| Literature DB >> 29716176 |
Ji Hyun Kim1, Ryun Lee1, Chi Ho Shin1, Han Kyu Kim2, Yea Sik Han1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrophy of muscle and fat often contributes to temporal hollowing after pterional craniotomy. However, the main cause is from the bony defect. Several methods to prevent temporal hollowing have been introduced, all with specific limitations. Autologous bone grafts are most ideal for cranial defect reconstruction. The authors investigated the effectiveness of bony defect coverage and temporal augmentation using pterional craniotomy bone flap.Entities:
Keywords: Bone transplantation; Craniotomy; Temporal bone; Temporal muscle
Year: 2018 PMID: 29716176 PMCID: PMC6057125 DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2018.01781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Craniofac Surg ISSN: 2287-1152
Fig. 1.Measurement of temporal thickness via computed tomography coronal image. Temporal thickness is defined as the shortest distance between the skin surface and a line drawn from the lateral orbital rim tangentially to the temporal bone. The blue line is a horizontal line drawn from the deepest point of the temporal fossa. The yellow line is a line from lateral orbital rim to the tangential point on the temporal bone. The green line originates from the intersection between the skin surface and the blue line, and runs parallel to the yellow line. The red line (temporal thickness) was a shortest distance from the yellow line and the green line. (A) A 74-year-old female in group 1 underwent pterional craniotomy with temporal augmentation on the right side. Temporal thickness was 12.08 mm on operated side and 12.49 mm on non-operated side 12-month after surgery. (B) A 63-year-old female in group 2 underwent pterional craniotomy on the right side without temporal augmentation. Temporal thickness was 3.40 mm on operated side and 13.19 mm on non-operated side 12-months after surgery.
Grade of temporal hollowing
| Grade | Degree of temporal hollowing (%)[ |
|---|---|
| 0 | No hollowing (<10) |
| 1 | Mild hollowing (10–25) |
| 2 | Moderate hollowing (25–50) |
| 3 | Severe hollowing (>50) |
Difference in the temporal thickness between the operated and non-operated sides.
Fig. 2.Surgical technique of temporal augmentation with calvarial onlay graft. A 48-year-old male with glioma on right temporal lobe underwent pterional craniotomy with temporal augmentation with calvarial onlay graft. (A)The cranial bone flap was separated. (B) Parietal segment of the cranial bone flap was marked and divided. The parietal segment was then split at the diploic space. The outer table was fixed it its original position. (C) The inner table was further divided and used as the flap for defect coverage (yellow arrow) and the onlay graft for temporal augmentation (blue arrow). (D) The reconstructed cranial bone flap was placed back on the patient. a, anterior; c, cephalic; p, posterior; c’, caudal.
Patient characteristics
| Variable | Group 1 (n=41) | Group 2 (n=59) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 45.9±13.64 | 49±13.2 | 0.671 |
| Sex | 0.798 | ||
| Male | 16 (39) | 22 (37) | |
| Female | 25 (61) | 37 (63) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.3±3.55 | 23.9±3.53 | 0.886 |
| Comorbidity | |||
| HTN | 5 (12) | 8 (14) | 0.548 |
| DM | 5 (12) | 9 (15) | 0.428 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). Group 1 underwent pterional craniotomy with temporal augmentation and group 2 without temporal augmentation.
BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus.
Intraoperative findings of group 1 (with temporal augmentation)
| Variable | Group 1 |
|---|---|
| Size (cm2) | |
| Craniotomy bone segment | 102.7±23.4 |
| Bone flap for defect coverage | 10.28±7.15 |
| Onlay graft (cm2) | 7.49±1.58 |
| Mean thickness (mm) | |
| Onlay graft | 2.33±0.47 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Group 1 underwent pterional craniotomy with temporal augmentation.
Results of the operation
| Variable | Group 1 (n=41) | Group 2 (n=59) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temporal thickness | |||
| Operated side (A, mm) | 13.75±3.05 | 5.80±3.48 | <0.001[ |
| Non-operated side (B, mm) | 13.82±2.99 | 13.04±1.97 | 0.195 |
| Ratio (A to B) | 0.99±0.29 | 0.44±0.25 | <0.001[ |
| VAS score | 1.77±1.26 | 6.85±2.24 | <0.001[ |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Group 1 underwent pterional craniotomy with temporal augmentation and group 2 without temporal augmentation.
VAS, visual analogue scale.
p-value <0.001.
Fig. 3.Preoperative and postoperative gross photographs. (A) Preoperative photograph of a 52-year-old female with meningioma on left frontal convexity who underwent pterional craniotomy with temporal augmentation. There was no temporal hollowing before surgery. (B) Postoperative photograph at 12 months of the patient without temporal hollowing. She was very satisfied with the results of the temporal augmentation. (C) Preoperative photograph of a 31-year-old female with meningioma who underwent pterional craniotomy without temporal augmentation. There was no temporal hollowing before surgery. (D) Temporal hollowing was seen at postoperative 12 months.
Grade of temporal hollowing in group 1 and group 2
| Grade | Group 1 (n=41) | Group 2 (n=59) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 38 (93) | 3 (5) |
| 1 | 2 (5) | 5 (8) |
| 2 | 1 (2) | 7 (12) |
| 3 | 0 | 44 (75) |
Values are presented as number (%). Group 1 underwent pterional craniotomy with temporal augmentation and group 2 without temporal augmentation.
Complications
| Complication | Group 1 (n=41) | Group 2 (n=59) |
|---|---|---|
| Marginal skin necrosis | 1 (2) | 5 (8) |
| Temporal bulging | 2 (5) | 0 |
Values are presented as number (%). Group 1 underwent pterional craniotomy with temporal augmentation and group 2 without temporal augmentation.