Literature DB >> 29720229

Early achievement of deep remission predicts low incidence of renal flare in lupus nephritis class III or IV.

Hironari Hanaoka1, Harunobu Iida2, Tomofumi Kiyokawa2, Yukiko Takakuwa2, Kimito Kawahata2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29720229      PMCID: PMC5932878          DOI: 10.1186/s13075-018-1576-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther        ISSN: 1478-6354            Impact factor:   5.156


× No keyword cloud information.

Recommendations for lupus nephritis (LN) management specify that the therapeutic target should be a complete renal response (CR) [1], defined as a urine protein:Cr ratio (UPCR) of 0.5 g/gCr (50 mg/mmol) and normal or near-normal renal function. Earlier studies suggested that patients who achieved CR experienced fewer renal flares than those who achieved partial remission, defined as a 50% reduction of proteinuria [2]. Among patients who achieved CR (less than 0.50 g/gCr of UPCR), however, the renal outcome of those who achieved a value below the normal UPCR limit of 0.15 g/gCr was unclear. We recently reported that an early renal response may predict a good renal or systemic outcome [3, 4]. In this study, we investigated whether it is beneficial to achieve deep remission early by evaluating flare rate, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI), cumulative glucocorticoid dose, and eGFR level. We retrospectively assessed 69 patients with biopsy-proven LN class III or IV who achieved CR in our hospital. We divided them into two groups based on whether deep remission was achieved, defined as less than 0.15 g/gCr UPCR, and compared cumulative flare rates [1], defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreasing by ≥ 10%, active urine sediment, or increasing UPCR > 1.0 g/gCr after achieving CR. Furthermore, we analyzed the additional effect of early achievement of CR, defined as CR within 3 months after induction therapy. Clinical characteristics between the two groups were compared using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. Frequencies of clinicopathological characteristics were compared using the Chi-square test. Cumulative flare free rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between the two groups were tested with a log-rank test. To identify independent parameters that predict CR at 3 years, we performed multivariate analysis. During the 3-year period, 55 of 69 CR patients achieved deep remission while 14 did not. Among clinical features at baseline, the proportion of females was significantly higher among patients with deep remission (p = 0.01; Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline clinical and renal pathological features of LN patients with or without deep remission

Baseline characteristicsDeep remission p
Achieved (n = 55)Not achieved (n = 14)
Sex (percentage female)48 (87.3)9 (64.2)0.01
Age (years)39.1 ± 12.439.9 ± 10.70.3
BMI (kg/m2)22.4 ± 3.320.9 ± 2.30.5
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)127.8 ± 17.0136.4 ± 21.50.2
Diastolic blood pressure79.7 ± 13.683.6 ± 14.50.3
Disease duration (years)5.1 ± 6.88.0 ± 6.40.4
SLEDAI15.6 ± 4.813.0 ± 4.80.4
SDI0.4 ± 0.60.6 ± 0.80.7
Proteinuria (g/gCr)2.7 ± 2.13.7 ± 1.80.07
eGFR (mL/min)76.6 ± 28.272.2 ± 32.80.9
Anti-dsDNA antibody (IU/mL)177 ± 274112 ± 1160.6
Anti-cardiolipin antibody (IU/mL)21.8 ± 30.714.7 ± 28.50.5
Lupus anticoagulant-positive (%)3 (5.5)1 (7.1)0.6
CH50 (U/ml)17.1 ± 9.324.4 ± 14.20.06
Prednisolone (mg/day)45.5 ± 15.137.1 ± 10.10.08
Induction therapy
 IVCY (%)29 (52.7)5 (35.7)0.4
 MMF (%)8 (14.5)2 (14.3)0.9
 Tacrolimus (%)8 (14.5)2 (14.3)0.9
 PSL monotherapy (%)6 (10.9)2 (14.3)0.8
 Others (%)4 (7.3)3 (21.4)0.1
Renal pathological findings
 ISN/RPS classification
  III or III + V (%)26 (47.3)5 (35.7)0.4
  IV or IV + V (%)29 (52.7)9 (64.3)0.4
Endocapillary hypercellularity (%)39.2 ± 18.646.0 ± 30.20.5
Leukocyte infiltration (%)2.0 ± 4.92.2 ± 4.10.4
Subendothelial hyaline deposits (%)29.1 ± 30.230.1 ± 28.90.3
Fibrinoid necrosis/karyorrhexis (%)7.0 ± 11.18.1 ± 18.10.3
Cellular crescents (%)7.0 ± 11.18.1 ± 18.10.7
Interstitial inflammation (%)2.1 ± 3.72.3 ± 7.40.5
Glomerular sclerosis (%)2.5 ± 7.13.9 ± 8.20.4
Fibrous crescents (%)2.1 ± 2.02.2 ± 3.10.7
Tubular atrophy (%)2.8 ± 4.73.3 ± 5.90.5
Interstitial fibrosis (%)4.7 ± 6.85.1 ± 5.90.6
Activity index5.2 ± 3.05.1 ± 3.80.5
Chronicity index1.4 ± 0.41.4 ± 1.30.7

dsDNA double-stranded DNA, IVCY intravenous cyclophosphamide, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, SDI Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index, SLEDAI Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index

