Literature DB >> 29719321

Saudi Oncology Society and Saudi Urology Association combined clinical management guidelines for renal cell carcinoma 2017.

Abdullah Alsharm1, Shouki Bazarbashi2, Abdullah Alghamdi3, Sultan Alkhateeb4, Ali Aljubran2, Ashraf Abusamra5, Hulayel Alharbi6, Mohammed Alotaibi7, Mubarak Almansour8, Hussein Alkushi9, Imran Ahmed10, Esam Murshid11, Amin Eltijani12, Danny Rabah13.   

Abstract

In this report, we update the previously published Saudi guidelines for the evaluation and medical and surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. It is categorized according to the stage of the disease using the tumor node metastasis staging system 7th edition. The recommendations are presented with supporting evidence level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidelines; Saudi Oncology Society; Saudi Urological Association; management; renal cell carcinoma

Year:  2018        PMID: 29719321      PMCID: PMC5907318          DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_175_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Ann        ISSN: 0974-7796


INTRODUCTION

Renal cancer represents the 10th most common cancer type in males (13th most common cancer type in females) in the Saudi Arabian population. There were 313 cases of renal cancer in 2013, accounting for 2.7% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases. In 2013, the male-to-female ratio for this cancer was 1.6:1, and the age-standardized rate was 2.9/100,000 for males and 1.7/100,000 for females. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years among males and 49 years among females.[1] All cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) should preferably be seen or discussed in a multidisciplinary forum.

PRETREATMENT EVALUATION

Evaluation of suspicious renal mass

History and physical examination Blood count, renal, and hepatic profiles Computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis Urine analysis Urine cytology should be done if urothelial cancer is suspected Indications of renal mass biopsy include as follows: suspicion of renal abscess, suspicion of metastases, suspicion of renal lymphoma, and before systemic therapy. Furthermore, biopsy is strongly advocated before nonsurgical options (i.e., active surveillance, cryo [cryoablation], and radiofrequency ablation) Brain imaging and bone scan should be done only if clinically indicated.

STAGING

The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging definitions for RCC should be adopted[2] [Tables 1 and 2].
Table 1

Tumor, node, and metastasis staging for renal cell carcinoma

Table 2

Renal cell carcinoma anatomical stages and prognostic groups

Tumor, node, and metastasis staging for renal cell carcinoma Renal cell carcinoma anatomical stages and prognostic groups

PATHOLOGY

The recommended pathology report adopts the College of the American Pathologists 2016 Guidelines [Appendix 1]. Sample pathology report Click here for additional data file.

TREATMENT

Localized disease (T1a)

The recommended treatment is surgical excision, preferably by partial nephrectomy (PN) (open, laparoscopic, or robotic), in all cases, especially in patients with solitary kidney, bilateral tumors, familial renal cell cancer, or renal insufficiency (EL-1) [Figure 1][3456789]
Figure 1

Renal cell carcinoma management diagram

Radical nephrectomy (RN) (preferably laparoscopic) should be reserved for cases where PN is not technically feasible after consultation with an experienced surgeon (EL-1)[345678910111213141516] Nonsurgical options (i.e., active surveillance, cryoablation, and radiofrequency ablation) are all inferior to surgical excision in terms of oncological outcome and are not recommended, except in patients with significant comorbidities that interdict surgical intervention (EL-2).[1718192021] Renal cell carcinoma management diagram

Localized disease (T1b)

The recommended treatment is RN (preferably laparoscopic) (EL-1)[10111213141516222324252627] PN may be an option, especially in patients with a solitary kidney, bilateral tumors, familial renal cell cancer, or renal insufficiency. However, this should only be performed by an experienced surgeon in a high-volume center (EL-1)[2223242526272829] Nonsurgical options (i.e., active surveillance, cryoablation, and radiofrequency ablation) are not recommended.

Localized disease (T2)

The recommended treatment is RN (EL-1)[10111213141516222324252627] PN and nonsurgical options (i.e., active surveillance, cryoablation, and radiofrequency ablation) are not recommended.

Localized disease (T3)

The recommended treatment is RN with complete excision of all venous thrombus in the renal vein, inferior vena cava, and right atrium (EL-2)[2829] These surgeries should only be performed in a tertiary care centers with the availability of a cardiac, vascular, or hepatic surgeon, depending on the case (EL-2).[2829]

Excision of the ipsilateral adrenal gland

Ipsilateral excision of the adrenal gland during RN is indicated in upper pole kidney tumors or the presence of a concurrent radiologically detectable adrenal gland lesion(s) (EL-2).[30313233]

