund; Xiao-hui Fan; Hong Fang; Stephanie Fulmer-Smentek; James C Fuscoe; Kathryn Gallagher; Weigong Ge; Lei Guo; Xu Guo; Janet Hager; Paul K Haje; Jing Han; Tao Han; Heather C Harbottle; Stephen C Harris; Eli Hatchwell; Craig A Hauser; Susan Hester; Huixiao Hong; Patrick Hurban; Scott A Jackson; Hanlee Ji; Charles R Knight; Winston P Kuo; J Eugene LeClerc; Shawn Levy; Quan-Zhen Li; Chunmei Liu; Ying Liu; Michael J Lombardi; Yunqing Ma; Scott R Magnuson; Botoul Maqsodi; Tim McDaniel; Nan Mei; Ola Myklebost; Baitang Ning; Natalia Novoradovskaya; Michael S Orr; Terry W Osborn; Adam Papallo; Tucker A Patterson; Roger G Perkins; Elizabeth H Peters; Ron Peterson; Kenneth L Philips; P Scott Pine; Lajos Pusztai; Feng Qian; Hongzu Ren; Mitch Rosen; Barry A Rosenzweig; Raymond R Samaha; Mark Schena; Gary P Schroth; Svetlana Shchegrova; Dave D Smith; Frank Staedtler; Zhenqiang Su; Hongmei Sun; Zoltan Szallasi; Zivana Tezak; Danielle Thierry-Mieg; Karol L Thompson; Irina Tikhonova; Yaron Turpaz; Beena Vallanat; Christophe Van; Stephen J Walker; Sue Jane Wang; Yonghong Wang; Russ Wolfinger; Alex Wong; Jie Wu; Chunlin Xiao; Qian Xie; Jun Xu; Wen Yang; Liang Zhang; Sheng Zhong; Yaping Zong; William Slikker
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  A flexible renewal process simulator for neural spike trains.

Authors:  B F Belanger; W J Williams; T C Yin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy.

Authors:  Scott Kopetz; George J Chang; Michael J Overman; Cathy Eng; Daniel J Sargent; David W Larson; Axel Grothey; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; David M Nagorney; Robert R McWilliams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Metastatic potential: generic predisposition of the primary tumor or rare, metastatic variants-or both?

Authors:  Richard O Hynes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.

Authors:  David S Wishart; Craig Knox; An Chi Guo; Savita Shrivastava; Murtaza Hassanali; Paul Stothard; Zhan Chang; Jennifer Woolsey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Integrative genomic and transcriptomic characterization of matched primary and metastatic liver and colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Stephanie Roessler; Guoling Lin; Marshonna Forgues; Anuradha Budhu; Shelley Hoover; R Mark Simpson; Xiaolin Wu; Ping He; Lun-Xiu Qin; Zhao-You Tang; Qing-Hai Ye; Xin Wei Wang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  A Positive TGF-β/c-KIT Feedback Loop Drives Tumor Progression in Advanced Primary Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Andres Rojas; Pingyu Zhang; Ying Wang; Wai Chin Foo; Nina M Muñoz; Lianchun Xiao; Jing Wang; Gregory J Gores; Mien-Chie Hung; Boris Blechacz
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  Spatio-temporal mutation profiles of case-matched colorectal carcinomas and their metastases reveal unique de novo mutations in metachronous lung metastases by targeted next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Valentina Kovaleva; Anna-Lena Geissler; Lisa Lutz; Ralph Fritsch; Frank Makowiec; Sebastian Wiesemann; Ulrich T Hopt; Bernward Passlick; Martin Werner; Silke Lassmann
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.