| Literature DB >> 29718487 |
Fulian Wang1, Consolatha Chambi1,2, Zaiyuan Li1, Cong Huang1, Yuekun Ma1, Chuanren Li1, Xiaohai Tian3, Frank Sangija4, Mbuya Sylvain Ntambo5, Onesime M Kankonda6, Sumaira Hafeez3, Toheed Anwar3, Rahat Sharif7.
Abstract
Bactrocera minax (Enderlein) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major citrus pest in China, whose artificial rearing technology of the adult is not well documented to date. In this study, we tried to determine if supplementing proteins to the adult diet could result in the enhancement of some fitness parameters of B. minax. Four feeds with varying protein source were provided as F0 (water), F1 (sucrose), F2 (sucrose + yeast), and F3 (sucrose + peptone). F0 and F1 being the control, F2 and F3 were protein food types. The results showed that adults fed by F2 and F3 lived longer with 40.1 d and 32.8 d, respectively, had reduced death rates (death peaks were delayed for 5.6 d and 4.1 d, respectively), increased mating frequencies (8.1 and 5.3 per females, 4.7 and 7.3 per males, respectively), and longer mating durations (with 42 d and 34 d). In addition, females recorded an increased adult ovary development, more egg load (with 94.8 and 77.3 brood eggs per ovary) and to greater oviposition rates of 63.2 eggs/female and 19.3 eggs/female. Based on our results, protein supplements enhanced B. minax survival, mating, and fecundity. This study does not only provide basic knowledge to implement artificial rearing of B. minax, but also deepens our understanding on its physiology that could be used to enhance the management of the pest.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29718487 PMCID: PMC5842393 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iey008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.Grading of the ovarian in female adult of B. minax. Stages of ovarian development in adult B. minax, Stages 1–2 represent sexually immature females, and refer to steps in the ovary maturation phase. Stage 3 represents mature ovaries, before and after the onset of oviposition. (a) means ovarian stage 1, (b) means ovarian stage 2, (c) means ovarian stage 3.
Life expectancy, mating frequency, ovarian egg load, and female egg production data for B. minax maintained at different food sources (protein diet and non-protein diets)
| Food sources | Life expectancy | Mating frequency | Ovarian egg load | Female oviposition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ♀ | ♂ | ||||
| F0 | 5.7 ± 0.1d | 0.0 ± 0.0b | 0.0 ± 0.0b | 0.0 ± 0.0b | 0.0 ± 0.0c |
| F1 | 19.6 ± 0.1c | 0.38 ± 0.2b | 0.31 ± 0.1b | 15.0 ± 7.6b | 0.0 ± 0.0c |
| F2 | 40.1 ± 1.8a | 8.07 ± 0.3a | 4.69 ± 0.4a | 94.79 ± 6.3a | 63.2 ± 8.7a |
| F3 | 32.8 ± 2.7b | 5.31 ± 1.5a | 7.3 ± 1.9a | 77.29 ± 7.0a | 19.3 ± 2.5b |
The mean ± standard deviation (life expectancy, mating frequency/male or female, number of eggs/ovary, and egg production per female) are represented. F0–Diet containing Water alone; F1–Diet containing Sucrose alone; F2–Diet containing Sucrose and Yeast; F3–Diet containing Sucrose and Peptone. Different letters between food types are statistically different after Tukey’s test at P = 0.05.
Age-specific cumulative mortality ratio
| Food sources | Age-specific cumulative mortality ratio (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 d | 10 d | 30 d | 50 d | 65 d | 75 d | |
| F0 | 37.0 ± 4.1a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a |
| F1 | 36.3 ± 12.3a | 66.0 ± 8.3b | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a |
| F2 | 23.3 ± 2.1a | 49.7 ± 0.6b | 77.0 ± 3.1b | 87.7 ± 2.3b | 98.7 ± 0.6b | 100.0 ± 0.0a |
| F3 | 25.3 ± 0.6a | 49.3 ± 1.5b | 82.7 ± 4.4b | 96.7 ± 2.1a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a |
Arcsine transformation (arcsine square root transformation used to transform cumulative mortality data and then one-way ANOVA, means were separated by Tukey’s test at P = 0.05. Different letters between food types are statistically different after Tukey’s test at P = 0.05.
Fig. 2.Effect of different food types on cumulative mortality of adult B. minax.
