Literature DB >> 29714560

Patient Experience Data in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulatory Decision Making:: A Policy Process Perspective.

Carrie M Kuehn1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of patient advocates on FDA regulatory decision making has increased. Despite enhanced engagement with FDA, there remain challenges to achieving the regulatory goals of patients within FDA's regulatory framework. Gaps exist between patient advocates' knowledge of the agency's processes and FDA's need for rigorous, clinically meaningful patient experience data. This study examined the policy process in which patient experience data are collected by patient advocates and provided to FDA for regulatory decision making.
METHODS: Semistructured, narrative interviews were conducted with 14 professionals working in patient advocacy or at FDA. The purpose was to examine, in depth, participants' perceptions and experiences regarding this new regulatory process. Interviews were coded and examined for themes.
RESULTS: The use of patient experience data by FDA is an evolving regulatory process. Participants identified a number of barriers and contributors to regulatory success. Well-organized and sophisticated patient advocacy groups with access to scientific and policy expertise are more likely to find success meeting FDA's patient experience data requirements. A conceptual model of this regulatory process was developed.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of patient experience data by FDA has the potential to positively influence the regulation of medical products in the United States. Success within this new regulatory process will depend on clear guidance from FDA regarding the collection, analysis, and use of patient experience data. Patient advocacy groups must enhance internal capacity and expertise while engaging in substantive collaborations with FDA and other stakeholders in order to meaningfully contribute to the regulatory review of new therapeutics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDA; engagement; patient advocacy; patient experience; regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29714560     DOI: 10.1177/2168479017753390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  3 in total

1.  Real World Survey of Patient Engagement Status in Clinical Research: The First Input from Japan.

Authors:  Nanae Tanemura; Tsuyoshi Sasaki; Junko Sato; Hisashi Urushihara
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for medicines: Considerations for external control arms.

Authors:  Mehmet Burcu; Nancy A Dreyer; Jessica M Franklin; Michael D Blum; Cathy W Critchlow; Eleanor M Perfetto; Wei Zhou
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Outpatients' Opinion And Experience Regarding Telepharmacy During The COVID-19 Pandemic: The Enopex Project.

Authors:  Luis Margusino-Framiñán; Cecilia M Fernández-Llamazares; Eva Negro-Vega; Begoña Tortajada-Goitia; Garbiñe Lizeaga; Gabriel Mercadal-Orfila; Carmen Almeida-González; Ramón Morillo-Verdugo
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.