| Literature DB >> 29715289 |
N González-Muñoz1, F Sterck2, J M Torres-Ruiz1, G Petit3, H Cochard4, G von Arx5,6, A Lintunen7, M C Caldeira8, G Capdeville1, P Copini2,9, R Gebauer10, L Grönlund7, T Hölttä7, R Lobo-do-Vale8, M Peltoniemi11, A Stritih12, J Urban10, S Delzon1.
Abstract
Many studies have reported that hydraulic properties vary considerably between tree species, but little is known about their intraspecific variation and, therefore, their capacity to adapt to a warmer and drier climate. Here, we quantify phenotypic divergence and clinal variation for embolism resistance, hydraulic conductivity and branch growth, in four tree species, two angiosperms (Betula pendula, Populus tremula) and two conifers (Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris), across their latitudinal distribution in Europe. Growth and hydraulic efficiency varied widely within species and between populations. The variability of embolism resistance was in general weaker than that of growth and hydraulic efficiency, and very low for all species but Populus tremula. In addition, no and weak support for a safety vs. efficiency trade-off was observed for the angiosperm and conifer species, respectively. The limited variability of embolism resistance observed here for all species except Populus tremula, suggests that forest populations will unlikely be able to adapt hydraulically to drier conditions through the evolution of embolism resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29715289 PMCID: PMC5929519 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Xylem vulnerability curves for each population of the four species studied (Betula pendula, Populus tremula, Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris).
The shaded band represents the standard deviation. CR: Czech Republic; Fi-RU: Finland-Ruotsinkylä; NE: The Netherlands; PO: Portugal; Fi-HYY: Finland-Hyytiälä; Fi-VA: Finland-Värriö; IT: Italy; SW-LOE: Switzerland-Loetschental; SW-PFY: Switzerland- Pfynwald.
Effects of population and site on P (MPa), xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (K, kg m-1 MPa-1 s-1) and branch growth (BG, estimated as branch radius/xylem age (mm/year)) of study species, according to nested ANOVAs.
The F, p-values and degrees of freedom are shown. Pop: population.
| Angiosperms | Conifers | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betula pendula | Populus tremula | Picea abies | Pinus syvestris | |||||||||||
| df | F | p | df | F | p | df | F | p | df | F | p | |||
| Population | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||
| P50 | Site (Pop) | 4 | 4 | 6 | 1.042 | 0.405 | 6 | |||||||
| Population | 3 | 2 | 0.249 | 0.781 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| Ks | Site (Pop) | 4 | 1.022 | 0.405 | 3 | 2.809 | 0.051 | 6 | 1.743 | 0.123 | 6 | 2.019 | 0.070 | |
| Population | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||
| BG | Site (Pop) | 4 | 2.140 | 0.107 | 4 | 1.021 | 0.416 | 6 | 6 | |||||
Fig 2Mean P (MPa), xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (K, kg m-1 MPa-1 s-1) and branch growth (mm/year) per species, population and site.
The two sites are represented in different colours (white and grey). The bars represent the nominal range of data variation, with the upper and lower ends showing the upper quartile plus 1.5 times the interquartile range and the lower quartile minus 1.5 times the interquartile range, respectively. Values beyond these limits are plotted as circles. CR: Czech Republic; PO: Portugal; NE: The Netherlands; Fi-RU: Finland-Ruotsinkylä; Fi-VA: Finland-Värriö; Fi-HYY: Finland-Hyytiälä; IT: Italy; SW-LOW: Switzerland-Loetschental; SW-PFY: Switzerland- Pfywald. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between populations.