Lymph node dissection

Resection of the regional lymph nodes (within Gerota's fascia) is an integral part of RN Resection of the nonregional lymph nodes provides no therapeutic advantages but is used for staging purposes (EL-1).[34] When doing PN, the surgeon should aim to obtain adequate surgical margin and avoid tumor inoculation, except in patients with von Hippel–Lindau syndrome.[353637] For postoperative follow-up after treatment, use the European Association of Urology Guidelines [Table 3].
Table 3

Surveillance guidelines following surgery for renal cell cancer, adapted from the European Association of Urology

Surveillance guidelines following surgery for renal cell cancer, adapted from the European Association of Urology

Metastatic advanced, unresectable disease

For risk stratification of metastatic RCC, there are two valid options [Appendix 2] The Memorial Sloan Kettering cancer center (MSKCC/Motzer) risk classification for metastatic disease[38] Heng Score for Metastatic RCC Prognosis.[39] Potentially resectable primary tumors with solitary metastasis or multiple resectable lung metastases: these patients should undergo primary nephrectomy and resection of the metastatic lesion/s (EL-2). Following complete resection, no further therapy or “adjuvant therapy” is indicated (EL-3) Potentially resectable primary and multiple nonresectable metastasis: those patients should undergo resection of the primary tumor if in good performance status (EL-1),[4041] then start systemic therapy according to the following guidelines: Clear cell histology with good or intermediate risk: options of therapy include systemic therapy with either sunitinib (EL-1),[42] bevacizumab and interferon α-2a, or pazopanib (EL-1).[4434445] High-dose interleukin -2 may be used in highly selected patients and centers[46] Clear cell histology with poor risk: temsirolimus is the preferred treatment (EL-1).[1847] An alternative option is sunitinib (EL-2) Nonclear cell histology: options of therapy include temsirolimus (EL-2),[47] sunitinib (EL-2),[48] or sorafenib (EL-2).[49] Medullary and collecting duct carcinomas should be treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (EL-3)[50] Unresectable primary tumor with or without metastatic disease: These patients with good performance status should be offered systemic therapy according to their histological results and MSKCC risk group as in Item 4.9.3 Recurrent disease postprimary nephrectomy: treatment will depend if resectable or not: If resectable solitary metastasis: surgical resection should be attempted (EL-2).[515253] No systemic therapy is of benefit following complete resection (EL-3) If nonresectable recurrence: patient should be treated as metastatic disease according to their histological results, using MSKCC Risk Score and/or Heng Score as in Item 4.9.3. Second-line therapy posttyrosine tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure: patients who fail with first-line TKIs should receive second-line therapy if in reasonable performance status. Options of second-line agents include: nivolumab (EL-1),[54] cabozantinib (EL-1),[55] or axitinib (EL-1).[56] In the absence of these options, everolimus can be considered[5758] Third-line therapy: consider everolimus (Level 3), sorafenib (Level 3), or clinical trials [Figure 1]. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma prognostic models Click here for additional data file.

Financial support and sponsorship

Funding was provided by the Saudi Oncology Society for this work.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  55 in total

1.  Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer.

Authors:  R C Flanigan; S E Salmon; B A Blumenstein; S I Bearman; V Roy; P C McGrath; J R Caton; N Munshi; E D Crawford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Toni K Choueiri; Bernard Escudier; Thomas Powles; Paul N Mainwaring; Brian I Rini; Frede Donskov; Hans Hammers; Thomas E Hutson; Jae-Lyun Lee; Katriina Peltola; Bruce J Roth; Georg A Bjarnason; Lajos Géczi; Bhumsuk Keam; Pablo Maroto; Daniel Y C Heng; Manuela Schmidinger; Philip W Kantoff; Anne Borgman-Hagey; Colin Hessel; Christian Scheffold; Gisela M Schwab; Nizar M Tannir; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses.

Authors:  Rebecca L O'Malley; Aaron D Berger; Jamie A Kanofsky; Courtney K Phillips; Michael Stifelman; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Incidentally discovered renal masses: oncological and perioperative outcomes in patients with delayed surgical intervention.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Thomas J Guzzo; Thomas W Jarrett; Louis R Kavoussi; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: oncological outcomes at 10 years or more.

Authors:  Andre Berger; Ricardo Brandina; Mohamed A Atalla; Amin S Herati; Kazumi Kamoi; Monish Aron; Georges-Pascal Haber; Robert J Stein; Mihir M Desai; Louis R Kavoussi; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jun-Hang Luo; Fang-Jian Zhou; Dan Xie; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Bing Liao; Hong-Wei Zhao; Yu-Ping Dai; Ling-Wu Chen; Wei Chen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Active surveillance of renal masses in elderly patients.

Authors:  Robert Abouassaly; Brian R Lane; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Saja H Almazrou; Layan A Alsubki; Norah A Alsaigh; Wadha H Aldhubaib; Sharifah M Ghazwani
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-02-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.