Literature DB >> 29716387

Outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients.

Jesús Moreta1, Iker Uriarte1, Amaia Ormaza1, Javier Mosquera1, Kattalin Iza1, Urko Aguirre2, María José Legarreta2, José Luis Martínez-De Los Mozos1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: : The objective was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients older than 65 years treated at our institution from 2000 to 2014. We compared the most common methods of fixation: a modular tapered rectangular titanium stem versus a monoblock tapered stem.
METHODS: : A retrospective review was performed with a minimum follow-up time of 2 years. Patient mobility in the period prior to the fracture and after fracture healing and functional results was assessed according to the Harris Hip Score.
RESULTS: : A total of 43 Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures fulfilled the inclusion criteria (31 type B2 and 13 type B3). The mean age was 78 years old (66-88 years). The mean follow-up time was 5 years (range 2-12 years). A Wagner stem was used in 19 patients and a modular rectangular stem was implanted in 24 patients. Although fracture union was achieved in 93% of the cases, the mean Harris Hip Score was 73 (34-87) and 41.9% of the patients did not return to their previous ambulatory levels ( p = 0.0049). Dislocation was the most common complication (16.3%). We have found association ( p = 0.07) between subsidence with a mean of 4.14 mm and dislocation. No difference was observed between B2 and B3 fractures or between modular and monoblock stems. DISCUSSION:: Although we reported good results of fracture healing, there were functional impairment and a high rate of complications, especially dislocation, in Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Modular femoral stem; Vancouver B2-B3; monoblock stem; periprosthetic fracture; revision hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29716387     DOI: 10.1177/1120700018772163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  4 in total

1.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): a comparison between osteosynthesis and revision in a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gianluca Scalici; Debora Boncinelli; Luigi Zanna; Roberto Buzzi; Laura Antonucci; Fabrizio Di Maida; Pietro De Biase
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  Treatment algorithm in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: osteosynthesis vs revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  David González-Martín; José Luis Pais-Brito; Sergio González-Casamayor; Ayron Guerra-Ferraz; Jorge Ojeda-Jiménez; Mario Herrera-Pérez
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-08-04

3.  Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Reducing Perioperative Blood Loss During Revision Surgery for Vancouver Type B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Qiu-Ru Wang; Releken Yeersheng; Dong-Hai Li; Zhou-Yuan Yang; Peng-de Kang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.