| Literature DB >> 29720206 |
Ritesh Mistry1, Andrew D Jones2, Mangesh S Pednekar3, Gauri Dhumal3, Anjuli Dasika4, Ujwala Kulkarni2, Mangala Gomare5, Prakash C Gupta3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In India, tobacco use during pregnancy is not routinely addressed during antenatal care. We measured the association between tobacco use and anemia in low-income pregnant women, and identified ways to integrate tobacco cessation into existing antenatal care at primary health centers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29720206 PMCID: PMC5932801 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0516-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Characteristics of pregnant participants (n = 100)
| number of participants | |
|---|---|
| Age in years (mean = 25.5; SD = 0.5) | |
| 18–19 | 7 |
| 20–29 | 72 |
| 30–39 | 18 |
| 40–41 | 1 |
| Missing | 2 |
| Parity | |
| 0 | 43 |
| 1 | 32 |
| 2 or more | 25 |
| Currently Married | 100 |
| Education | |
| None | 6 |
| Primary or middle school (grade 1–7) | 22 |
| Secondary school (grade 8–12) | 62 |
| College or more | 10 |
| Monthly household income | |
| Less than 10,000 INR | 39 |
| 10,001–15,000 INR | 43 |
| More than 15,000 INR | 15 |
| Don’t Know | 3 |
| Employed in the last 12 months | |
| Yes | 28 |
| No | 71 |
| Missing | 1 |
| Religion | |
| Hindu | 66 |
| Muslim | 22 |
| Other | 12 |
| Current smoking tobacco use (self-report) | 0 |
| Current smokeless tobacco use (self-report) | 13 |
| Current tobacco use (serum cotininea) | 16 |
| Anemiab | 72 |
| Iron deficiencyc | 44 |
| Iron deficiency anemiad | 41 |
a cotinine≥15 ng/dL
b hemoglobin< 110 g/L
c ferritin< 5 mg/L
d hemoglobin< 110 g/L & ferritin< 15 mg/L
Distribution of antenatal anemia, iron status and other nutritional factors by tobacco use and iron deficiency anemia (n = 100)
| Percent | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tobacco used | Iron deficiency anemiac | Overall | |||
| User | Non-user | Yes | No | ||
| Anemiaa | e88 | 69 | . | . | 72 |
| Iron deficiencyb | **69 | 40 | . | . | 44 |
| Iron deficiency anemiac | **69 | 36 | . | . | 41 |
| Taking iron / folic acid supplements | 33 | 24 | 23 | 27 | 25 |
| Meat / Poultry Consumption | |||||
| None (0) | 13 | 19 | *27 | 12 | 18 |
| Less than median | 50 | 42 | 46 | 52 | 50 |
| More than median | 38 | 39 | 27 | 36 | 32 |
| Green Leafy Vegetable Consumption | |||||
| Less than median | f69 | 48 | 46 | 54 | 65 |
| More than median | 31 | 52 | 54 | 46 | 34 |
| Household Food Insecurity | |||||
| Food secure | 75 | 70 | 71 | 71 | 71 |
| Mildly food insecure | 0 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Moderate or severely food insecure | 25 | 18 | 20 | 19 | 19 |
| Overall Sample |
|
|
|
|
|
a hemoglobin< 110 g/L
b ferritin< 15 mg/L
c hemoglobin< 110 g/L & ferritin< 15 mg/L
d cotinine≥15 ng/dL
e p = 0.13
f p = 0.12
* p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05
Note: Since only one person reported no weekly consumption of green leafy vegetable, she was grouped with the less than median category
Logistic regression of maternal iron deficiency anemiaa (n = 98)
| OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tobacco useb | **14.3 | (2.6, 77.9) |
| Taking iron-folic acid supplements | 0.6 | (0.1, 4.0) |
| Meat Consumption | ||
| None (0) | Referent | – |
| Less than median | **0.3 | (0.1, 0.7) |
| More than median | **0.1 | (0.03, 0.6) |
| Green Leafy Vegetable Consumptionc | ||
| None or less than median | Referent | – |
| More than Median | *0.6 | (0.4, 0.9) |
| Household Food Insecurity | ||
| Food secure | Referent | – |
| Mildly food insecure | 2.3 | (0.4, 11.5) |
| Moderate or severely food insecure | 1.6 | (0.7, 3.8) |
a hemoglobin< 110 g/L & ferritin< 15 mg/L
b cotinine≥15 ng/dL
c There was only one individual in the “None” category, which was therefore combined with “Less than median” category
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.001
Note: Adjusted for age, education, employment, wealth index, religion and parity