Intraspecific (CVsp) and inter-population (CVinter) coefficient of variability (%) for the xylem pressure inducing a 50% loss of conductance (P50, MPa), xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (K, kg m-1 MPa-1 s-1) and branch growth (BG, estimated as branch radius/xylem age (mm/year)) for each study species.
| CVsp | CVinter | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | BG | BG | ||||
| 9.67 | 53.47 | 58.94 | 5.56 | 50.28 | 47.05 | |
| 25.07 | 80.04 | 43.29 | 24.82 | 14.16 | 37.66 | |
| 6.57 | 49.07 | 57.49 | 4.15 | 42.68 | 53.48 | |
| 10.23 | 48.41 | 85.81 | 6.45 | 23.80 | 76.67 |
Correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman) and p-values for the relationships between the mean xylem pressure inducing a 50% loss of conductance (P50, MPa), xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (Ks, kg m-1 MPa-1 s-1) and branch growth (BG, estimated as branch radius/xylem age (mm/year)) and the climatic variables for each sampling site.
| Cor. | p | Cor. | p | Cor. | p | Cor. | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P50 | Latitude | 0.167 | 0.692 | -0.568 | 0.054 | 0.193 | 0.547 | ||
| MAT | -0.547 | 0.161 | 0.420 | 0.174 | 0.056 | 0.862 | |||
| MAP | 0.539 | 0.168 | -0.214 | 0.610 | 0.288 | 0.364 | -0.466 | 0.127 | |
| AI | 0.460 | 0.251 | -0.112 | 0.728 | -0.462 | 0.130 | |||
| T_Sum | 0.341 | 0.278 | -0.120 | 0.711 | |||||
| AI_Sum | -0.289 | 0.487 | 0.098 | 0.761 | -0.578 | 0.049 | |||
| Ks | Latitude | 0.228 | 0.586 | -0.166 | 0.753 | 0.001 | 1.000 | -0.122 | 0.704 |
| MAT | 0.308 | 0.553 | -0.147 | 0.649 | 0.408 | 0.187 | |||
| MAP | -0.119 | 0.779 | 0.086 | 0.872 | -0.414 | 0.181 | 0.276 | 0.384 | |
| AI | 0.231 | 0.582 | -0.206 | 0.695 | -0.239 | 0.455 | -0.279 | 0.379 | |
| T_Sum | -0.428 | 0.290 | 0.292 | 0.575 | 0.082 | 0.799 | 0.225 | 0.481 | |
| AI_Sum | -0.180 | 0.670 | -0.439 | 0.383 | -0.028 | 0.931 | 0.019 | 0.952 | |
| BG | Latitude | 0.497 | 0.210 | -0.386 | 0.215 | -0.224 | 0.484 | ||
| MAT | -0.423 | 0.296 | |||||||
| MAP | 0.452 | 0.260 | 0.133 | 0.679 | 0.027 | 0.934 | |||
| AI | -0.669 | 0.069 | |||||||
| T_Sum | 0.364 | 0.375 | 0.394 | 0.205 | |||||
| AI_Sum | 0.527 | 0.179 | -0.394 | 0.205 | -0.387 | 0.214 | |||
Statistically significant correlations are highlighted in bold. MAT: mean annual temperature (°C); MAP: total annual precipitation (mm); AI: aridity index (MAP/PET or potential evapotranspiration). T_Sum (°C) and AI_Sum: averaged mean temperature and aridity indices, respectively, for June, July and August.
Fig 3Mean P (MPa) per population plotted against latitude (3.a, decimal degrees) and the climatic variables for each sampled population and site: 3.b. mean annual temperature (MAT, °C); 3.c. total annual precipitation; (MAP, mm); 3.d. AI: aridity index (MAP/PET or potential evapotranspiration).
Fig 4Average xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (Ks, kg m-1 MPa-1 s-1) per population plotted against latitude (3.a, decimal degrees) and the climatic variables of each sampled population and site: 3.b. mean annual temperature (MAT, °C); 3.c. total annual precipitation; (MAP, mm); 3.d. AI: aridity index (MAP/PET or potential evapotranspiration).
Fig 5Mean branch growth (estimated as branch radius/xylem age (mm/year)) per population plotted against latitude (5.a, decimal degrees) and the climatic variables of each sampled population and site: 5.b. mean annual temperature (MAT, °C); 5.c. total annual precipitation; (MAP, mm); 5.d. AI: aridity index (MAP/PET or potential evapotranspiration).
Correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman) for the relationship between P50 (MPa) and xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (Ks, kg m-1 MPa-1 s-1) for each tree.
Statistical significances are shown.
| Cor. | Cor. | Cor. | Cor. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.150 | 0.274 | -0.001 | 0.995 | |||||
Statistically significant correlations are shown in bold characters.