Literature DB >> 2972073

The use of pain drawings in screening for psychological involvement in complaints of low-back pain.

J Hildebrandt1, C E Franz, B Choroba-Mehnen, M Temme.   

Abstract

The pain drawings of 54 low-back-pain patients were examined to find out if it is possible to use them as a brief screening test in order to assess the psychological impairment of the patients. We were using the scoring system of Ransford et al, which we slightly changed, and chose as a criterion variable the ERMSS (Erweiterte Revidierte Mehrdimensionale Schmerzskala) of Cziske. This test originates in the McGill Pain Questionnaire of Melzack and Torgerson; its scales describe four dimensions of pain perception: pain intensity, the sensory-discriminative dimension reflecting the somatic aspect of pain; the affective-motivational dimension, and the total number of words, both representing the psychological involvement of a pain patient. A correlation was found between pain drawing score and the sensory-discriminative dimension of pain perception, whereas there was no such correlation between drawing score and the affective dimension. These results indicate that the pain drawing score might not be a sufficiently valid instrument for assessing psychological disturbances in pain patients to allow it to be used for individual diagnosis without hesitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2972073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  [Psychometric properties of the pain drawing and the Ransford technique in patients with chronic low back pain].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; M Baller; H Liebeck; J Strube; J Hildebrandt; P Schöps
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Localizing value of pain distribution patterns in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Krishnapundha Bunyaratavej; Peerapong Montriwiwatnchai; Rungsak Siwanuwatn; Surachai Khaoroptham
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Accuracy of physical therapists' prognosis of low back pain from the clinical examination: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Emma-Marie Kingan
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

Review 4.  Disorders characterised by pain: a methodological review of population surveys.

Authors:  H Raspe; T Kohlmann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Colored Pain Drawing as a Clinical Tool in Differentiating Neuropathic Pain from Non-Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Nalini Sehgal; Debra B Gordon; Scott Hetzel; Miroslav Misha Backonja
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Pain 5 years after instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Ebbe S Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Pain drawing in the evaluation of low back pain.

Authors:  K Takata; H Hirotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Multidisciplinary treatment program on chronic low back pain, part 3. Psychosocial aspects].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; C Franz; J Hildebrandt; P Saur; D Seeger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-12-16       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Computer-aided surface estimation of pain drawings - intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  Ann L Persson; Sofia Garametsos; Jonna Pedersen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  The accuracy of pain drawing in identifying psychological distress in low back pain-systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.

Authors:  Lucia Bertozzi; Anna Rosso; Antonio Romeo; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Andrew A Guccione; Paolo Pillastrini; Carla Vanti
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.