Literature DB >> 29712828

Earth's magnetic field is probably not reversing.

Maxwell Brown1,2, Monika Korte2, Richard Holme3,4, Ingo Wardinski2,5, Sydney Gunnarson6.   

Abstract

The geomagnetic field has been decaying at a rate of ∼5% per century from at least 1840, with indirect observations suggesting a decay since 1600 or even earlier. This has led to the assertion that the geomagnetic field may be undergoing a reversal or an excursion. We have derived a model of the geomagnetic field spanning 30-50 ka, constructed to study the behavior of the two most recent excursions: the Laschamp and Mono Lake, centered at 41 and 34 ka, respectively. Here, we show that neither excursion demonstrates field evolution similar to current changes in the geomagnetic field. At earlier times, centered at 49 and 46 ka, the field is comparable to today's field, with an intensity structure similar to today's South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA); however, neither of these SAA-like fields develop into an excursion or reversal. This suggests that the current weakened field will also recover without an extreme event such as an excursion or reversal. The SAA-like field structure at 46 ka appears to be coeval with published increases in geomagnetically modulated beryllium and chlorine nuclide production, despite the global dipole field not weakening significantly in our model during this time. This agreement suggests a greater complexity in the relationship between cosmogenic nuclide production and the geomagnetic field than is commonly assumed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laschamp excursion; South Atlantic anomaly; geomagnetism; paleomagnetism; reversals

Year:  2018        PMID: 29712828      PMCID: PMC5960311          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1722110115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Oersted and Magsat satellite data.

Authors:  Gauthier Hulot; Céline Eymin; Benoît Langlais; Mioara Mandea; Nils Olsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Fall in Earth's magnetic field is erratic.

Authors:  David Gubbins; Adrian L Jones; Christopher C Finlay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Changes in earth's dipole.

Authors:  Peter Olson; Hagay Amit
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-08-17

4.  Structure and dynamics of Earth's lower mantle.

Authors:  Edward J Garnero; Allen K McNamara
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Antiquity of the South Atlantic Anomaly and evidence for top-down control on the geodynamo.

Authors:  John A Tarduno; Michael K Watkeys; Thomas N Huffman; Rory D Cottrell; Eric G Blackman; Anna Wendt; Cecilia A Scribner; Courtney L Wagner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Subterranean clues to the future of our planetary magnetic shield.

Authors:  John A Tarduno
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multidecadally resolved polarity oscillations during a geomagnetic excursion.

Authors:  Yu-Min Chou; Xiuyang Jiang; Qingsong Liu; Hsun-Ming Hu; Chung-Che Wu; Jianxing Liu; Zhaoxia Jiang; Teh-Quei Lee; Chun-Chieh Wang; Yen-Fang Song; Cheng-Cheng Chiang; Liangcheng Tan; Mahjoor A Lone; Yongxin Pan; Rixiang Zhu; Yaoqi He; Yu-Chen Chou; An-Hung Tan; Andrew P Roberts; Xiang Zhao; Chuan-Chou Shen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Elevated paleomagnetic dispersion at Saint Helena suggests long-lived anomalous behavior in the South Atlantic.

Authors:  Yael A Engbers; Andrew J Biggin; Richard K Bono
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Rapid geomagnetic changes inferred from Earth observations and numerical simulations.

Authors:  Christopher J Davies; Catherine G Constable
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Quantitative estimates of average geomagnetic axial dipole dominance in deep geological time.

Authors:  Andrew J Biggin; Richard K Bono; Domenico G Meduri; Courtney J Sprain; Christopher J Davies; Richard Holme; Pavel V Doubrovine
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Recurrent ancient geomagnetic field anomalies shed light on future evolution of the South Atlantic Anomaly.

Authors:  Andreas Nilsson; Neil Suttie; Joseph S Stoner; Raimund Muscheler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 12.779

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.