| Literature DB >> 29719871 |
Owen Cronin1,2, Wiley Barton1,2,3, Peter Skuse3, Nicholas C Penney4,5, Isabel Garcia-Perez4, Eileen F Murphy6, Trevor Woods7, Helena Nugent2, Aine Fanning1, Silvia Melgar1, Eanna C Falvey2,8, Elaine Holmes4, Paul D Cotter1,3, Orla O'Sullivan1,3, Michael G Molloy1,2, Fergus Shanahan1,2.
Abstract
Many components of modern living exert influence on the resident intestinal microbiota of humans with resultant impact on host health. For example, exercise-associated changes in the diversity, composition, and functional profiles of microbial populations in the gut have been described in cross-sectional studies of habitual athletes. However, this relationship is also affected by changes in diet, such as changes in dietary and supplementary protein consumption, that coincide with exercise. To determine whether increasing physical activity and/or increased protein intake modulates gut microbial composition and function, we prospectively challenged healthy but sedentary adults with a short-term exercise regime, with and without concurrent daily whey protein consumption. Metagenomics- and metabolomics-based assessments demonstrated modest changes in gut microbial composition and function following increases in physical activity. Significant changes in the diversity of the gut virome were evident in participants receiving daily whey protein supplementation. Results indicate that improved body composition with exercise is not dependent on major changes in the diversity of microbial populations in the gut. The diverse microbial characteristics previously observed in long-term habitual athletes may be a later response to exercise and fitness improvement. IMPORTANCE The gut microbiota of humans is a critical component of functional development and subsequent health. It is important to understand the lifestyle and dietary factors that affect the gut microbiome and what impact these factors may have. Animal studies suggest that exercise can directly affect the gut microbiota, and elite athletes demonstrate unique beneficial and diverse gut microbiome characteristics. These characteristics are associated with levels of protein consumption and levels of physical activity. The results of this study show that increasing the fitness levels of physically inactive humans leads to modest but detectable changes in gut microbiota characteristics. For the first time, we show that regular whey protein intake leads to significant alterations to the composition of the gut virome.Entities:
Keywords: bacteriophages; exercise; metabolism; microbial communities; next-generation sequencing; whey protein
Year: 2018 PMID: 29719871 PMCID: PMC5915698 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00044-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1 Study design. The figure presents details of study recruitment and allocation of participants to intervention groups as follows: exercise-only group (E), exercise and protein supplementation group (EP), and whey protein supplementation-only group (P). Reasons for volunteer dropout and completion numbers are also outlined. See also Table S1.
Baseline demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the study participants with comparisons between the 3 intervention groups
| Patient characteristic | Values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise (E) only | Exercise + protein | Protein only | ||
| Age (yrs) | 35 (28, 38) | 32 (28, 35) | 34 (28, 36) | 0.528 |
| No. (%) of females | 0.48 | |||
| Height (cm) | 172 (165, 181) | 169 (166, 183) | 172 (163, 178) | 0.67 |
| Weight (kg) | 78.8 (70.1, 94.5) | 82.3 (69, 98.9) | 76.4 (69.8, 87) | 0.67 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.9 (25.1, 29.2) | 27.5 (25.7, 30) | 27 (24.9, 28.7) | 0.761 |
| Resting heart rate (bpm) | 72 (65, 81) | 68 (61, 79) | 74 (66, 78) | 0.36 |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 128 (117, 134) | 125 (121, 136) | 125 (118, 130) | 0.706 |
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 78 (74, 89) | 76 (72, 84) | 79 (75, 84) | 0.543 |
| Waist/hip ratio | 0.85 (0.83, 0.89) | 0.84 (0.8, 0.93) | 0.83 (0.78, 0.88) | 0.365 |
| Body fat (%) | 32.8 (29, 38.7) | 34.7 (29, 37.2) | 34.5 (29.3, 39.4) | 0.659 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 26.3 (22.6, 30.6) | 26 (23, 33.1) | 26.8 (20.7, 32.9) | 0.96 |
| Fat mass (trunk) (kg) | 14.1 (10.8, 16.8) | 14.1 (11.2, 17.6) | 13.7 (9.4, 17.1) | 0.878 |
| Lean tissue mass (kg) | 52.4 (40.7, 61.4) | 51.3 (41.5, 61.5) | 47.2 (42.9, 53.3) | 0.44 |
| Weekly PA (METS) | 462 (298, 1,139) | 564 (413, 844) | 657 (424, 1,145) | 0.599 |
| Weekly PA (kCal) | 761 (381, 1,618) | 748 (525, 1,127) | 762 (512, 1,773) | 0.767 |
| Sitting time (h per wk) | 56 (40, 61) | 62 (47, 76) | 51 (33, 62) | 0.114 |
| Motorized transport (h per wk) | 5 (3.25, 8.3) | 3.5 (2, 6) | 4.1 (0.8, 7) | 0.27 |
Values represent medians (interquartile ranges) except where otherwise indicated. P values represent results of Kruskal-Wallis tests or chi-square tests. BMI, body mass index; IPAQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaire; METS, metabolic equivalents.