Curve equation for regression between cumulative mortality and feeding days of B. minax adults fed with different food types
| Food types | Regression equation |
|
|
| Feeding days | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT50 | LT90 | |||||
| F0 | Y = 102.057/(1 + Exp(4.665 − 0.869X)) | 1.000 | 0.666 | 0.798 | 5.3 | 7.7 |
| F1 | Y = 99.255/(1 + Exp(2.817 − 0.315X)) | 0.994 | 0.388 | 0.496 | 9.0 | 16.2 |
| F2 | Y = 93.472/(1 + Exp(1.364 − 0.103X)) | 0.967 | 0.413 | 0.526 | 14.6 | 44.9 |
| F3 | Y = 96.843/(1 + Exp(1.612 − 0.128X)) | 0.982 | 0.707 | 0.834 | 13.1 | 32.7 |
Y: represents the cumulative mortality of B. minax; X: feeding days (days of food supply to the flies, until death of the last fly) of B. minax; LT50: (Lethal Time) is the time required to record 50% adult mortality. LT90: the maximum lethal time required to record 90% adult mortality; R: coefficient of determination; R0.05: coefficient of determination at 95%, R0.01: coefficient of determination at 99%. (If R-value is greater than 0.05 and 0.01 are statistically significant and R-value less than 0.05 and 0.01 are not statistically significant). The adult cumulative mortality was transformed to probability units and analyzed using the logistic regression (y = a/(1 + Exp (b − k x))) where x is the feed days in each food and y is the cumulative mortality in probability units. Time–mortality data was fitted using probability analysis to estimate the lethal time for 50% (LT 50) and 90% (LT 90) cumulative mortality in each food treatment tested.
Fig. 3.Cumulative mating of adult B. minax fed on different food sources (50% represent adult mating peaks).
Age-specific cumulative mating ratio
| Food sources | Age-specific cumulative mating ratio (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 d | 15 d | 18 d | 30 d | 42 d | 51 d | |
| F0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| F1 | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 43.3 ± 23.3a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a |
| F2 | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 7.1 ± 1.7a | 21.4 ± 4.8b | 88.5 ± 4.8b | 95.1 ± 1.4b | 100.0 ± 0.0a |
| F3 | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 14.0 ± 2.7a | 34.4 ± 7.7b | 74.1 ± 7.9a | 100.0 ± 0.0a | 100.0 ± 0.0a |
Arcsine transformation (arcsine square root transformation used to transform mating frequency data and then one-way ANOVA, means were separated by Tukey’s test at P = 0.05. Different letters between food types are statistically different after Tukey’s test at P = 0.05.
Curve equation from regression analysis between cumulative mating ratio and feeding days for B. minax adults fed on different food sources
| Food types | Regression equation |
|
|
| Feeding days | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mating onset (16%) | Mating peak (50%) | Mating end (84%) | |||||
| F0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| F1 | Y = 106.933/(1 + Exp(16.30 − 1.087X)) | 0.972 | 0.775 | 0.875 | 13.4 | 14.9 | 16.2 |
| F2 | Y = 97.131/(1 + Exp(5.425 − 0.223X)) | 0.997 | 0.304 | 0.393 | 17.1 | 24.6 | 32.7 |
| F3 | Y = 99.740/(1 + Exp(5.407 − 0.249X)) | 0.994 | 0.339 | 0.436 | 15.1 | 21.8 | 28.4 |
Y: represents the cumulative mating ratio of B. minax; X: represents the feeding time (days of food supply to the flies, until death of the last fly) of B. minax; —: represent unmated; R: coefficient of determination; R0.05: coefficient of determination at 95%, R0.01: coefficient of determination at 99%. (If R-value is Greater than 0.05 and 0.01 are statistically significant and R-value Less than 0.05 and 0.01 are not statistically significant). The adult cumulative mating ratio in four food sources (F0, F1, F2, F3) tested was transformed to probability units and analyzed using the logistic regression (y = a/(1 + Exp (b − k x))) where x is the feeding days in each food, y is the cumulative mating ratio of B. minax in probability units. Mating time data were fitted using probability analysis to estimate the time for 16% (mating onset), 50% (mating peaks), and 84% (mating ends) cumulative mating in each food treatment tested.
Fig. 4.Ovarian development for female B. minax flies fed with different food types. d: indicates feeding days when food was supplied to the flies.