Literature DB >> 29718235

Outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery.

Christopher P Young1, Shubhra Sinha2, Hunaid A Vohra2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement has been used for more than 20 years, but its uptake has been limited. The volumes have increased steadily over the last 10 years, but it is still not regarded as a mainstream procedure. The issue, to some extent, is due to the lack of perceived evidence that minimal access incisions confer any benefit other than cosmetic appearance. In this article, the current literature on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is reviewed, and it is concluded that benefits are demonstrable, particularly in higher risk, comorbid settings.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29718235     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  3 in total

1.  Stonehenge technique is associated with faster aortic clamp time in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy.

Authors:  Masataka Yamazaki; Akihiro Yoshitake; Tatsuo Takahashi; Tsutomu Ito; Naritaka Kimura; Akinori Hirano; Yasunori Iida; Shuichiro Takanashi; Hideyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08-16

2.  Minimally invasive and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement: a comparative early operative outcomes.

Authors:  Issaka Zallé; Moussa Son; Mohamed El-Alaoui; Macédoine Nijimbéré; Drissi Boumzebra
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-09-30

3.  Subtle is the sutureless, but malicious it is not.

Authors:  Hazem Mamdooh; Theodor Fischlein; Francesco Pollari
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-06-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.