Literature DB >> 29720289

Consistency is key: interactions of current and previous farrowing system on litter size and piglet mortality.

R L King1, E M Baxter2, S M Matheson1, S A Edwards1.   

Abstract

Global interest in alternative indoor farrowing systems is increasing, leading to a growing number of farms utilising such systems alongside standard crates. There is evidence that interchanging sows between different farrowing systems affects maternal behaviour, whilst the subsequent effect of this on piglet mortality is unknown. The current study hypothesised that second parity piglet mortality would be higher if a sow farrowed in a different farrowing system to that of her first parity. Retrospective farm performance records were used from 753 sows during their first and second parities. Sows farrowed in either standard crates (crates), temporary crates (360s) or straw-bedded pens (pens), with mortality recorded as occurring either pre- or post-processing. Inter- and intra-parity sow consistency in performance were also investigated. Overall, total piglet mortality reduced from the first to the second parity, being significantly higher in the crates and higher in the 360s during the first or second parity, respectively. In the second parity, an interaction of the current and previous farrowing systems resulted in the lowest incidence of crushing for sows housed in the same system as their first parity for the crates and pens, but not the 360s. Post-processing mortality was significantly higher in the crates if a sow previously farrowed in the 360s and vice versa. Sows which previously farrowed in a pen had a significantly larger litter size and lower pre-processing mortality from crushing in their second parity than sows previously housed in the crates or the 360s. No inter-parity consistency of sow performance was found, whilst intra-parity consistency was found in the first but not second parity. In conclusion, returning sows to the same farrowing system appears to reduce piglet mortality, whilst farrowing in a pen during the first parity significantly increased second parity litter size without increasing piglet mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  free farrowing; maternal behaviour; sow experience; sow performance; temporary crating

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29720289     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118000927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  7 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Circ0001470 Acts as a miR-140-3p Sponge to Facilitate the Progression of Embryonic Development through Regulating PTGFR Expression.

Authors:  Long Zhang; Changfan Zhou; Xiaoyu Jiang; Shuntao Huang; Yiheng Li; Tao Su; Guowei Wang; You Zhou; Min Liu; Dequan Xu
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 7.666

3.  The Effect of Sows' and Piglets' Behaviour on Piglet Crushing Patterns in Two Different Farrowing Pen Systems.

Authors:  Thies Nicolaisen; Eyke Lühken; Nina Volkmann; Karl Rohn; Nicole Kemper; Michaela Fels
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Review of Temporary Crating of Farrowing and Lactating Sows.

Authors:  Sébastien Goumon; Gudrun Illmann; Vivi A Moustsen; Emma M Baxter; Sandra A Edwards
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-17

5.  Positive Human Contact and Housing Systems Impact the Responses of Piglets to Various Stressors.

Authors:  Megan E Hayes; Lauren M Hemsworth; Rebecca S Morrison; Alan J Tilbrook; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Comparison of three different farrowing systems: skin lesions and behaviour of sows with special regard to nursing behaviour in a group housing system for lactating sows.

Authors:  T Nicolaisen; B Risch; E Lühken; C van Meegen; M Fels; N Kemper
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of Duration of Farrowing Crate Closure on Physical Indicators of Sow Welfare and Piglet Mortality.

Authors:  Maria Camila Ceballos; Karen Camille Rocha Góis; Thomas D Parsons; Meghann Pierdon
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.