Literature DB >> 29718357

Examining Risk Perceptions Among Daily Smokers Naïve to Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes.

Melissa Mercincavage1, Kirsten Lochbuehler1, Andrea C Villanti2, E Paul Wileyto1, Janet Audrain-McGovern1, Andrew A Strasser1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated its interest in reducing the addictiveness of combustible cigarettes by lowering their nicotine content. Delineating risk perceptions of reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes prior to federal regulation may inform the content of future educational campaigns accompanying this policy.
METHODS: Five hundred non-treatment-seeking, daily smokers naïve to RNC cigarettes (63.0% male, 51.6% nonWhite, mean [SD] cigarettes per day = 15.69 [7.58], age = 43.44 [11.46]) completed a 10-item RNC cigarette risk perception questionnaire at baseline in two, unrelated experimental studies. We used multinomial logistic regression models to identify demographic (eg, gender) and smoking-related (eg, nicotine dependence) correlates of RNC cigarette risk perceptions.
RESULTS: Although the majority of participants did not misperceive RNC cigarettes as less harmful than regular or high nicotine cigarettes, a large portion of the sample held misperceptions about RNC cigarettes' addictiveness (56.4%) and cessation aid potential (63.4%). More than 20% of the sample reported being unsure about RNC-related risks, especially tar content (51.8%). NonWhite smokers were 2.5 to 3 times more likely to be incorrect about multiple RNC cigarette risks (p = .002-.006).
CONCLUSIONS: If the FDA mandates a reduced nicotine content standard for cigarettes, educational campaigns will be needed to correct misperceptions about RNC cigarettes' addictiveness and potential to aid cessation as well as inform consumers about their safety risks. Campaigns tailored toward nonWhite smokers may also be needed to correct misperceptions of RNC cigarette risks held by this subgroup. IMPLICATIONS: The FDA has stated its interest in reducing cigarettes' addictiveness by lowering their nicotine content, enabling smokers to quit. Our findings suggest that most smokers who have not used RNC cigarettes do not perceive these products as less addictive or as cessation tools, stressing a need for future educational campaigns to correct these misperceptions. Campaigns are also needed to educate uninformed smokers about RNC cigarettes and should consider targeting messages toward subgroups likely to hold misperceptions about the risks and benefits of using these products (eg, nonWhite smokers).
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29718357      PMCID: PMC6588387          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  17 in total

1.  Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Rachel L Denlinger; Jennifer W Tidey; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Neal L Benowitz; Ryan G Vandrey; Mustafa al'Absi; Steven G Carmella; Paul M Cinciripini; Sarah S Dermody; David J Drobes; Stephen S Hecht; Joni Jensen; Tonya Lane; Chap T Le; F Joseph McClernon; Ivan D Montoya; Sharon E Murphy; Jason D Robinson; Maxine L Stitzer; Andrew A Strasser; Hilary Tindle; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Reduced nicotine cigarettes: smoking behavior and biomarkers of exposure among smokers not intending to quit.

Authors:  David Hammond; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Public misperception that very low nicotine cigarettes are less carcinogenic.

Authors:  M Justin Byron; Michelle Jeong; David B Abrams; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; J E Henningfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Compensatory smoking from gradual and immediate reduction in cigarette nicotine content.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Eric C Donny; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Smoking behavior and exposure to tobacco toxicants during 6 months of smoking progressively reduced nicotine content cigarettes.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Katherine M Dains; Sharon M Hall; Susan Stewart; Margaret Wilson; Delia Dempsey; Peyton Jacob
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors:  J E Henningfield; N L Benowitz; J Slade; T P Houston; R M Davis; S D Deitchman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Progressively Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes on Smoking Behaviors, Biomarkers of Exposure, and Subjective Ratings.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Kathy Z Tang; Rachel L Dumont; E Paul Wileyto; Steven G Carmella; Stephen S Hecht; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

10.  Nicotine and carcinogen exposure with smoking of progressively reduced nicotine content cigarette.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Sharon M Hall; Susan Stewart; Margaret Wilson; Delia Dempsey; Peyton Jacob
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of advertising features on smokers' and non-smokers' perceptions of a reduced nicotine cigarette modified risk tobacco product.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Lauren R Pacek; James Thrasher; Joseph N Cappella; Cristine Delnevo; Eric C Donny; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.953

Review 2.  A review of the evidence on cigarettes with reduced addictiveness potential.

Authors:  Eric C Donny; Cassidy M White
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2021-09-15

3.  Addicted to smoking or addicted to nicotine? A focus group study on perceptions of nicotine and addiction among US adult current smokers, former smokers, non-smokers and dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Emily E Loud; Hue Trong Duong; Katherine C Henderson; Reed M Reynolds; David L Ashley; James F Thrasher; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Regulatory Approaches and Implementation of Minimally Addictive Combusted Products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Dongqun Xu; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.825

5.  Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes: Literature Review and Gap Analysis.

Authors:  Micah L Berman; Allison M Glasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Reducing Nicotine Without Misleading the Public: Descriptions of Cigarette Nicotine Level and Accuracy of Perceptions About Nicotine Content, Addictiveness, and Risk.

Authors:  M Justin Byron; Marissa G Hall; Jessica L King; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Darren Mays; Andrea C Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Kathryn Rehberg; Lilianna Phan; Melissa Mercincavage; George Luta; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Misperceptions of Nicotine and Nicotine Reduction: The Importance of Public Education to Maximize the Benefits of a Nicotine Reduction Standard.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; M Justin Byron; Melissa Mercincavage; Lauren R Pacek
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.