Literature DB >> 29712042

Sensing A Paradigm Shift in the Field of Molecular Recognition: From Selective to Differential Receptors.

John J Lavigne1, Eric V Anslyn1.   

Abstract

Molecular recognition has evolved from a science designed to understand biological systems into a much more diverse area of research. While work continues to elucidate "nature's tricks" with respect to intermolecular interactions, much attention has turned to the perspective that molecular recognition, by design, can lead to new technologies. Applications ranging from molecular sensing to information storage and even working molecular machines have been envisioned. This review will highlight a few historical hallmarks of molecular recognition oriented at studying the basic science of intermolecular interactions, but then detail recent advances in molecular recognition aimed towards applications in the field of molecular sensing. Rational design can be used to create synthetic receptors with a good deal of predictability and selectivity, and many signal transduction mechanisms exist for converting these receptors into sensors. This is the first topic discussed. The concept of "differential" or "generalized" sensing is then presented, where one uses an array of sensors that do not necessarily conform to the "lock and key" principle. This approach to sensing is inspired by the mammalian senses of taste and smell, which we briefly describe. To mimic senses of taste and smell, one is naturally led to the use of combinatorial libraries, a direction of research that has seen continued growth over the past few years. We summarize the current state of the art in synthetic combinatorial receptors/sensors, and then predict a future direction that the field of molecular recognition will possibly take. The review is not meant for the specialist, but instead for a general audience. It does not present a highly detailed analysis of each individual topic: synthetic receptors, sensors, olfaction/gustation, and combinatorial receptors/sensors. Instead, this review shows how all these fields complement each other and fit together to create sensing devices. Our conclusion is that specific analyte sensing, differential sensing, and combinatorial chemistry can and will be combined to create sensor arrays, and give the subfield of molecular recognition that uses synthetic systems a bright future in this type of sensing scenario.
© 2001 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Fed. Rep. of Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analytical methods; combinatorial chemistry; molecular recognition; receptors; sensors

Year:  2001        PMID: 29712042     DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010903)40:17<3118::AID-ANIE3118>3.0.CO;2-Y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


  12 in total

Review 1.  RNA Structural Differentiation: Opportunities with Pattern Recognition.

Authors:  Christopher S Eubanks; Amanda E Hargrove
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  A differential fluorescent receptor for nucleic acid analysis.

Authors:  Hillary N Bengtson; Dmitry M Kolpashchikov
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.164

3.  Dynamic multicomponent hemiaminal assembly.

Authors:  Lei You; S Reid Long; Vincent M Lynch; Eric V Anslyn
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 4.  Array-based "Chemical Nose" Sensing in Diagnostics and Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Yingying Geng; William J Peveler; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Force spectroscopy of the double-tethered concanavalin-A mannose bond.

Authors:  Timothy V Ratto; Kevin C Langry; Robert E Rudd; Rodney L Balhorn; Michael J Allen; Michael W McElfresh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Label-Free Detection of Tear Biomarkers Using Hydrogel-Coated Gold Nanoshells in a Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Biosensor.

Authors:  Heidi R Culver; Marissa E Wechsler; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Real-time measurement of small molecules directly in awake, ambulatory animals.

Authors:  Netzahualcóyotl Arroyo-Currás; Jacob Somerson; Philip A Vieira; Kyle L Ploense; Tod E Kippin; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Assessment of EtQxBox complexation in solution by steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Arianna Aprile; Giovanna Palermo; Antonio De Luca; Roberta Pinalli; Enrico Dalcanale; Pasquale Pagliusi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.036

9.  The factors that govern the allosteric chemical sensing of polythiophene chemosensors: scope and limitation toward signal-amplification sensing.

Authors:  Tomoaki Tsuchiya; Hiroaki Mizuno; Gaku Fukuhara
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.036

10.  Stimuli-responsive polyguanidino-oxanorbornene membrane transporters as multicomponent sensors in complex matrices.

Authors:  Andreas Hennig; Gregory J Gabriel; Gregory N Tew; Stefan Matile
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.