Gregor J Petersilka1,2, Nicole B Arweiler2, Joachim Otto3, Tobias Wittig4. 1. Private Practice, Wuerzburg, Germany. 2. Department of Periodontology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. 3. Medical-Scientific Department, Chemische Fabrik Kreussler & Co. GmbH, Rheingaustrasse 87-93, 65203, Wiesbaden, Germany. 4. Medical-Scientific Department, Chemische Fabrik Kreussler & Co. GmbH, Rheingaustrasse 87-93, 65203, Wiesbaden, Germany. tobias.wittig@kreussler.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a topical lidocaine gel 2% (LG) during scaling and root planing (SRP) and professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anesthetic effects as well as unwanted effects of LG prior to or during SRP and PMPR were evaluated in an observational, non-randomized, non-interventional study design. A total of 385 treatments were recorded in 68 study centers all over Germany. Rating of the anesthetic effect of LG by treating personnel and patients using a four-item verbal rating scale (VRS), tolerability, safety (adverse effects), and need for additional local injection anesthesia (ALI). RESULTS: In SRP as well as in PMPR, application of LG allowed a sufficiently pain-free therapy in more than 90% of the patients as stated on the VRS (SRP: 97.8%, PMPR: 93.75%). Overall, ALI was needed in only 4.23% of the patients treated (SRP: 5.3%, PMPR: 2.62%). One adverse effect occurred within the observation. CONCLUSIONS: Application of LG may offer a safe and effective way to achieve pain-free therapy in periodontal patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patient compliance is key to the success of periodontal maintenance therapy. Effective and safe pain control during various kinds of periodontal therapy might increase patient compliance and therefore contribute to the long-term treatment success, among other factors. With regard to the patients observed in this study, 47% had previously received periodontal maintenance therapy and were therefore familiar with the treatment and the associated pain.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a topical lidocaine gel 2% (LG) during scaling and root planing (SRP) and professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anesthetic effects as well as unwanted effects of LG prior to or during SRP and PMPR were evaluated in an observational, non-randomized, non-interventional study design. A total of 385 treatments were recorded in 68 study centers all over Germany. Rating of the anesthetic effect of LG by treating personnel and patients using a four-item verbal rating scale (VRS), tolerability, safety (adverse effects), and need for additional local injection anesthesia (ALI). RESULTS: In SRP as well as in PMPR, application of LG allowed a sufficiently pain-free therapy in more than 90% of the patients as stated on the VRS (SRP: 97.8%, PMPR: 93.75%). Overall, ALI was needed in only 4.23% of the patients treated (SRP: 5.3%, PMPR: 2.62%). One adverse effect occurred within the observation. CONCLUSIONS: Application of LG may offer a safe and effective way to achieve pain-free therapy in periodontal patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patient compliance is key to the success of periodontal maintenance therapy. Effective and safe pain control during various kinds of periodontal therapy might increase patient compliance and therefore contribute to the long-term treatment success, among other factors. With regard to the patients observed in this study, 47% had previously received periodontal maintenance therapy and were therefore familiar with the treatment and the associated pain.
Entities:
Keywords:
Pain; Periodontitis; Professional mechanical plaque removal; Scaling and root planing; Topical anesthetic