| Literature DB >> 29710843 |
Iffa A Fiqrianti1, Prihartini Widiyanti2,3, Muhammad A Manaf4, Claudia Y Savira5, Nadia R Cahyani6, Fitria R Bella7.
Abstract
Poly-L-Lactic acid (PLLA) blended with chitosan and collagen was used to fabricate a conduit for blood vessel engineering through an electrospinning process. Various concentrations of chitosan were used in the blend in order to study its effect on the morphology, chemical bond, tensile strength, burst pressure, hemocompatibility, and cell viability (cytotoxicity) of the tube.In vitro assessments indicated that addition of chitosan-collagen could improve cell viability and hemocompatibility. Best results were demonstrated by the conduit with 10% PLLA, 0.5% chitosan, and 1% collagen. Tensile strength reached 2.13 MPa and burst pressure reached 2593 mmHg, both values that are within the range value of native blood vessel. A hemolysis percentage of 1.04% and a cell viability of 86.2% were obtained, meeting the standards of high hemocompatibility and low cytotoxicity for vascular graft material. The results are promising for further development toward vascular graft application.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; collagen; electrospinning; poly L-lactic acid; tube; vascular graft
Year: 2018 PMID: 29710843 PMCID: PMC6023529 DOI: 10.3390/jfb9020032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Figure 1Tubes.
Figure 2FTIR Spectra of Tube.
Figure 3Cross-section (25× magnification) of (a) Sample A; (b) Sample B; (c) Sample C. Nanofiber diameters of (d) Sample A (500× magnification); (e) Sample B; (f) Sample C (5000× magnification), Pa is nanofiber diameter, Pb is the inclination of the measuring line.
The results of morphological study of the vascular grafts.
| Sample | Outer Diameter (mm) and Thickness (mm) | Fiber Diameter (nm) | Fiber-to-Fiber Distance (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A (PLLA) | 3.04 ± 0.02 | 135.8–205.9 | 3.796–31.27 |
| B (PLLA-Collagen-Chitosan 0.5%) | 2.93 ± 0.05 | 89.33–246.7 | 5.141–30.144 |
| C PLLA-Collagen-Chitosan 0.6%) | 2.87 ± 0.06 | 130.2–229.9 | 4.362–30.872 |
Tensile strength and burst pressure of Sample A, B, and C.
| Sample | Tensile Strength (N/mm2) | Burst Pressure (mmHg) |
|---|---|---|
| A (Control) | 1.62 | 3576 |
| B (PLLA-Collagen-Chitosan 0.5%) | 2.13 | 2593 |
| C (PLLA-Collagen-Chitosan 0.6%) | 3.19 | 1371 |
Figure 4(A) Stress-strain curve of sample A, B, and C; (B) Burst pressure of sample A, B, and C.
Figure 5Cell viability in each sample A, B, and C.
Absorbance and hemolysis status in sample A, B, and C.
| Sample | Average Absorbance (Hm) | Hemolysis Percentage (%) | Hemolytic Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| A (PLLA, Control) | 0.052 | 14.63 | Hemolytic |
| B (PLLA-Collagen-Chitosan 0.5%) | 0.039 | 1.04 | Non Hemolytic |
| C (PLLA-Collagen-Chitosan 0.6%) | 0.041 | 3.14 | Slightly Hemolytic |
Concentration of each polymer in the samples.
| Sample | Concentration ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PLLA | Collagen | Chitosan | |
| A (PLLA, Control) | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| B (PLLA-Collagen-Chitosan 0.5%) | 10 | 1 | 0.5 |
| C (PLLA-Collagen-Chitosan 0.6%) | 10 | 1 | 0.6 |