Literature DB >> 29713053

First-line renin-angiotensin system inhibitors vs. other first-line antihypertensive drug classes in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Ganmi Wang1, Yujie Chen1, Liangjin Li1, Wenlu Tang2, James M Wright3.   

Abstract

First-line renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are recommended for diabetic patients because of their potential nephron-protective properties. For hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, little is known about first-line RAS inhibitors vs. other first-line antihypertensive agents in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the comparative efficacy of first-line RAS inhibitors vs. other first-line antihypertensive drug classes in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We identified RCTs by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to December 15, 2015. Eighteen RCTs involving 18,862 participants were included. First-line RAS inhibitors were not different from first-line diuretics for all the primary outcomes. First-line RAS inhibitors reduced major cardiovascular events (2 RCTs, relative risk [RR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66, 0.91) and heart failure (4 RCTs, RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61, 0.83) compared to first-line calcium channel blockers. Compared to β-blockers, RAS inhibitors reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (1 RCT, RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47, 0.84), major cardiovascular events (1 RCT, RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62, 0.93) and heart failure (1 RCT, RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40, 0.92). Our meta-analysis indicates that, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, first-line RAS inhibitors reduced adverse cardiovascular events to the same degree as first-line diuretics but to a greater degree than first-line calcium channel blockers and first-line beta blockers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29713053     DOI: 10.1038/s41371-018-0066-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  77 in total

1.  2013 ESH/ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stephane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 4.  Effects of blood pressure-lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 5. Head-to-head comparisons of various classes of antihypertensive drugs - overview and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Costas Thomopoulos; Gianfranco Parati; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension: the prospective randomized enalapril study evaluating regression of ventricular enlargement (preserve) trial.

Authors:  R B Devereux; V Palmieri; N Sharpe; V De Quattro; J N Bella; G de Simone; J F Walker; R T Hahn; B Dahlöf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.

Authors:  Lars H Lindholm; Hans Ibsen; Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel; Peter Aurup; Jonathan Edelman; Steven Snapinn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-23       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Irbesartan has no short-term effect on insulin resistance in hypertensive patients with additional cardiometabolic risk factors (i-RESPOND).

Authors:  K G Parhofer; K I Birkeland; R DeFronzo; S Del Prato; A Bhaumik; A Ptaszynska
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Effect of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system and other antihypertensive drugs on renal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan P Casas; Weiliang Chua; Stavros Loukogeorgakis; Patrick Vallance; Liam Smeeth; Aroon D Hingorani; Raymond J MacAllister
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Changes in aortic pulse wave velocity in hypertensive postmenopausal women: comparison between a calcium channel blocker vs angiotensin receptor blocker regimen.

Authors:  Daniel Hayoz; Dion H Zappe; Marie A R Meyer; Inyoung Baek; Albert Kandra; Marie P Joly; Lucia Mazzolai; Erik Haesler; Daniel Periard
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Does atenolol differ from other beta-adrenergic blockers?

Authors:  Ivar Aursnes; Jan-Bjørn Osnes; Ingunn Fride Tvete; Jørund Gåsemyr; Bent Natvig
Journal:  BMC Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Hypertension control in Kerala, India: A prescription-based study at primary and secondary level health care institutions.

Authors:  Thekkumkara Prabhakaran Sreelal; Jissa Vinoda Thulaseedharan; Sanjeev Nair; Rekha Melathuparambil Ravindran; Krishnapillai Vijayakumar; Ravi Prasad Varma
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 2.  Hypothesized mechanisms explaining poor prognosis in type 2 diabetes patients with COVID-19: a review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lisco; Anna De Tullio; Vito Angelo Giagulli; Edoardo Guastamacchia; Giovanni De Pergola; Vincenzo Triggiani
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.633

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.