Anne F Rositch1, Shuai Jiang1, Anna E Coghill2, Gita Suneja3, Eric A Engels2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore. 2. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies suggest that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected cancer patients are less likely to receive cancer treatment. The extent to which this disparity affects the growing population of elderly individuals is unknown and factors that mediate these treatment differences have not been explored. Methods: We studied 930359 Americans aged 66-99 years who were diagnosed with 10 common cancers. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare claims from 1991 to 2011 were used to determine HIV status and receipt of cancer treatment in 6 months following diagnosis. Mediation analysis was conducted to estimate the direct effect of HIV, and indirect effect through cancer stage at diagnosis and comorbidities, on cancer treatment. Results: HIV-infected individuals (n = 687) were less likely to receive cancer treatment (70% vs 75% HIV uninfected; P < .01). This difference was larger in individuals aged 66-70 years, among whom only 65% were treated (vs 81% in HIV uninfected; P < .01), and time from cancer diagnosis to treatment was longer (median, 42.5 vs 36 days in HIV uninfected; P < .01). Accounting for potential confounders, HIV-infected individuals aged 66-70 years remained 20% less likely to receive cancer treatment (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% confidence interval, .71-.92]). Seventy-five percent of this total effect was due to HIV itself, with a nonsignificant 24% mediated by cancer stage and comorbidities. Conclusions: Lowest cancer treatment rates were seen in the younger subset of HIV-infected individuals, who would likely benefit most from treatment in terms of life expectancy.
Background: Previous studies suggest that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected cancerpatients are less likely to receive cancer treatment. The extent to which this disparity affects the growing population of elderly individuals is unknown and factors that mediate these treatment differences have not been explored. Methods: We studied 930359 Americans aged 66-99 years who were diagnosed with 10 common cancers. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare claims from 1991 to 2011 were used to determine HIV status and receipt of cancer treatment in 6 months following diagnosis. Mediation analysis was conducted to estimate the direct effect of HIV, and indirect effect through cancer stage at diagnosis and comorbidities, on cancer treatment. Results:HIV-infected individuals (n = 687) were less likely to receive cancer treatment (70% vs 75% HIV uninfected; P < .01). This difference was larger in individuals aged 66-70 years, among whom only 65% were treated (vs 81% in HIV uninfected; P < .01), and time from cancer diagnosis to treatment was longer (median, 42.5 vs 36 days in HIV uninfected; P < .01). Accounting for potential confounders, HIV-infected individuals aged 66-70 years remained 20% less likely to receive cancer treatment (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% confidence interval, .71-.92]). Seventy-five percent of this total effect was due to HIV itself, with a nonsignificant 24% mediated by cancer stage and comorbidities. Conclusions: Lowest cancer treatment rates were seen in the younger subset of HIV-infected individuals, who would likely benefit most from treatment in terms of life expectancy.
Authors: Gita Suneja; Meredith S Shiels; Rory Angulo; Glenn E Copeland; Lou Gonsalves; Anne M Hakenewerth; Kathryn E Macomber; Sharon K Melville; Eric A Engels Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Winnie Ricker; William Wheeler; Ruth Parsons; Joan L Warren Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Julia L Marcus; Chun Chao; Wendy A Leyden; Lanfang Xu; Jeanette Yu; Michael A Horberg; Daniel Klein; William J Towner; Charles P Quesenberry; Donald I Abrams; Michael J Silverberg Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Christina A Clarke; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Sharon H Giordano Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Cristina E Brickman; Kathleen J Propert; Jessica S Merlin; Jeffrey C Liu; Sequoya Eady; Amy Mcghee-Jez; Camille Ragin; Surbhi Grover; Roger B Cohen; Robert Gross Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Missak Haigentz; Page Moore; Milan Bimali; Timothy Cooley; Joseph Sparano; Michelle Rudek; Lee Ratner; David Henry; Juan Ramos; John Deeken; Paul Rubinstein; Elizabeth Chiao Journal: Oncologist Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Sarah Nietz; Daniel S O'Neil; Oluwatosin Ayeni; Wenlong Carl Chen; Maureen Joffe; Judith S Jacobson; Alfred I Neugut; Paul Ruff; Witness Mapanga; Ines Buccimazza; Urishka Singh; Sharon Čačala; Laura Stopforth; Boitumelo Phakathi; Tobias Chirwa; Herbert Cubasch Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 4.872