Literature DB >> 29712784

Temporal Response Properties of Accessory Olfactory Bulb Neurons: Limitations and Opportunities for Decoding.

Michal Yoles-Frenkel1, Anat Kahan1, Yoram Ben-Shaul2.   

Abstract

The vomeronasal system (VNS) is a major vertebrate chemosensory system that functions in parallel to the main olfactory system (MOS). Despite many similarities, the two systems dramatically differ in the temporal domain. While MOS responses are governed by breathing and follow a subsecond temporal scale, VNS responses are uncoupled from breathing and evolve over seconds. This suggests that the contribution of response dynamics to stimulus information will differ between these systems. While temporal dynamics in the MOS are widely investigated, similar analyses in the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) are lacking. Here, we have addressed this issue using controlled stimulus delivery to the vomeronasal organ of male and female mice. We first analyzed the temporal properties of AOB projection neurons and demonstrated that neurons display prolonged, variable, and neuron-specific characteristics. We then analyzed various decoding schemes using AOB population responses. We showed that compared with the simplest scheme (i.e., integration of spike counts over the entire response period), the division of this period into smaller temporal bins actually yields poorer decoding accuracy. However, optimal classification accuracy can be achieved well before the end of the response period by integrating spike counts within temporally defined windows. Since VNS stimulus uptake is variable, we analyzed decoding using limited information about stimulus uptake time, and showed that with enough neurons, such time-invariant decoding is feasible. Finally, we conducted simulations that demonstrated that, unlike the main olfactory bulb, the temporal features of AOB neurons disfavor decoding with high temporal accuracy, and, rather, support decoding without precise knowledge of stimulus uptake time.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A key goal in sensory system research is to identify which metrics of neuronal activity are relevant for decoding stimulus features. Here, we describe the first systematic analysis of temporal coding in the vomeronasal system (VNS), a chemosensory system devoted to socially relevant cues. Compared with the main olfactory system, timescales of VNS function are inherently slower and variable. Using various analyses of real and simulated data, we show that the consideration of response times relative to stimulus uptake can aid the decoding of stimulus information from neuronal activity. However, response properties of accessory olfactory bulb neurons favor decoding schemes that do not rely on the precise timing of stimulus uptake. Such schemes are consistent with the variable nature of VNS stimulus uptake.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/384957-20$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accessory olfactory bulb; decoding; temporal coding; vomeronasal system

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29712784      PMCID: PMC6596120          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2091-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  50 in total

Review 1.  Parallel processing of social signals by the mammalian main and accessory olfactory systems.

Authors:  M Spehr; J Spehr; K Ukhanov; K R Kelliher; T Leinders-Zufall; F Zufall
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Chemosensory burst coding by mouse vomeronasal sensory neurons.

Authors:  Hannah A Arnson; Timothy E Holy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Precise olfactory responses tile the sniff cycle.

Authors:  Roman Shusterman; Matthew C Smear; Alexei A Koulakov; Dmitry Rinberg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Efferent control of stimulus access to the hamster vomeronasal organ.

Authors:  M Meredith; R J O'Connell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  [Comparative anatomic studies of the vomeronasal complex and the rostral palate of various mammals].

Authors:  A Wöhrmann-Repenning
Journal:  Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb       Date:  1984

6.  Perception of sniff phase in mouse olfaction.

Authors:  Matthew Smear; Roman Shusterman; Rodney O'Connor; Thomas Bozza; Dmitry Rinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Reliable sex and strain discrimination in the mouse vomeronasal organ and accessory olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Illya I Tolokh; Xiaoyan Fu; Timothy E Holy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  In vivo stimulus presentation to the mouse vomeronasal system: Surgery, experiment, setup, and software.

Authors:  Michal Yoles-Frenkel; Oksana Cohen; Rohini Bansal; Noa Horesh; Yoram Ben-Shaul
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Different types of theta rhythmicity are induced by social and fearful stimuli in a network associated with social memory.

Authors:  Alex Tendler; Shlomo Wagner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Interdependent Conductances Drive Infraslow Intrinsic Rhythmogenesis in a Subset of Accessory Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons.

Authors:  Monika Gorin; Chryssanthi Tsitoura; Anat Kahan; Katja Watznauer; Daniela R Drose; Martijn Arts; Rudolf Mathar; Simon O'Connor; Ileana L Hanganu-Opatz; Yoram Ben-Shaul; Marc Spehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Signal Detection and Coding in the Accessory Olfactory System.

Authors:  Julia Mohrhardt; Maximilian Nagel; David Fleck; Yoram Ben-Shaul; Marc Spehr
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Synchronous Infra-Slow Oscillations Organize Ensembles of Accessory Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons into Distinct Microcircuits.

Authors:  Chryssanthi Tsitoura; Sebastian T Malinowski; Julia Mohrhardt; Rudolf Degen; Brett T DiBenedictis; Yuan Gao; Katja Watznauer; Kira Gerhold; Maximilian Nagel; Monika Weber; Markus Rothermel; Ileana L Hanganu-Opatz; Yoram Ben-Shaul; Ian G Davison; Marc Spehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Do all mice smell the same? Chemosensory cues from inbred and wild mouse strains elicit stereotypic sensory representations in the accessory olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Rohini Bansal; Maximilian Nagel; Romana Stopkova; Yizhak Sofer; Tali Kimchi; Pavel Stopka; Marc Spehr; Yoram Ben-Shaul
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 7.431

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.