Literature DB >> 2971778

A warning about median reaction time.

J Miller1.   

Abstract

When used with positively skewed reaction time distributions, sample medians tend to over-estimate population medians. The extent of overestimation is related directly to the amount of skew in the reaction time distributions and inversely to the size of the sample over which the median is computed. Simulations indicate that overestimation could approach 50 ms with small samples and highly skewed distributions. An important practical consequence of the bias in median reaction time is that sample medians must not be used to compare reaction times across experimental conditions when there are unequal numbers of trials in the conditions. If medians are used with unequal sample sizes, then the bias may produce an artifactual difference in conditions or conceal a true difference. Some recent studies of cuing and stimulus probability effects provide examples of this potential artifact.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2971778     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  31 in total

1.  Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects.

Authors:  C Haimson; M Behrmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  The effects of study-task relevance on perceptual repetition priming.

Authors:  Jon B Holbrook; Preston R Bost; Carolyn Backer Cave
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

3.  Developmental Shifts in Detection and Attention for Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Speech.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Cassandra Karl; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The effect of attentional cueing on conscious awareness of stimulus and response.

Authors:  Helen Johnson; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The adaptive character of the attentional system: statistical sensitivity in a target localization task.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Keith Weber; Jen Shang; Polina M Vanyukov
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Event-related brain potentials and the efficiency of visual search for vertically and horizontally oriented stimuli.

Authors:  Bruno Kopp; Jasmin Kizilirmak; Carolin Liebscher; Julia Runge; Karl Wessel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Influence of attended repetition trials on negative priming in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Patricia M Simone; Karen Ahrens; Karin Elaine Goodson Foerde; Michael Spinetta
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

10.  The problem of reversals in assessing implicit sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks.

Authors:  Joaquín M M Vaquero; Luis Jiménez; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.