| Literature DB >> 29719468 |
Lijuan Chen1,2,3, Ye Yang1,2,3, Jin Ge1,2,3, Xiuming Cui1,2,3, Yin Xiong1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The quality differences in seedlings of medicinal herbs often affect the quality of medicinal parts. The establishment of the grading standard of Panax notoginseng seedlings is significant for the stable quality of medicinal parts of P. notoginseng.Entities:
Keywords: Panax notoginseng; field test; grading standard; seedling
Year: 2017 PMID: 29719468 PMCID: PMC5925621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2017.03.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ginseng Res ISSN: 1226-8453 Impact factor: 6.060
Information on Panax notoginseng seedlings collected from different regions
| No. | Producing area | Number of seedlings (plant) | No. | Producing area | Number of seedlings (plant) | No. | Producing area | Number of seedlings (plant) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xisa Town, Xichou County | 1,200 | 11 | Jiayi Town, Yanshan County | 1,200 | 21 | Dongshan Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 |
| 2 | Xinjie Town, Xichou County | 1,200 | 12 | Pingyuan Town, Yanshan County | 1,200 | 22 | Zhuilijie Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 |
| 3 | Mali Town, Malipo County | 1,200 | 13 | Jiangna Town, Yanshan County | 1,200 | 23 | Gumu Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 |
| 4 | Daping Town, Malipo County | 1,200 | 14 | Baga Town, Yanshan County | 1,200 | 24 | Mabai Town, Maguan County | 1,200 |
| 5 | Mazheng Town, Malipo County | 1,200 | 15 | Dehou Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 | 25 | Nanlao Town, Maguan County | 1,200 |
| 6 | Donggan Town, Malipo County | 1,200 | 16 | Pingba Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 | 26 | Xinhua Town, Funing County | 1,200 |
| 7 | Heizhiguo Town, Guangnan County | 1,200 | 17 | Panzhihua Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 | 27 | Guichao Town, Funing County | 1,200 |
| 8 | Babao Town, Guangnan County | 1,200 | 18 | Kaihua Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 | 28 | Tianpeng Town, Funing County | 1,200 |
| 9 | Nanping Town, Guangnan County | 1,200 | 19 | Xigu Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 | 29 | Jinping Town, Qiubei County | 1,200 |
| 10 | Tanfang Town, Yanshan County | 1,200 | 20 | Matang Town, Wenshan County | 1,200 | 30 | Yuezhe Town, Qiubei County | 1,200 |
Fig. 1Appearance of Panax notoginseng seedlings. (A) Group seedling. (B) Long seedling. 1, 2, 3, and 4 refer to the rhizome, lateral root, root tuber, and fibrous root of P. notoginseng, respectively.
Fig. 2A total of 36,000 P. notoginseng seedlings were collected from 30 producing areas, of which agronomic characters were measured. The normal distribution plots of P. notoginseng seedlings agronomic characters were made by SPSS21.0. (A) Root length. (B) Root diameter. (C) Bud length. (D) Bud diameter. (E) Number of rootlets. (F) Fresh weight.
