Literature DB >> 29717760

Relation of Disease with Standardized Phase Angle among Older Patients.

C E Graf1, F R Herrmann, L Genton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A low phase angle (PA) has been associated with negative outcome in specific diseases. However, many patients suffer from several co-morbidities. This study aims at identifying the impact of the type and the severity of diseases on PA in a retrospective cohort study of older people.
METHODS: We included all people ≥65 years who underwent a PA measurement (Nutriguard®) between 1990 and 2011 at the Geneva University Hospitals. PA was standardized for gender, age and body mass index according to German reference values. Co-morbidities were reported in form of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale which considers 14 different organs/systems (disease categories), each rated from 0 (healthy) to 4 (severe illness) (severity grades). The association between the diseases categories and standardized PA was evaluated by a multivariate linear regression. For each significant disease category, we performed univariate regression models. The adjusted R2 was used to identify the best predictors of standardized PA. We considered that the severity grade affected standardized PA if there was a progressive decrease in the regression coefficients.
RESULTS: We included 1181 people (37% women). The multivariate regression model showed that the disease categories explain 17% of the variance of standardized PA. Many disease categories affect standardized PA and the ones best associated with standardized PA were the hematopoietic and vascular (R2 7.4%), the musculo-skeletal (R2 5.5%) and the respiratory (R2 4.0%) diseases. The regression coefficients in the univariate linear regression model decreased progressively with higher severity grades in respiratory (-0.15, -0.27, -0.55, -0.67) and musculo-skeletal diseases (-0.09, -0.46, -0.85, -0.86).
CONCLUSIONS: Many different diseases affect standardized PA. The higher the severity grade in musculo-skeletal and respiratory diseases, the lower is the standardized PA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioelectrical impendance analysiszzm321990; cumulative illness rating scale; older people; phase angle; severity of disease

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29717760     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-018-1034-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  33 in total

1.  Differences in resting metabolic rate between paraplegic and able-bodied subjects are explained by differences in body composition.

Authors:  Andrea C Buchholz; Colleen F McGillivray; Paul B Pencharz
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index.

Authors:  Anja Bosy-Westphal; Sandra Danielzik; Ralf-Peter Dörhöfer; Wiebke Later; Sonja Wiese; Manfred J Müller
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Body composition and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Annemie M W J Schols; Roelinka Broekhuizen; Clarie A Weling-Scheepers; Emiel F Wouters
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Bioelectric impedance phase angle and body composition.

Authors:  R N Baumgartner; W C Chumlea; A F Roche
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Phase angle, frailty and mortality in older adults.

Authors:  Emilee R Wilhelm-Leen; Yoshio N Hall; Ralph I Horwitz; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Chronic cellular dehydration in the aged patient.

Authors:  P Ritz
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 7.  Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis--clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters.

Authors:  Kristina Norman; Nicole Stobäus; Matthias Pirlich; Anja Bosy-Westphal
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  Evaluation of between-methods agreement of extracellular water measurements in adults and children.

Authors:  Analiza M Silva; Steven B Heymsfield; Dympna Gallagher; Jeanine Albu; Xavier F Pi-Sunyer; Richard N Pierson; Jack Wang; Stanley Heshka; Luis B Sardinha; Zimian Wang
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Fat-free mass at admission predicts 28-day mortality in intensive care unit patients: the international prospective observational study Phase Angle Project.

Authors:  Ronan Thibault; Anne-Marie Makhlouf; Aurélien Mulliez; M Cristina Gonzalez; Gintautas Kekstas; Nada Rotovnik Kozjek; Jean-Charles Preiser; Isabel Ceniceros Rozalen; Sylvain Dadet; Zeljko Krznaric; Kinga Kupczyk; Fabienne Tamion; Noël Cano; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle relates to function, disease severity and prognosis in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Matthew Maddocks; Samantha S C Kon; Sarah E Jones; Jane L Canavan; Claire M Nolan; Irene J Higginson; Wei Gao; Michael I Polkey; William D-C Man
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 7.324

View more
  4 in total

1.  Phase angle, muscle mass, and functionality in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Taís Galdêncio do Nascimento; Rebecca Peixoto Paes-Silva; Marcella Campos Lima da Luz; Poliana Coelho Cabral; Gleyce Kelly de Araújo Bezerra; Andressa Caroline Burgos Gomes
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Malnutrition-Inflammation Score VS Phase Angle in the Era of GLIM Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study among Hemodialysis Patients in UAE.

Authors:  Mirey Karavetian; Nada Salhab; Rana Rizk; Kalliopi Anna Poulia
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Relationship between nutritional status and phase angle as a noninvasive method to predict malnutrition by sex in older inpatients.

Authors:  Yuta Kubo; Kento Noritake; Daiki Nakashima; Keisuke Fujii; Kazumasa Yamada
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.131

4.  Differences According to Age in the Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac Biomarkers to Predict Frailty in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.

Authors:  Lara Aguilar-Iglesias; Ana Merino-Merino; Ester Sanchez-Corral; Maria-Jesus Garcia-Sanchez; Isabel Santos-Sanchez; Ruth Saez-Maleta; Jose-Angel Perez-Rivera
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-02-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.