Data indicate chi-square test results.
FIG 2 Alterations in cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition following exercise interventions, protein interventions, and combined interventions. (A) Peak aerobic capacity (VO2max) per kilogram of body weight as predicted using the Rockport 1-mi walk test was higher in both the E and EP groups following the intervention period, indicating improved levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. Within-group comparisons were tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.001). (B) Changes in percentages of body fat following the intervention period as measured using DEXA. Percent body fat reduction was significantly greater in the exercise-only group and in the exercise plus protein supplementation group compared to the protein-only group. (C) Absolute changes in body fat mass (in kilograms) following the intervention period demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in both the exercise and exercise plus protein supplementation groups. (D) Absolute change in lean tissue mass (kg), measured using a three-compartment model, indicating significantly greater lean mass accretion in the E and EP groups than in the P group. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. See also Tables S3 to S5.
FIG 3 Intervention effects on taxonomic and functional pathway diversity of the intestinal microbiome. (A to D) Percent change (Δ) of Shannon α-diversity H-index values following intervention. No significant variations were presented for taxonomic measurements (A to C) or metabolic pathways (D). (E to G) Pairwise statistical assessment of taxonomy α-diversity demonstrates equal data with respect to the presence of taxonomy between groups at baseline. EP1, combined exercise and protein supplementation group, week 0; EP2, combined exercise and protein supplementation group, week 8; E1, exercise-only group, week 0; E2, exercise-only group, week 8; P1, protein-only group, week 0; P2, protein-only group, week 8. (E) The diversity of Archaea was significantly altered after intervention within the P group (P < 0.05) and, similarly, was greater in the P group (P2) than in the EP group (EP2) (P < 0.01). (F) Postintervention bacterial diversity was greater in the EP group (EP2) in testing against the P group (P2) (P < 0.05). (G) Similar levels of virus diversity were presented in the protein supplementation groups (EP and P) following the intervention, with significantly lower diversity in the EP group than in the E group (P < 0.05). (H to O) Principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) of relative abundance profiles for taxonomic and metabolic pathway constructions of the three groups demonstrates the influence of the interventions on the diversity of microbial populations. (H to K) Prior to intervention, group profiles of taxonomic and metabolic pathway diversity were not significantly differentiated. (L to O) Following intervention, a significant separation was identified between the groups for measures of (L) metabolic pathways (P = 0.054), (M) all detected species unsegregated by phylogeny (P < 0.001), (N) bacteria (P < 0.05), and (O) virus species (P < 0.001). Specific separations in diversity per intervention group are outlined further in Fig. 4 for virus species and Fig. S3 for all other comparisons. Statistical assessment of PCoA dissimilarity matrices was performed with the Adonis2 permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) test. (H to O) Density plots were derived from kernel density estimates and scaled to a maximum estimated value of 1 and display concentrations of plotted data along the corresponding plot axis. P values were calculated for α-diversity comparisons using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
FIG 4 Pairwise analysis of detected virus taxonomy prior to and following intervention. (A to C) PCoA of virus species for each group, comparing virus profiles before and after the intervention period (time point 1 [TP1] [week 0] and time point 2 [TP2] [week 8], respectively). (A) The exercise-only group had virus diversity that was not significantly altered by intervention. (B and C) Diversity of viruses was significantly affected during the intervention period for both groups receiving protein supplementation (P < 0.001). The exercise plus protein supplementation group (B) and the protein-only group (C) demonstrated reduced variability of diversity following intervention. Results of pairwise analysis of additional taxonomic and metabolic pathway profiles are presented in Fig. S3. Statistical assessment of PCoA dissimilarity matrices was performed with the Adonis2 PERMANOVA test. (A to C) Density plots were derived from kernel density estimates and scaled to a maximum estimated value of 1 and display concentrations of plotted data along the corresponding plot axis.