Statistical result of agronomic characters of Panax notoginseng seedlings
| Index | Root length (cm) | Root diameter (cm) | Bud length (cm) | Bud diameter (cm) | Rootlet number (cm) | Fresh weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effective value ( | 36,000 | 36,000 | 36,000 | 36,000 | 36,000 | 36,000 |
| Maximum | 6.3 | 1.99 | 2.9 | 0.767 | 32 | 5.94 |
| Minimum | 0.8 | 0.410 | 0.1 | 0.201 | 1 | 0.34 |
| Average value | 2.6 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 0.506 | 10 | 1.83 |
| Standard deviation | 0.64 | 0.42 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 4 | 0.76 |
| Coefficient of variation (%) | 25.7 | 39.8 | 14.3 | 38.7 | 44.3 | 41.2 |
Correlation analysis of Panax notoginseng seedlings indices (N = 36,000)
| Index | Fresh weight | Root length | Root diameter | Bud length | Bud diameter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root length | 0.759** | ||||
| Root diameter | 0.994** | −0.434** | |||
| Bud length | 0.107* | 0.072 | 0.057* | ||
| Bud diameter | 0.508** | 0.190* | 0.441** | 0.057 | |
| Rootlet number | 0.106* | 0.073* | 0.084* | 0.055* | 0.067* |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Final clustering center values of Panax notoginseng seedlings by K-means clustering analysis
| Index | Final cluster center | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |
| Fresh weight of per plant (g) | 1.59 | 2.68 | 0.95 | 0.62 |
| Root length (cm) | 2.6 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 2.2 |
| Root diameter (cm) | 1.37 | 1.08 | 0.858 | 0.654 |
| Bud diameter (cm) | 0.504 | 0.629 | 0.332 | 0.236 |
| Rootlet number | 15 | 25 | 8 | 4 |
| No. of clusters (N) | 18,107 | 3,889 | 11,665 | 2,339 |
| Percentage (%) | 50.3 | 10.8 | 32.4 | 6.5 |
Distances among the final cluster centers of four categories
| Index | Distance among final cluster centers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | |
| First | 5.252 | 3.904 | 8.352 | |
| Second | 5.252 | 7.845 | 9.908 | |
| Third | 3.904 | 7.845 | 4.214 | |
| Fourth | 8.352 | 9.908 | 4.214 | |
Preliminary grading standard of Panax notoginseng seedlings
| Grade | Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh weight (g) | Root length (cm) | Root diameter (cm) | Bud diameter (cm) | Rootlet number | |
| Special | ≥2.68 | ≥4.3 | 1.08–1.29 | ≥0.629 | ≥25 |
| Premium | 1.59–2.68 | 2.6–4.3 | 1.08–1.37 | 0.504–0.629 | 15–25 |
| Standard | 0.95–1.59 | 1.9–2.6 | 0.858–1.08 | 0.332–0.504 | 8–15 |
| Culled | ≤0.95 | ≤1.9 | ≤0.858 | ≤0.332 | ≤8 |
Fig. 3Emergence rates of different grades of Panax notoginseng seedlings after transplantation of 60 days. The orthogonal design of L9 (34) was used in the plots. Twelve plots randomly permuted were set up. The graph shows the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments.*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, compared with the special grade; Δ p < 0.05 and ΔΔ p < 0.01, compared with the premium grade.
Agronomic characters of different grades of Panax notoginseng seedlings at different growth stages
| Time (d) | Grade | Plant height (cm) | Stem height (cm) | Stem diameter (cm) | Root length (cm) | Root diameter (cm) | Mid-leaf length (cm) | Mid-leaf width (cm) | Number of rootlets | Chlorophyll content (SPAD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | Special | 20.9 ± 2.04 | 11.7 ± 1.19 | 0.372 ± 0.12 | 3.8 ± 1.19 | 1.19 ± 0.21 | 6.5 ± 1.53 | 2.3 ± 0.46 | 19 ± 3 | 29.9 ± 1.89 |