Baseline clinical and renal pathological features of LN patients with or without deep remission dsDNA double-stranded DNA, IVCY intravenous cyclophosphamide, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, SDI Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index, SLEDAI Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index We found a significantly higher flare-free rate among patients who achieved deep remission compared with those who did not (p = 0.001; Fig. 1a). For patients with deep remission, those with early CR had a higher flare-free rate than those without (p = 0.04) (Fig. 1b), but significant difference was found in those with non-deep remission (Fig. 1c). Multivariate analysis to predict sustained CR indicated that early achievement of deep remission was an independent factor (odds ratio 3.62, 95% confidence interval 1.1–18.9, p = 0.05). Regarding SDI, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, and eGFR level at year 3, patients with early deep remission had the most favorable result compared to the other groups (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Cumulative renal relapse-free rate in the 3 years after induction therapy. Comparison of relapse-free rate between patients with deep remission and those without (a). Comparison of relapse-free rate between patients with early remission and those without among patients who had achieved deep remission (b) and non-deep remission (c)

Fig. 2

Comparison of SDI, glucocorticoid dose, and eGFR level at year 3. Patients were divided into four groups depending on achievement of deep remission and early CR and SDI (a), glucocorticoid dose (b), and eGFR level (c) were compared among them. SDI Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index, GC glucocorticoid, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate. The error bars represent mean ± SD

Cumulative renal relapse-free rate in the 3 years after induction therapy. Comparison of relapse-free rate between patients with deep remission and those without (a). Comparison of relapse-free rate between patients with early remission and those without among patients who had achieved deep remission (b) and non-deep remission (c) Comparison of SDI, glucocorticoid dose, and eGFR level at year 3. Patients were divided into four groups depending on achievement of deep remission and early CR and SDI (a), glucocorticoid dose (b), and eGFR level (c) were compared among them. SDI Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index, GC glucocorticoid, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate. The error bars represent mean ± SD In this study, we found that achieving early and deep remission predicts a good renal outcome in patients with LN class III or IV. Since renal flare predicts a worse prognosis [5], determining the method of treatment to ensure long-term maintenance of CR is challenging. Our results suggest that deep remission might be a more beneficial therapeutic goal than that of the EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations regarding the prevention of renal flare. A future multi-center, prospective study is required to confirm our findings.
  5 in total

1.  Early achievement of complete renal response predicts good long-term renal outcome and low systemic damage in newly diagnosed lupus nephritis class III or IV.

Authors:  Hironari Hanaoka; Yuko Kaneko; Masataka Kuwana; Tsutomu Takeuchi
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.023

2.  Renal flares are common in patients with severe proliferative lupus nephritis treated with pulse immunosuppressive therapy: long-term followup of a cohort of 145 patients participating in randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  G G Illei; K Takada; D Parkin; H A Austin; M Crane; C H Yarboro; E M Vaughan; T Kuroiwa; C L Danning; J Pando; A D Steinberg; M F Gourley; J H Klippel; J E Balow; D T Boumpas
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-04

3.  Renal flare as a predictor of incident and progressive CKD in patients with lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Samir V Parikh; Haikady N Nagaraja; Lee Hebert; Brad H Rovin
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Lack of partial renal response by 12 weeks after induction therapy predicts poor renal response and systemic damage accrual in lupus nephritis class III or IV.

Authors:  Hironari Hanaoka; Hidehiro Yamada; Tomofumi Kiyokawa; Harunobu Iida; Takeshi Suzuki; Yoshioki Yamasaki; Seido Ooka; Hiroko Nagafuchi; Takahiro Okazaki; Daisuke Ichikawa; Sayuri Shirai; Yugo Shibagaki; Junki Koike; Shoichi Ozaki
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis.

Authors:  George K Bertsias; Maria Tektonidou; Zahir Amoura; Martin Aringer; Ingeborg Bajema; Jo H M Berden; John Boletis; Ricard Cervera; Thomas Dörner; Andrea Doria; Franco Ferrario; Jürgen Floege; Frederic A Houssiau; John P A Ioannidis; David A Isenberg; Cees G M Kallenberg; Liz Lightstone; Stephen D Marks; Alberto Martini; Gabriela Moroni; Irmgard Neumann; Manuel Praga; Matthias Schneider; Argyre Starra; Vladimir Tesar; Carlos Vasconcelos; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Helena Zakharova; Marion Haubitz; Caroline Gordon; David Jayne; Dimitrios T Boumpas
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 19.103

  5 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Lupus Nephritis: Improving Treatment Options.

Authors:  Myrto Kostopoulou; Sofia Pitsigavdaki; George Bertsias
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Prognostic value of modified National Institute of Health activity and chronicity scoring in determining complete renal response in newly diagnosed lupus nephritis: a retrospective single centre study.

Authors:  Shivendra Singh; H C Sreenidhi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  The ISN/RPS 2016 classification predicts renal prognosis in patients with first-onset class III/IV lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Asaka Hachiya; Munetoshi Karasawa; Takahiro Imaizumi; Noritoshi Kato; Takayuki Katsuno; Takuji Ishimoto; Tomoki Kosugi; Naotake Tsuboi; Shoichi Maruyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Outcomes of membranous and proliferative lupus nephritis - analysis of a single-centre cohort with more than 30 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Filipa Farinha; Ruth J Pepper; Daniel G Oliveira; Thomas McDonnell; David A Isenberg; Anisur Rahman
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 7.046

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.