Literature DB >> 29718779

English language YouTube videos as a source of lead poisoning-related information: a cross-sectional study.

Corey H Basch1, Ashley M Jackson2, Jingjing Yin3, Rodney N Hammond1, Atin Adhikari2, Isaac Chun-Hai Fung2.   

Abstract

Exposure to lead is detrimental to children's development. YouTube is a form of social media through which people may learn about lead poisoning. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyze the variation in lead poisoning-related YouTube contents between different video sources. The 100 most viewed lead poisoning-related videos were manually coded, among which, 50 were consumer-generated, 19 were created by health care professionals, and 31 were news. The 100 videos had a total of more than 8.9 million views, with news videos accounting for 63% of those views. The odds of mentioning what lead poisoning is, how to remove lead, and specifically mentioning the danger in ages 1-5 because of rapid growth among videos created by health care professionals were 7.28 times (Odds ratio, OR = 7.28, 95% CI, 2.09, 25.37, p = 0.002); 6.83 times (OR = 6.83, 95% CI, 2.05, 22.75, p = 0.002) and 9.14 times (OR = 9.14, CI, 2.05, 40.70, p = 0.004) that of consumer-generated videos, respectively. In this study, professional videos had more accurate information regarding lead but their videos were less likely to be viewed compared to consumer-generated videos and news videos. If professional videos about lead poisoning can attract more viewers, more people would be better informed and could possibly influence policy agendas, thereby helping communities being affected by lead exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Content analysis; YouTube; lead poisoning; manual coding; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29718779      PMCID: PMC6060871          DOI: 10.1080/10773525.2018.1467621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 1077-3525


  5 in total

1.  YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Keelan; Vera Pavri-Garcia; George Tomlinson; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk?

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  YouTube as a source of health information: Analysis of sun protection and skin cancer prevention related issues.

Authors:  Linda Ruppert; Brian Køster; Anna Maria Siegert; Christian Cop; Lindsay Boyers; Chante Karimkhani; Helena Winston; Jessica Mounessa; Robert P Dellavalle; Daphne Reinau; Thomas Diepgen; Christian Surber
Journal:  Dermatol Online J       Date:  2017-01-15

Review 4.  Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kapil Chalil Madathil; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Joel S Greenstein; Anand K Gramopadhye
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Zika Virus on YouTube: An Analysis of English-language Video Content by Source.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Rodney N Hammond; Elizabeth B Blankenship; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; King-Wa Fu; Patrick Ip; Charles E Basch
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2017-01-26
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Adopting YouTube to Promote Health: Analysis of State Health Departments.

Authors:  Carmen H Duke; Jingjing Yin; Xinyan Zhang; Elizabeth B Blankenship; Sewuese E Akuse; Gulzar H Shah; Chung-Hong Chan; King-Wa Fu; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.