| Premium | 20 ± 2.16 | 10.5 ± 1.16 | 0.359 ± 0.12 | 3.6 ± 1.03 | 1.13 ± 0.23 | 5.8 ± 1.41 | 2.2 ± 1.06 | 13 ± 3 | 28.7 ± 1.06 | |
| Standard | 18.3 ± 2.35 | 9.1 ± 1.28 | 0.323 ± 0.12 | 3.1 ± 1.72 | 1.01 ± 0.51 | 4.9 ± 1.66 | 2.1 ± 0.59 | 12 ± 3 | 26.8 ± 2.08 | |
| 150 | Special | 24.8 ± 1.91 | 17.6 ± 2.08 | 0.406 ± 0.05 | 6.9 ± 0.67 | 1.65 ± 0.11 | 9.6 ± 0.52 | 3.5 ± 0.54 | 33 ± 4 | 41.8 ± 1.26 |
| Premium | 22.9 ± 2.23 | 15.9 ± 4.30 | 0.389 ± 0.03 | 6.0 ± 0.48 | 1.31 ± 0.15 | 8.3 ± 0.50 | 3.0 ± 0.23 | 23 ± 4 | 37.5 ± 1.32 | |
| Standard | 19.7 ± 2.29 | 12.6 ± 1.94 | 0.366 ± 0.02 | 5.1 ± 1.53 | 1.27 ± 0.09 | 6.4 ± 1.01 | 2.5 ± 0.23 | 17 ± 2 | 31.7 ± 1.09 | |
| 240 | Special | 26.3 ± 2.11 | 20.9 ± 2.02 | 0.449 ± 0.42 | 7.1 ± 0.81 | 1.74 ± 0.25 | 10.7 ± 0.45 | 4.1 ± 0.41 | 35 ± 5 | 59.4 ± 3.12 |
| Premium | 24.1 ± 1.23 | 17.9 ± 1.52 | 0.408 ± 0.22 | 6.3 ± 0.46 | 1.45 ± 0.17 | 9.1 ± 0.39 | 3.5 ± 0.32 | 27 ± 4 | 48.8 ± 2.78 | |
| Standard | 20.9 ± 1.09 | 13.8 ± 1.26 | 0.379 ± 0.12 | 5.6 ± 0.61 | 1.31 ± 0.19 | 6.9 ± 0.52 | 2.9 ± 0.35 | 19 ± 3 | 37.8 ± 1.95 |
SPAD, Soil and Plant Analyzer Development
Fig. 4Fresh weight/dry weight (FW/DW) ratios of Panax notoginseng seedlings of different grades at different growth stages. (A) Root, stem, and leaf. (B) Total biomass. Each graph shows the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, compared with the special grade; Δ p < 0.05 and ΔΔ p < 0.01, compared with the premium grade.
Photosynthesis indices of Panax notoginseng seedlings in different grades and growth stages
| Time (d) | Grade | Net photosynthetic rate [μmol/(m2 s)] | Transpiration rate [mmol/(m2 s)] | Stomatal conductance [mmol/(m2 s)] | Intercellular CO2 concentration (μL/L) | Water use efficiency in leaf |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | Special | 3.265 ± 2.02 | 0.286 ± 0.35 | 13.06 ± 2.41 | 235.6 ± 9.33 | 11.42 ± 1.07 |
| Premium | 2.243 ± 1.06 | 0.266 ± 0.32 | 12.98 ± 2.83 | 277.1 ± 10.8 | 8.43 ± 1.43 | |
| Standard | 1.996 ± 0.90 | 0.234 ± 0.29 | 12.78 ± 0.99 | 304.9 ± 13.19 | 8.52 ± 1.10 | |
| 150 | Special | 5.941 ± 2.06 | 0.479 ± 0.39 | 19.74 ± 2.05 | 207.8 ± 8.12 | 12.41 ± 1.12 |
| Premium | 3.892 ± 0.93 | 0.409 ± 0.18 | 19.32 ± 2.51 | 256.5 ± 12.8 | 9.52 ± 1.37 | |
| Standard | 2.269 ± 1.11 | 0.291 ± 0.11 | 18.98 ± 1.77 | 296.8 ± 13.86 | 7.79 ± 1.56 | |
| 240 | Special | 6.911 ± 0.52 | 0.527 ± 0.06 | 19.71 ± 1.93 | 185.9 ± 11.08 | 13.11 ± 1.81 |
| Premium | 4.227 ± 0.33 | 0.423 ± 0.13 | 18.82 ± 1.75 | 228.4 ± 15.90 | 9.99 ± 1.53 | |
| Standard | 2.655 ± 0.36 | 0.332 ± 0.03 | 18.57 ± 1.49 | 267.8 ± 18.56 | 8.01 ± 1.03 |
Fig. 5The yields, size, and roots number per 500 g of Notoginseng Radix samples from Panax notoginseng seedlings of different grades collected from different plots in late April 2016. (A) Yields. (B) Size. (C) Number of roots per 500 g. Each graph shows the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, compared with the special grade; Δ p < 0.05 and ΔΔ p < 0.01, compared with the premium grade.
Fig. 6Content of total saponins and contents of saponins of Notoginseng Radix samples from P. notoginseng seedlings of different grades planted for 2 years. (A) Total saponins. (B) Contents of saponins. Each graph shows the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, compared with the special grade; Δ p < 0.05 and ΔΔ p < 0.01, compared with the premium grade.